UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.             )

Filed by the Registrantþ

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þDefinitive Proxy Statement
¨Definitive Additional Materials
¨Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12.

ALLEGHANY CORPORATION

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

  

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

þNo fee required.

 

¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

 (1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 (2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

  

 

 (3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

  

 (4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

  

 (5)Total fee paid:

  

 

 

¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 (1)Amount Previously Paid:

 

  

 

 (2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

  

 

 (3)Filing Party:

  

 

 

 (4)Date Filed:

 

  


ALLEGHANY CORPORATIONLOGO

7 Times Square Tower

New York, New York 10036

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

April 26, 2013 at 10:00 a.m., Local Time

The Penn Club

March 17, 2016

30 West 44th Street

New York, New York

Alleghany Corporation (“Alleghany”) hereby gives notice that its 20132016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2016 Annual Meeting”) will be held at The Penn Club of New York, 30 West 44th Street, New York, New York, on Friday, April 26, 201322, 2016 at 10:00 a.m., local time, for the following purposes:

 1.To elect fourtwo directors for terms expiring in 2016.2019.

 

 2.To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2013.2016.

 

 3.To hold an advisory, non-binding vote on executive compensation.

 

 4.To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting, or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Holders of Alleghany common stock at the close of business on March 1, 20132016 are entitled to receive this Notice and vote for the election of directors and on each of the other matters set forth above at the 20132016 Annual Meeting and any adjournments of this meeting.or postponements thereof.

You are cordially invited to attend the 20132016 Annual Meeting. Representation of your shares at the meeting2016 Annual Meeting is very important. Whether or not you plan to attend in person, we encourage you to vote your shares promptly by telephone, byusing the Internet or telephone, or by signing and returning the enclosed proxy card in the envelope provided. You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the 20132016 Annual Meeting by written notice to the Secretary of Alleghany, by submitting a new proxy with a later date, or by voting in person at the 20132016 Annual Meeting.

 

By order of the Board of Directors,
CHRISTOPHER K. DALRYMPLE

Senior Vice President, General

Counsel and Secretary

Alleghany Corporation

7 Times Square Tower

New York, New York 10036

March 15, 2013

Important Notice Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for the Alleghany Corporation 20132016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on April 26, 2013:22, 2016: Proxy materials relating to our 2013the 2016 Annual Meeting (notice of meeting, proxy statement, proxy and 20122015 Annual Report to Stockholders onForm 10-K) are also available on the Internet. Please go to www.edocumentview.com/YAL to view and obtain the proxy materials online.Internet at www.envisionreports.com/YAL.


ALLEGHANY CORPORATION

7 Times Square Tower

New York, New York 10036

PROXY STATEMENT

2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held April 26, 2013

Alleghany Corporation, referred to in this proxy statement as “Alleghany,” “we,” “our,” or “us,” is providing these proxy materials in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Alleghany, or the “Board,” from holders of Alleghany’s outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at our 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or the “2013 Annual Meeting,” and at any and all adjournments or postponements, for the purposes referred to herein and in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. These proxy materials are being mailed to stockholders on or about March 15, 2013.

References to “common stock” in this proxy statement refer to the common stock, par value $1.00 per share, of Alleghany unless the context otherwise requires.

Information About Voting

The Board has fixed the close of business on March 1, 2013 as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the 2013 Annual Meeting. Stockholders are entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held of record on the record date with respect to each matter to be acted on at the 2013 Annual Meeting. As of the close of business on March 1, 2013, there were 16,803,490 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.

The presence, in person or by proxy, of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock is required to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the 2013 Annual Meeting. Abstentions and “broker non-votes” (shares held by a broker or nominee that does not have discretionary authority to vote on a particular matter and has not received voting instructions from its client) are counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business at the 2013 Annual Meeting. Under applicable rules of the New York Stock Exchange, brokers may not use discretionary authority to vote shares of common stock held for clients on any of the matters to be considered at the 2013 Annual Meeting other than the ratification of our selection of Ernst & Young LLP as Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm. Accordingly, it is important that, if your shares are held by a broker, you provide instructions to your broker so that your votes with respect to the election of directors and the advisory vote on executive compensation are counted.

There are three ways to vote by proxy: by calling the toll free telephone number on the enclosed proxy card; by using the Internet as described on the enclosed proxy card; or by returning the enclosed proxy card in the envelope provided. If your shares are held by a broker you may vote by telephone or the Internet if those options are offered by your broker.


PROXY STATEMENT — TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERSPROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

   1  

ALLEGHANY QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT ALLEGHANY’S 2016 ANNUAL MEETING

8

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

   212  

Board of Directors

   212  

Director Independence

   3

Board Leadership

3

Board Role in Risk Oversight

312  

Committees of the Board of Directors

   413

Board Tenure

15

Board Leadership

15

Chief Executive Officer and Senior Management Succession Planning

15

Board Evaluation

16

Board Role in Risk Oversight

16

Directors Nominations and Qualifications

16  

Communications with Directors

   817  

Director Retirement Policy

   8

Related Party Transactions

817  

Codes of Ethics

   917  

Majority Election of Directors

   1017  

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

   1018

Hedging and Pledging Policies

18

Related Party Transactions

18

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

20

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

21  

SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

   1122  

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

   1324  

PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

   1425  

Nominees for Election

   1526  

Other Alleghany Directors

   1727  

Compensation of Directors

   2130  

PROPOSAL 2. RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL 20132016

   2432  

Audit Committee Report

   2733  

PROPOSAL 3. ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE OFFICERSCOMPENSATION

   2934  

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

   3135  

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS AND COMPENSATION MATTERS

   3237  

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

   3237  

Components of our 20122015 Compensation Program Summary

   3339  

Alleghany Performance in 20122015

   3540  

Alleghany Long-Term Performance

   36

Summary of Recent Changes and Adjustments to Executive Compensation Program in 2013

3741  

Compensation Committee Process

   3943  

ComponentsElements of 2015 Compensation

   4145  

Financial Statement Restatements

   4852

Hedging and Pledging Policies

52  

Executive Officer Stock Ownership Guidelines

   4852  

Tax Considerations

   4852  


Compensation Policies and Practices Relating to Risk Management

53

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

   5054  

Summary Compensation Table

   5054  

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 20122015

   5357  

Narrative Discussion Relating to the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

   5458  

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20122015 Fiscal Year-End

   6062  

20122015 Stock Vested

   61

Pension Benefits

6263  

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

   63

Pension Benefits

65  

PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENTPayments Upon Termination of Employment

   68

PROPOSAL 3. ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

72

ALL OTHER MATTERS THAT MAY COME BEFORE THE 2013 ANNUAL MEETING

7367  

STOCKHOLDER NOMINATIONS AND PROPOSALS

   74

SHARED ADDRESS STOCKHOLDERS70

74  

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

   7571  


PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERSPROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

This summary highlights selected information that is discussed in more detail elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. This summary does not contain all of the information you should consider, and you should read the full Proxy Statement before voting. Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Proxy Statement to “Alleghany,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us” refer to Alleghany Corporation, references to the “Board” refer to our Board of Directors, references to the “common stock” refer to our common stock, par value $1.00 per share, and references to the “2016 Annual Meeting” refer to our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and any and all adjournments or postponements thereof.

2016 ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION

Date and Time

Friday, April 22, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. local time

Location

The Penn Club of New York

30 West 44th Street

New York, New York

Record Date

March 1, 2016

Mailing Date

On or about March 17, 2016

MEETING AGENDA AND BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS

  Voting MatterBoard’s RecommendationAdditional
Information

  Proposal 1: Election of Directors

FOR each director nominee    pages 25 to 31

  Proposal 2: Selection of Independent Accounting Firm

FORpages 32 and 33

  Proposal 3: Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

FORpages 34 to 69

HOW TO VOTE (pages 8 and 9)

You can vote by any of the following table sets forthmethods:

By Internet

Go to the voting website, www.envisionreports.com/YAL

By Telephone

If you reside in the United States, Canada or U.S. territories, call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683)

By Mail

If you received a proxy card in the mail, complete, sign, date, and mail the proxy card in the return envelope provided to you

In person

Attend the Annual Meeting and vote by ballot

If you vote by the beneficial ownershipInternet or telephone, you must vote no later than 1:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on April 22, 2016.

-1-


BOARD NOMINEES (page 26)

Karen Brenner

Director since 2009

LOGOMs. Brenner has been an Executive Director of Law and Business Initiatives at New York University since 2012 and Clinical Professor of Business at the Leonard N. Stern School of Business at New York University since 2008.

John G. Foos

Director since 2012

LOGO

Mr. Foos currently serves as a director of Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina, a South Carolina-owned and operated health insurance carrier, the HAI Group Companies, a provider of niche insurance programs and services for the public and affordable housing community, and Emerald Shelter Group, a not-for-profit that provides healthcare and affordable housing.

GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Board Independence

Nine of our ten directors are independent directors. All of our standing Board committees are chaired by independent directors. Our Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Governance Committees are 100 percent independent.

Board Structure

Our Board is divided into three separate classes of directors. At each Annual Meeting of Stockholders, one class of directors is elected to a term of three years.

Risk Oversight

Our Board and its committees work with management to diligently monitor and manage risk.

Independent Chairman

Our current Chairman is an independent director. Our policy is that the Chairman should not be an Alleghany officer.
Board and Committee EvaluationsOur annual Board and committee evaluation processes help promote the effectiveness of the Board and its committees.

Director Tenure

Our Board has an average tenure of ten years, with half of our current directors joining the Board in 2009 or later.
Stock Ownership GuidelinesExecutive officers are required to hold shares of common stock valued at three to five times their base salary (varies depending on position). Directors are required to hold common stock and/or restricted stock units valued at least five times the annual board retainer within five years of election to the Board. We have a policy prohibiting hedging and pledging of our common stock by directors and executive officers to discourage excessive risk-taking.

-2-


PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

2015 and long-term financial results highlights are as follows:

2015 Performance

4.4% increase in common stockholders’ equity per share to $486.02 at 2015 year-end from $465.51 at 2014 year-end.

Transatlantic Holdings, Inc., or “TransRe,” and RSUI Group, Inc. or “RSUI,” which together account for 90% of our consolidated stockholders’ equity, produced high single-digit returns on equity on an operating basis (excluding net realized capital gains or losses and other-than-temporary impairment charges). Investment returns, however, were weak in 2015 resulting in slightly lower growth in book value for each person who, based upon filingscompany relative to the return on equity, consistent with the lackluster performance of all investment classes generally in 2015.

Net earnings of $560.3 million in 2015, compared with $679.2 million in 2014, primarily reflecting higher other-than-temporary impairment losses in 2015 compared with 2014.

Consolidated Alleghany underwriting profit of $466.6 million in 2015, compared with $494.8 million in 2014, and a consolidated combined ratio of 89.0% in 2015, compared with 88.8% in 2014, reflecting continued positive underwriting results at TransRe and RSUI.

Alleghany made progress in building Alleghany Capital Corporation’s portfolio of non-financial business investments by such personacquiring IPS-Integrated Project Services, LLC, or “IPS.”

Additional information regarding Alleghany’s 2015 results, including audited consolidated financial statements, as well as Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, or “MD&A,” with respect to 2015 results, is contained in Alleghany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, or the “Form 10-K,” which was filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the “SEC,” wason February 23, 2016. Readers are urged to review the beneficial ownerForm 10-K for a more complete discussion of more than five percentAlleghany’s financial performance.

Long-Term Performance

We believe that Alleghany’s performance is best measured over the long term, and that long-term growth in common stockholders’ equity per share is the best metric for evaluating such performance. In this regard, the table below shows the annual, and three- and ten-year average rolling, annualized growth in our outstanding common stock.stockholders’ equity per share during the five-year period from December 31, 2010 to December 31, 2015:

 

  Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership of Common  Stock(1) 

Name and Address

of Beneficial Owner

 Sole Voting
Power and/or Sole
Investment Power
  Shared Voting Power
and/or Shared
Investment Power
  Total  Percent
of Class
 

Davis Selected Advisers, L.P.

  2,054,010        2,054,010(2)    12.2  

2949 East Elvira Road,

Suite 101, Tucson,

AZ 85756

    

BlackRock, Inc

  1,064,194        1,064,194(3)    6.3  

40 East 52nd Street,

New York, NY 10022

    

Artisan Partners Holdings LP

      982,223    982,223(4)    5.8  

875 E. Wisconsin Avenue,

Suite 800, Milwaukee,

WI 53202

    
   Common
Stockholders’
Equity
Per  Share($)(1)
   Annual
Growth
       
      Rolling Annualized Average 

Year

     Three-Year  Ten-Year 

2010

   325.31     10.4    5.0    8.7  

2011

   342.12     5.2    8.6    7.7  

2012

   379.13     10.8    8.7    8.8  

2013

   412.96     8.9    8.3    8.5  

2014

   465.51     12.7    10.8    8.6  

2015

   486.02     4.4    8.6    8.6  

Average

     8.7  8.3  8.5

 

(1)TheAdjusted for subsequent stock ownership informationdividends

-3-


As can be seen in the table above, Alleghany’s common stockholders’ equity per share has compounded over the various time metrics in the mid-range of Alleghany’s stated financial objective of 7-10% annual growth in common stockholders’ equity per share.

The chart below summarizes Alleghany’s common stockholders’ equity per share growth and stock price performance over the ten-year period from December 31, 2005 to December 31, 2015, compared with the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index, or the “S&P 500,” with all values indexed to December 31, 2005. During this ten-year period, Alleghany’s common stockholders’ equity per share increased at a compound annual rate of 8.6%, compared with a compound annual rate of return of 7.3% for the S&P 500, and the price of Alleghany common stock (adjusted for stock dividends) appreciated at a 6.6% compound annual rate of return.

LOGO

As indicated by the data presented in the chart above, Alleghany’s growth in common stockholders’ equity per share has been relatively consistent. The trading price of Alleghany’s common stock has been more volatile, reflecting the volatility of the stock market in general. In Alleghany’s view, growth in common stockholders’ equity per share is a better measure of fundamental value creation as compared to the more volatile trading price of Alleghany’s common stock. As such, Alleghany focuses its executive compensation program on building common stockholders’ equity per share over time. As is shown in the chart, Alleghany’s growth in common stockholders’ equity per share has exceeded that of the S&P 500 return over the past ten years and is considerably less volatile.

COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

Compensation Philosophy

Our executive compensation program is intended to provide competitive total compensation to each of Alleghany’s executive officers (as listed on page 21), or the “Named Executive Officers,” that is aligned with the interests of our stockholders in increasing our common stockholders’ equity per share at rates of 7-10% over the long term without employing excessive amounts of financial leverage and without taking imprudent risks. This approach enables us to manage risk to avoid loss of capital during periods of economic turmoil, which we believe creates maximum value for stockholders in the long term, even if it results in lower levels of capital appreciation during periods when economic conditions are more favorable.

-4-


For 2015, this compensation philosophy was evidenced by the following compensation highlights:

CEO total direct compensation (salary, annual incentive and long-term equity based awards) was $6.7 million, representing approximately 0.9% of 2015 pre-tax earnings and approximately 0.1% of 2015 revenues, and total direct compensation for our Named Executive Officers as a group was $17.1 million, representing approximately 2.4% of 2015 pre-tax earnings and approximately 0.4% of 2015 revenues.

85% of Mr. Hicks’s total direct compensation for 2015 was linked to performance, while performance-linked compensation for our other Named Executive Officers averaged 74% of total direct compensation in 2015.

Mr. Hicks’s 2015 total direct compensation decreased by 10% from 2014 total direct compensation, due to a lower annual incentive payout for 2015.

Annual incentive plan awards included a financial objective but also discretion given the nature of Alleghany’s business and long-term approach, with the discretionary aspect being restricted by the fact that payouts for 2015 were limited to the lesser of (i) approximately $5.7 million (representing the maximum potential payout for our Named Executive Officers as a group) or (ii) 3% of 2015 annual adjusted pre-tax earnings, if less than $5.7 million.

Long-term performance share awards were subject to goals that we believed would be challenging to meet in today’s low interest rate and volatile market environment and that are aligned with our corporate financial objective of long-term growth in book value, with no payout being made if threshold performance is not achieved, and with our CEO’s long-term incentives based 100% on performance.

Elements of 2015 Compensation

The principal elements of compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers in respect of 2015 consisted of:

salaries;

annual cash incentive compensation under the 2010 Management Incentive Plan, or “2010 MIP;”

annual grants of long-term equity-based incentives under the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan, or “2012 LTIP;” and

an annual savings benefit equal to 15% of base salary.

In addition, our Named Executive Officers receive a benefit, assuming the completion of five years of service with Alleghany or a subsidiary of Alleghany, under a retirement plan, although such benefit was frozen in 2013.

The percentage that these elements represent of the 2015 compensation for our chief executive officer and our other Named Executive Officers is reflected below.

LOGO

-5-


2015 Named Executive Officer Compensation

The following table sets forth the compensation of our Named Executive Officers during 2015, as calculated in accordance with applicable SEC regulations. For a complete schedule and related footnotes, please see the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 54 in the Executive Compensation section of this Proxy Statement.

Name and

Principal Position

 Salary  Bonus  Stock
Awards
  Non-Equity
Incentive  Plan
Compensation
  Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
  All Other
Compensation
  Total 

Weston M. Hicks

 $1,000,000       $4,026,509   $1,700,000       $166,176   $6,892,685  

President and chief executive officer

       

Joseph P. Brandon

  800,000        2,415,815    1,620,000        132,716    4,968,531  

Executive Vice President

       

Christopher K. Dalrymple

  630,000        951,133    614,250        103,890    2,299,273  

Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary

       

Roger B. Gorham

  600,000        271,557    270,000    256,464    100,572    1,498,593  

Senior Vice President - Head of Fixed Income and Treasurer

       

John L. Sennott, Jr.

  630,000        951,133    614,250        104,422    2,299,805  

Senior Vice President and chief financial officer

       

-6-


Long-Term Compensation Highlights

During the ten-year performance period set out in the graph on page 4, we believe that Mr. Hicks’s compensation has been well-aligned with Alleghany’s long-term performance as can be seen in the table below:

10-year Pay-TSR(1) Alignment

($ in thousands)

LOGO

                                   CAGR 

Year

 2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  1 Year  3 Year  10 Year 

CEO Total Compensation(2)

  3,781    4,566    6,522    6,435    6,206    5,636    7,347    7,332    6,216    10,543    6,869    (34.8%)   (2.1%)   6.2

Pension Value Increase/(Decrease)

  850    856    1,160    1,594    1,066    822    1,922    1,259    (1,232  2,914    (23   

CEO SCT Compensation Excluding Pension(3)

  2,931    3,710    5,361    4,840    5,140    4,814    5,425    6,072    7,448    7,629    6,892    (9.7%)   4.3  8.9

Indexed TSR

  100    131    147    105    105    119    113    133    159    184    189    3.1  12.5  6.6

TSR vs. CEO Compensation (excl. pension) Increases / Decreases

  

  12.8%   8.2  (2.3%) 

Indexed BVPS Growth

  100    115    132    126    139    153    161    178    194    219    228    4.4  8.6  8.6

BVPS vs. CEO Compensation (excl. pension) Increases / Decreases

  

  14.1%   4.3  (0.3%) 

(1)Total Shareholder Return reflects Alleghany share price appreciation including the table is asimpact of March 1, 2013. As of such date, there were 16,803,490 shares of common stock outstanding.dividends.

 

(2)AccordingIncludes annual fluctuation in pension value. Calculated according to an amendment dated February 14,SEC rules except for 2013 toand 2015, which include a Schedule 13G statement filed jointly by Davis Selected Advisers, L.P., an investment adviser (“Davis Advisers”), and Davis New York Venture Fund,negative value for Mr. Hicks’s pension benefit. SEC rules require that negative pension value changes are reflected as a registered investment company, Davis Advisers have sole voting power over 1,884,618 shares of common stock, no voting power over 169,392 shares of common stock and sole dispositive power over 2,054,010 shares of common stock. The statement indicated that the shares have been purchased and held for investment purposes on behalf of client accounts over which Davis Advisers has either sole or shared discretionary dispositive or voting power, that beneficial ownership on the part of Davis Advisers is expressly disclaimed, as permitted by Rule 13d-4 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that all purchases of shares were made for investment purposes only and“zero” in the ordinary course of business of Davis Advisers as a registered investment advisor.table.

 

(3)According to a Schedule 13G statement dated February 4, 2013.Represents CEO compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 54, excluding annual fluctuation in pension value.

 

-1--7-


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT ALLEGHANY’S 2016 ANNUAL MEETING

(4)Q:AccordingWhy did I receive these proxy materials?

A:You have received these proxy materials because the Board is soliciting your proxy to an amendment dated February 7, 2013 to a Schedule 13G statement filed jointly by Artisan Partners Holdings LP (“Artisan Holdings”), Artisan Partners Limited Partnership, an investment adviser (“Artisan Partners”), Artisan Investment Corporation, the general partner of Artisan Holdings (“Artisan Corp.”), Artisan Investments GP LLC, the general partner of Artisan Partners, ZFIC, Inc., the sole stockholder of Artisan Corp. (“ZFIC”), Artisan Partners Funds, Inc. (“Artisan Funds”) and Andrew A. Ziegler and Carlene M. Ziegler, the principal stockholders of ZFIC (who, together with Artisan Holdings, Artisan Partners, Artisan Corp., ZFIC and Artisan Funds, are referred to herein as the “Artisan Parties”), the Artisan Parties share voting and dispositive power over 948,123vote your shares of common stock and share dispositive power over an additional 34,100at the 2016 Annual Meeting.

Q:Who is entitled to vote at the 2016 Annual Meeting?

A:Alleghany has one class of voting stock outstanding: its common stock. If you were a holder of common stock at the close of business on March 1, 2016, the record date for the 2016 Annual Meeting, you are entitled to vote at the meeting. At the close of business on March 1, 2016, there were 15,449,750 shares of common stock. The statement indicatedstock outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share of common stock has one vote.

Q:How can I vote my shares?

A:You can vote your shares in two ways: either by proxy or in person at the 2016 Annual Meeting by written ballot. If you choose to vote by proxy, you may do so using the Internet, telephone or, if you received a printed copy of your proxy materials, mail. Each of these procedures is more fully explained below. Even if you plan to attend the 2016 Annual Meeting in person, the Board recommends that you vote promptly by proxy to ensure that your shares are represented at the 2016 Annual Meeting.

Q:How can I vote my shares by proxy?

A:Because many stockholders cannot attend the 2016 Annual Meeting in person, it is necessary that a large number of stockholders be represented by proxy. You may vote your proxy using the Internet, telephone or, if you received a printed copy of your proxy materials, mail, each as more fully explained below. In the case of voting your proxy using the Internet or telephone, the deadline for voting is 1:00 a.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) on Friday, April 22, 2016. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, please see the voting instructions provided by such party.

Vote by Internet

To vote your shares hadvia the Internet, go to the voting website, www.envisionreports.com/YAL. Internet voting is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. You will have the opportunity to confirm that your instructions have been acquiredproperly recorded. Our Internet voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholders through individual control numbers. If you vote via the Internet, you may incur costs such as Internet access fees for which you will be responsible.If you received a proxy card in the mail and choose to vote via the Internet, you do not need to return your proxy card.

Vote by Telephone

If you reside in the United States, Canada or U.S. territories, you can vote your shares by telephone by calling the toll-free number provided on behalfthe voting website www.envisionreports.com/YAL and on the proxy card. Telephone voting is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow you to vote your shares and confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. Our telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholders through individual control numbers.If you received a proxy card in the mail and choose to vote by telephone, you do not need to return your proxy card.

Vote by Mail

If you received a printed copy of discretionary clientsyour proxy materials, you can vote your shares by completing and mailing the enclosed proxy card to us so that we receive it by the deadline.

-8-


If you properly sign and return your proxy card or submit your proxy using the Internet or telephone, your shares will be voted as you direct. If you sign and return your proxy card but do not specify how to vote, we will vote your shares in accordance with the Board’s recommendations: “FOR” each of the Board’s nominees for director; “FOR” the ratification of the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm; and “FOR” the advisory resolution on executive compensation.

Q:How can I vote my shares in person?

A:If you wish to vote in person at the 2016 Annual Meeting, written ballots will be available at the meeting. If your shares are held in the name of Artisan Partners, personsa bank, broker or other than Artisan Partnersholder of record, you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from that holder of record to be able to vote in person at the 2016 Annual Meeting. Voting by proxy, whether by Internet, telephone or mail, will not limit your right to vote at the 2016 Annual Meeting if you decide to attend in person. However, if you vote by proxy and also attend the 2016 Annual Meeting, there is no need to vote in person at the meeting unless you wish to change your vote.

Q:How can I attend the 2016 Annual Meeting?

A:You are entitled to attend the 2016 Annual Meeting if you were a stockholder of Alleghany as of the close of business on March 1, 2016, the record date, or if you hold a valid proxy for the 2016 Annual Meeting. You should be prepared to present photo identification for admittance. If you are a stockholder of record, your name will be verified against the list of stockholders of record on the record date prior to your admission to the 2016 Annual Meeting. If you are not a stockholder of record, but hold shares through a broker, bank or nominee (i.e., in street name), you should provide proof of beneficial ownership on the record date, such as your most recent account statement prior to March 1, 2016, a copy of the voting instruction card provided by your broker, bank or nominee, or other similar evidence of ownership. If you do not provide photo identification or comply with the other procedures outlined above, you may not be admitted to the 2016 Annual Meeting.

The 2016 Annual Meeting will begin promptly on April 22, 2016, at 10:00 a.m., local time. You should allow adequate time for check-in procedures.

Q:Can I change my vote?

A:Yes. You can change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised at the 2016 Annual Meeting by taking any one of the following actions: (1) follow the instructions given for changing your vote via the Internet or by telephone or deliver a valid written proxy with a later date than the previous proxy; (2) notify the Secretary of Alleghany in writing that you have revoked your proxy (using the address in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders above); or (3) vote in person by written ballot at the 2016 Annual Meeting. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, you must contact that holder of record to revoke a previously authorized proxy.

Q:How many shares must be present to conduct the 2016 Annual Meeting?

A:A quorum comprising the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Alleghany’s common stock on the record date, or 7,724,876 shares, must be present in person or represented by proxy for the transaction of business at the 2016 Annual Meeting. Abstentions and “broker non-votes” (which are explained below) are counted as present to determine whether there is a quorum for the 2016 Annual Meeting.

Q:What if I am a beneficial owner and do not give instructions to my broker?

A:

If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, you are considered the beneficial owner of those shares, but not the record holder. As a beneficial owner, in order to ensure your shares are voted in the way you would like, you must provide voting instructions to your broker by the

-9-


deadline provided in the proxy materials you receive all dividends from and proceeds fromyour broker. Under the salerules of the New York Stock Exchange, or the “NYSE,” unless you provide specific voting instructions, your broker is not permitted to vote your shares on your behalf, except with respect to the ratification of the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 2). For your vote on any other matter to be counted, you will need to provide voting instructions to your broker before the date of the 2016 Annual Meeting using the instructions provided by your broker.

A “broker non-vote” occurs when your broker submits a proxy for your shares but does not indicate a vote for a particular proposal because the broker does not have authority to vote on that proposal and has not received voting instructions from you. “Broker non-votes” are counted as present to determine whether there is a quorum for the 2016 Annual Meeting, but are not counted as votes for or against the proposal in question or as abstentions, nor are they counted to determine the number of votes present for the particular proposal.

Q:What vote is required to pass each of the proposals at the 2016 Annual Meeting?

A:Proposal 1: Election of Directors. Each of the two nominees for director who receives at least a majority of the votes cast with respect to the election of such shares,nominee will be elected. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the results of this vote. In accordance with the majority voting standard in Alleghany’s By-Laws, or the “By-Laws,” and the Corporate Governance Guidelines of Alleghany, or the “Corporate Governance Guidelines,” as a condition of his or her nomination, each nominee is required to tender to the knowledgeBoard at the time of nomination an irrevocable resignation, effective if such nominee does not receive the majority vote required by the By-Laws and the Board determines to accept such resignation. In the event that a director nominee fails to receive the requisite majority vote, the Nominating and Governance Committee will evaluate such resignation and make a recommendation to the Board as to whether it should accept the resignation.

Proposal 2: Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal is required to ratify the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the results of this vote.

Proposal 3: Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal is required to approve the advisory resolution on executive compensation. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the results of this vote. Although this proposal is non-binding on the Board, the Board and the Compensation Committee will review and consider the voting results when making future decisions about Alleghany’s executive compensation program.

Q:How does the Board recommend I vote?

A:The Board recommends that you vote as follows on each proposal:

  Voting MatterBoard’s Recommendation

  Proposal 1: Election of Directors

FOR each director nominee    

  Proposal 2: Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered

                          Public Accounting Firm

FOR

  Proposal 3: Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

FOR

Q:What happens if a nominee for director does not stand for election?

A:If for any reason any nominee does not stand for election, any proxies we receive will be voted in favor of the Artisan Parties none of such persons has an economic interestremaining nominees and may be voted for a substitute nominee in more than 5%place of the class.nominee who does not stand. We have no reason to expect that either of the nominees will not stand for election.

-10-


Q:What happens if additional matters are presented at the 2016 Annual Meeting?

A:If any matters other than the three items of business described in this Proxy Statement are properly presented for consideration at the 2016 Annual Meeting, persons named on the voting website and your proxy card will have discretion to vote for you on those matters. At the time this Proxy Statement was printed, we knew of no other matters to be raised at the 2016 Annual Meeting.

Q:Who nominates the directors?

A:Karen Brenner and John G. Foos have been nominated by the Board for election as directors at the 2016 Annual Meeting. Each of the nominees is a current member of the Board and was recommended to the Board for nomination by the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee will receive at any time and will consider from time to time suggestions from stockholders as to proposed director candidates, as described under “Director Nominations and Qualifications” on pages 16 and 17. Additionally, stockholders may nominate individuals for election as directors in accordance with the requirements set forth in the By-Laws and described under “Stockholder Nominations and Proposals” on page 70.

Q:How are proxies solicited and what is the cost?

A:We pay the cost of soliciting proxies for the meeting. Proxies may be solicited in person by our employees, or by mail, courier, telephone, facsimile or e-mail. In addition, we have retained Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc. to aid in the solicitation of proxies by mail, courier, telephone, facsimile and e-mail. We expect to pay a fee of approximately $9,500 plus expenses to Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc. for these services.

Q:What is householding? Does Alleghany use it?

A:In accordance with a notice sent to eligible stockholders who share a single address, we are sending only one annual report to stockholders and one proxy statement to that address unless we received instructions to the contrary from any stockholder at that address. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce our printing and postage costs.

If, in the future, you wish to receive a separate annual report to stockholders and proxy statement, a separate copy may be obtained, without charge, upon written or oral request to the office of the Secretary, Alleghany Corporation, 7 Times Square Tower, New York, New York 10036, telephone number (212) 752-1356. Eligible stockholders of record who receive multiple copies of our annual report to stockholders and proxy statement can request householding by contacting us in the same manner. Stockholders who own shares through a bank, broker or other nominee can request householding by contacting the nominee. We hereby undertake to deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the annual report to stockholders and proxy statement to a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the document was delivered.

Q:Where can I find more information about Alleghany?

A:Alleghany’s website address is www.alleghany.com. Alleghany makes available, free of charge on its website, the documents it files with the SEC. Also available on Alleghany’s website are its Financial Personnel Code of Ethics, Employee Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines, and the charters for the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Governance Committees. The information contained on Alleghany’s website is not included as a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Proxy Statement.

-11-


ALLEGHANY CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board of Directors

Pursuant to Alleghany’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws, the Board is divided into three separate classes of directors, which are required to be as nearly equal in number as practicable. At each Annual Meeting of Stockholders, one class of directors is elected to a term of three years. Currently, there are three standing committees of the Board, consisting of an Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee. Additional information regarding these committees is set out below.on pages 13 through 15.

Alleghany’sThe Board currently consists of twelveten directors. UponMr. Stephen P. Bradley, who has served as a director of Alleghany since 2012, and Mr. Thomas S. Johnson, who has served as a director of Alleghany since 1997 and for 1992-1993, are retiring from the closing of Alleghany’s acquisition of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc., or “Transatlantic,” on March 6, 2012,Board effective at the 2016 Annual Meeting in accordance with Alleghany’s director retirement policy as described on page 17. In this regard, because Mr. Bradley and Mr. Johnson are not standing for re-election, in order to make the termsclasses of the merger agreement, three former members ofBoard as nearly equal in size as practicable, the board of directors of Transatlantic, Stephen P. Bradley, Ian H. Chippendale andBoard determined to nominate Mr. John G. Foos, were appointed aswho was last elected to the Board at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to stand for re-election at the 2016 Annual Meeting. As a result, the directors nominated by the Board for election at the 2016 Annual Meeting to the class of Alleghany, with one2019 are Ms. Brenner and Mr. Foos. If both of such new directors being appointed to eachMs. Brenner and Mr. Foos are elected, the size of the Board’s three classes.Board will be reduced effective at the 2016 Annual Meeting from ten to eight directors.

We have strong director engagement on our Board. The Board held eight meetings in 2012.2015. Each director who served as a director of Alleghany any time during 2012our directors attended more than 75%at least 96 percent of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and meetings of the committees of the Board on which he or she served that were held in 2012. There are three regularly scheduled executive2015, with nine of our current ten directors attending 100 percent of the Board and committee meetings. Executive sessions for independent directors of Alleghanyare held at each year.regularly scheduled Board meeting. The Chairman of the Board, or the “Chairman,” who is currently an independent director, presides at these executive sessions. Alleghany does not have a policy with regard to attendance by directors at Annual Meetings of Stockholders. Two directors attended the 20122015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

-2-


Director Independence

Pursuant to the New York Stock Exchange’sNYSE’s listing standards, Alleghany is required to have a majority of independent directors, and no director qualifies as independent unless the Board affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with Alleghany. The Board has determined that Rex D. Adams, Stephen P. Bradley, Karen Brenner, Ian H. Chippendale, John G. Foos, Jefferson W. Kirby, William K. Lavin, Thomas S. Johnson, Phillipnone of our directors, except Weston M. Martineau, James F. WillHicks, our President and Raymond L.M. Wong have nochief executive officer, has any material relationship with Alleghany (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with Alleghany) other than in their capacities as members of the Board and committees thereof, and thus are independent directors of Alleghany. As a result, elevenTherefore, nine of Alleghany’s ten current twelve directors are independent directors. AllBoth of the director nominees, Ms. Brenner and Messrs. Bradley, Johnson and Will,Mr. Foos, are independent. In addition, Dan R. Carmichael, who retiredFollowing the retirement of Mr. Bradley and Mr. Johnson at the 2016 Annual Meeting, and assuming that both Ms. Brenner and Mr. Foos are elected, the size of the Board will be reduced effective at the 2016 Annual Meeting from ten to eight directors, seven of whom will be independent.

-12-


Committees of the Board of Directors

Committee Membership

The following table sets forth the current members of each of the committees and the number of meetings held during 2015:

Name

  

Audit

  

Compensation

  

Nominating and
Governance

Stephen P. Bradley

  ü    ü

Karen Brenner

  ü    Chair

Ian H. Chippendale

    Chair  

John G. Foos

  ü    ü

Thomas S. Johnson

    ü  ü

William K. Lavin

  Chair  ü  

Phillip M. Martineau

    ü  ü

Raymond L.M. Wong

  ü  ü  

2015 meetings

  7  6  5

The Board has determined that each committee member is independent as defined in the NYSE’s listing standards with respect to membership on each committee on which he or she serves. The Board also has determined that each member of the Audit Committee has the qualifications set forth in the NYSE’s listing standards regarding financial literacy and accounting or related financial management expertise, and is an audit committee financial expert as defined by the SEC.

Committee Responsibilities

Each of the committees listed below operates pursuant to a directorcharter, a copy of which is available on Alleghany’s website at www.alleghany.com or may be obtained, without charge, upon written request to the Secretary of Alleghany effectiveat Alleghany’s principal executive offices. The primary functions of each committee are as follows:

Board CommitteeResponsibilities

Audit Committee

•  Directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of our independent registered public accounting firm, including approving in advance all audit services and permissible non-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm.

•  Directly responsible for the evaluation of such firm’s qualifications, performance and independence.

•  Reviews and makes reports and recommendations to the Board with respect to the following matters:

•  the audited consolidated annual financial statements of Alleghany and its subsidiaries, including Alleghany’s specific disclosures under MD&A, and critical accounting estimates, to be included in Alleghany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC, and whether to recommend this inclusion;

-13-


Board CommitteeResponsibilities

•  the unaudited consolidated quarterly financial statements of Alleghany and its subsidiaries, including MD&A, to be included in Alleghany’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC;

•  Alleghany’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management;

•  the adequacy and effectiveness of Alleghany’s internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures;

•  the compensation, activities and performance of Alleghany’s internal auditor; and

•  the quality and acceptability of Alleghany’s accounting policies, including critical accounting estimates and practices and the estimates and assumptions used by management in the preparation of Alleghany’s financial statements.

Compensation Committee

•  Administers Alleghany’s executive compensation program, including Alleghany’s 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan, or the “2007 LTIP,” 2012 LTIP, the 2010 MIP, and 2015 Management Incentive Plan, or the “2015 MIP.”

•  Reviews and approves the financial goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the chief executive officer; evaluates the chief executive officer’s performance in light of such goals and objectives; and determines the chief executive officer’s compensation based on such evaluation.

•  Reviews the annual recommendations of the chief executive officer concerning:

•  the compensation of the other Alleghany officers and proposed adjustments to such officers’ compensation; and

•  the adjustments proposed to be made to the compensation of the three most highly paid officers of each Alleghany operating subsidiary as recommended by the compensation committee or board of directors (as applicable) for each such operating subsidiary.

•  Reports on the actions described above to the Board and makes recommendations with respect to such actions to the Board as the committee may deem appropriate.

•  Reviews the compensation of the directors on an annual basis, including compensation for service on committees of the Board, and proposing changes, as appropriate, to the Board.

-14-


Board CommitteeResponsibilities

Nominating and Governance Committee

•  Identifies and screens director candidates, consistent with criteria approved by the Board.

•  Makes recommendations to the Board as to persons to be (i) nominated by the Board for election to the Board by stockholders or (ii) chosen by the Board to fill newly created directorships or vacancies on the Board.

•  Develops and recommends to the Board a set of corporate governance principles applicable to Alleghany.

•  Oversees the evaluation of the Board, individual directors and Alleghany’s management.

Board Tenure

We believe that it is important to achieve an appropriate balance on the Board between the number of our longer-tenured directors who have a deep knowledge of Alleghany, and the 2012 Annual Meetingnumber of Stockholders, qualified as an independent director during hisnewer directors who provide fresh perspectives. The chart below shows the breakdown by years of service on the Board. To help spur periodic change on the Board, in 2012.our Corporate Governance Guidelines set a mandatory retirement age, as described on page 17, after which directors may no longer be nominated or re-nominated to the Board.

LOGO

Board Leadership

Currently, the position of Chairman and the position of President and chief executive officer are separate. It is the policy of the Board that the Chairman should not be an Alleghany officer. The current Chairman is an independent director. Pursuant to the Corporate Governance Guidelines, of Alleghany, or the “Corporate Governance Guidelines,” the duties of the Chairman include providing leadership to the Board in managing the business of the Board and ensuring that there is an effective structure for the operation of the Board and its committees. The Board believes that its leadership structure is appropriate given the historical development of the composition of the Board and management, the Corporate Governance Guidelines and the significant tenure of a majority of the Board members.

Chief Executive Officer and Senior Management Succession Planning

A key responsibility of our chief executive officer and Board in the area of risk management is ensuring that an effective process is in place to provide continuity of leadership over the long-term. At least once each year, our Board conducts a review of chief executive officer and senior management succession planning. During this review, the chief executive officer provides the Board with recommendations on, and evaluations of, potential chief executive officer and senior management successors, succession timing for those positions, and

-15-


development plans for the potential successors. Our Board reviews potential internal senior management candidates with our chief executive officer, including the qualifications, experience and development priorities for these individuals. Further, our Board periodically reviews the overall composition of our senior management’s qualifications, tenure and experience.

Our Board, in coordination with our Nominating and Governance Committee, also establishes steps to address emergency chief executive officer and senior management succession planning in extraordinary circumstances. Our emergency chief executive officer succession planning is intended to enable us to respond to unexpected position vacancies, including those resulting from a major catastrophe, by continuing our operation and minimizing potential disruption or loss of continuity to our business and operations.

Board Evaluation

Each year, the Board and each of its committees conducts an evaluation of their respective performance, effectiveness and fulfillment of fiduciary duties. The evaluation process is overseen by the Nominating and Governance Committee and is reviewed annually to determine whether it is designed effectively and assure that appropriate feedback is being sought and reviewed. The Board evaluation is done anonymously to encourage candid feedback, supplemented by individual director interviews with the Chairman. The results of the Board and committee evaluations are reported to and reviewed by the full Board. In general, in 2015 the Board and each committee were satisfied with their respective performance and considered themselves to be operating effectively, with appropriate balance among governance, oversight, strategic and operational matters.

Board Role in Risk Oversight

The Board oversees risk management directly and through its Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Governance Committee.committees. In addition, Alleghany management has several committees that it uses to monitor and manage risk at Alleghany and its subsidiaries, including aan Enterprise Risk Management, or “ERM,” Committee, Reinsurance Security Committee and Ethics and Legal Compliance Committee. Alleghany management regularly reports to the Board and, as appropriate, to theits committees of the Board on management’s risk activities, Alleghany’s exposure and risk tolerances.assessments. ERM is a standing agenda item at each Board meeting and the chief risk officer, Alleghany management and Board discuss existing and emerging risks, controls and procedures, risk assessments and initiatives at such meetings. Each year, at the Board’s December or January meeting, the Board receives a formal report on enterprise risk management from Alleghany’s chief risk officer and, at the same meeting, considers Alleghany’s five-year

-3-


three-year financial estimates and the evaluation of the President and chief executive officer, allowing the Board to consider risk and risk management in the context of Alleghany’s strategic plan and management’s performance. AtEach year, at the Audit Committee’s June meeting, it receives a formal report on enterprise risk management from Alleghany’s chief risk officer and a formal report on legal compliance from Alleghany’s chief compliance officer, which isare also copied to the Board, and the Audit Committeechief risk officer and chief compliance officer subsequently reportsreport thereon to the Board. The Board receives updates on material developments with respect to risk management and legal compliance matters at its other regularly scheduled meetings. The Compensation Committee regularly monitors compensation policies, practices and outstanding awards to determine whether Alleghany’s risk management and incentive objectives are being met with respect to group-wide employee incentives. The Board believes that risk oversight is a responsibility of the entire Board, and it does not look to any individual director or committee to lead it in discharging this responsibility.

Committees of the Board of Directors Nominations and Qualifications

Audit Committee

The current members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Lavin (Chairman), Adams, Foos and Wong and Ms. Brenner. The Board has determined that each of these members has the qualifications set forth in the New York Stock Exchange’s listing standards regarding financial literacy and accounting or related financial management expertise, and is an audit committee financial expert as defined by the SEC. The Board has also determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee is independent as defined in the New York Stock Exchange’s listing standards. The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a Charter, a copy of which is available on Alleghany’s website at www.alleghany.com or may be obtained, without charge, upon written request to the Secretary of Alleghany at Alleghany’s principal executive offices. Pursuant to its Charter, the Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the independent registered public accounting firm, including approving in advance all audit services and permissible non-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee is also directly responsible for the evaluation of such firm’s qualifications, performance and independence. The Audit Committee also reviews and makes reports and recommendations to the Board with respect to the following matters:

the audited consolidated annual financial statements of Alleghany and its subsidiaries, including Alleghany’s specific disclosures under management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operation and critical accounting estimates, to be included in Alleghany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC and whether to recommend this inclusion;

the unaudited consolidated quarterly financial statements of Alleghany and its subsidiaries, including management’s discussion and analysis thereof, to be included in Alleghany’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC;

-4-


Alleghany’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management;

the adequacy and effectiveness of Alleghany’s internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures;

the compensation, activities and performance of Alleghany’s internal auditor; and

the quality and acceptability of Alleghany’s accounting policies, including critical accounting estimates and practices and the estimates and assumptions used by management in the preparation of Alleghany’s financial statements.

The Audit Committee held nine meetings in 2012.

Compensation Committee

The current members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Will (Chairman), Chippendale, Johnson, Lavin, Martineau and Wong, each of whom the Board has determined is independent as defined in the New York Stock Exchange’s listing standards. The Compensation Committee operates pursuant to a Charter, a copy of which is available on Alleghany’s website at www.alleghany.com or may be obtained, without charge, upon written request to the Secretary of Alleghany at Alleghany’s principal executive offices. Alleghany’s executive compensation program is administered by the Compensation Committee. Pursuant to its Charter, the Compensation Committee is, among other things, charged with:

reviewing and approving the financial goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the chief executive officer;

evaluating the chief executive officer’s performance in light of such goals and objectives; and

determining the chief executive officer’s compensation based on such evaluation.

In addition, the Compensation Committee also is responsible for reviewing the annual recommendations of the chief executive officer concerning:

the compensation of the other Alleghany officers and proposed adjustments to such officers’ compensation; and

the adjustments proposed to be made to the compensation of the three most highly paid officers of each Alleghany operating subsidiary as recommended by the compensation committee for each such operating subsidiary.

The Compensation Committee provides a report on the actions described above to the Board and makes recommendations with respect to such actions to the Board as the

-5-


Compensation Committee may deem appropriate. Compensation adjustments and awards are generally made annually by the Compensation Committee at a meeting in January.

In addition, the Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing the compensation of the directors on an annual basis, including compensation for service on committees of the Board, and proposing changes, as appropriate, to the Board. The Compensation Committee also administers Alleghany’s 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan, or the “2002 LTIP,” the 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan, or the “2007 LTIP,” the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan, or the “2012 LTIP,” and the 2010 Management Incentive Plan, or the “2010 MIP.”

Alleghany’s Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, Christopher K. Dalrymple, supports the Compensation Committee in its work. In addition, from January through September 2012, the Compensation Committee engaged Grahall Partners as independent outside compensation consultant. In September 2012, following a competitive process, the Compensation Committee engaged Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., or the “Compensation Consultant,” as independent outside compensation consultant to advise it on executive compensation matters. The Compensation Consultant also advised the Compensation Committee and management on various executive compensation matters involving Alleghany’s operating subsidiaries. The Chairman of the Compensation Committee reviews and approves all fees Alleghany pays to the Compensation Consultant.

The Compensation Committee held seven meetings in 2012.

Nominating and Governance Committee

The current members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are Messrs. Adams (Chairman), Bradley, Johnson, Martineau and Will and Ms. Brenner, each of whom the Board has determined is independent as defined in the New York Stock Exchange’s listing standards. The Nominating and Governance Committee operates pursuant to a Charter, a copy of which is available on Alleghany’s website at www.alleghany.com or may be obtained, without charge, upon written requestidentifies and recommends candidates for election to the Secretary of Alleghany at Alleghany’s principal executive offices. Pursuant to its Charter, the Nominating and Governance Committee is charged with:

identifying and screening director candidates,Board, consistent with criteria approved by the Board;

making recommendationsBoard. The Board has not approved any specific criteria that must be met by each director nominee nor established a procedure for identifying and evaluating nominees for director. The Board believes that establishing such criteria is best left to an evaluation of Alleghany’s needs at the time that a nomination is considered. The Board generally seeks members with diverse business and professional backgrounds and outstanding integrity and judgment, and such other skills and experience as will enhance the Board’s ability to persons to be (i) nominated bybest serve Alleghany’s interests. As a general matter, the BoardNominating and Governance Committee does consider diversity in identifying and evaluating possible nominees for election to the Board by stockholders or (ii) chosen by the Board to fill newly created directorships or vacancies on the Board;director.

 

-6--16-


developing and recommending to the Board a set of corporate governance principles applicable to Alleghany; and

overseeing the evaluation of the Board, individual directors and Alleghany’s management.

The Nominating and Governance Committee will receive at any time and will consider from time to time suggestions from stockholders as to proposed director candidates. In this regard, a stockholder may submit a recommendation regarding a proposed director nominee in writing to the Nominating and Governance Committee in care of the Secretary of Alleghany at Alleghany’s principal executive offices. Any such persons recommended by a stockholder will be evaluated in the same manner as persons identified by the Nominating and Governance Committee.

The Board generally seeks members with diverse business and professional backgrounds and outstanding integrity and judgment, and such other skills and experience as will enhance the Board’s abilityA director is required to best serve Alleghany’s interests. The Board has not approved any specific criteria for nominees for director nor established a procedure for identifying and evaluating nominees for director. The Board believes that establishing such criteria is best left to an evaluation of Alleghany’s needs at the time that a nomination is to be considered. However, as a general matter,notify the Nominating and Governance Committee does consider diversity in identifying and evaluating possible nominees for director.

when a director’s principal occupation or business association changes substantially. The Nominating and Governance Committee held eight meetingswill consider whether any such change may materially interfere with the director’s service as a director of Alleghany and make a recommendation to the Board in 2012.this regard.

-7-


Communications with Directors

Interested parties may communicate directly with any individual director, the independent directors as a group or the Board as a whole by mailing such communication to the Secretary of Alleghany at Alleghany’s principal executive offices. Any such communications will be delivered unopened:

 

if addressed to a specific director, to such director;

 

if addressed to the independent directors, to the Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee who will report thereon to the independent directors; or

 

if addressed to the Board, to the Chairman of the Board who will report thereon to the Board.

Director Retirement Policy

Alleghany’s retirement policy for directors provides that a director must retire from the Board at the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders following his or her 75th birthday.

Codes of Ethics

Alleghany has adopted an Employee Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for all employees of Alleghany and its subsidiaries, a Financial Personnel Code of Ethics for its chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer and all other officers in its Finance Department, a Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for members of the Board, and the Corporate Governance Guidelines. A copy of each of these documents is available on Alleghany’s website at www.alleghany.com or may be obtained, without charge, upon written request to the Secretary of Alleghany at Alleghany’s principal executive offices. Alleghany will disclose on its website any substantive amendments to its codes of ethics and any waivers from the provisions of its codes of ethics made with respect to its chief executive officer, chief financial officer or chief accounting officer (or persons performing similar functions), as well as with respect to any other executive officer or any director of Alleghany.

Majority Election of Directors

The By-Laws provide for a majority voting standard for the election of directors for uncontested elections. In connection with such provision of the By-Laws, the Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that a director nominee, as a condition of his or her nomination, shall tender to the Board at the time of nomination an irrevocable resignation effective if such nominee fails to receive the majority vote required by the By-Laws and the Board determines to accept such resignation. In the event that a director nominee fails to receive the requisite majority vote, the Nominating and Governance Committee will evaluate such resignation in light of Alleghany’s

-17-


best interests and make a recommendation to the Board as to whether it should accept the resignation. In making its recommendation, the Nominating and Governance Committee may consider any factors it deems relevant, including:

the director’s qualifications;

the director’s past and expected future contributions to Alleghany;

the overall composition of the Board; and

whether accepting the tendered resignation would cause Alleghany to fail to meet any applicable rule or regulation, including the NYSE’s listing standards and federal securities laws.

The Board, by vote of independent directors other than the director whose resignation is being evaluated, will act on the tendered resignation and will publicly disclose its decision and rationale within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote.

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

Directors are expected to achieve ownership of common stock, or restricted stock units, having an aggregate value (based upon the higher of market value or book value) equal to at least five times the annual board retainer within five years of election to the Board, and to maintain such a level thereafter.

Hedging and Pledging Policies

Alleghany maintains a policy on insider trading and compliance that prohibits directors from directly or indirectly purchasing or using financial instruments designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of Alleghany securities that they own. In addition, under such policy, directors are prohibited from pledging Alleghany securities as collateral.

Related Party Transactions

The Board has adopted a written Related Party Transaction Policy, or “the Policy.” Pursuant to the Policy, all related party transactions must be approved in advance by the Board. Under the Policy, a related party transaction means any transaction, other than compensation for services as an officer or director authorized and approved by the Compensation Committee or the Board, in which Alleghany or any of its subsidiaries is a participant and in which any:any of the following persons has or will have a direct or indirect material interest:

 

any director or officer of AlleghanyAlleghany; or

 

any immediate family member of such director or officer, which means any child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, spouse, sibling, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law or sister-in-law and any person (other than a tenant or employee) sharing the household of such director or officer,officer.

has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. A person who has a position or relationship with a firm, corporation or other entity may be deemed to have an indirect interest in any transaction in which that entity engages. However, a person is not deemed to have an interest

-8-


if such interest arises only from such person’s position as a director of another corporation and/or such person’s direct and indirect ownership of less than 10% of the equity of such firm, corporation or other entity.

-18-


Under the Policy, all newly proposed related party transactions are referred to the Nominating and Governance Committee for review and consideration of its recommendation to the Board. Following this review, the related party transaction and the Nominating and Governance Committee’s analysis and recommendations are presented to the full Board (other than any directors interested in the transaction) for approval. The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews existing related party transactions annually, with the goals of ensuring that such transactions are being pursued in accordance with all of the understandings and commitments made at the time they were approved, ensuring that payments being made with respect to such transactions are appropriately reviewed and documented, and reaffirming that such transactions remain in the best interests of Alleghany. The Nominating and Governance Committee reports any such findings to the Board.

Upon the closing of the acquisition of Transatlantic on March 6, 2012, Joseph P. Brandon was named Executive Vice President of Alleghany. During the period from September 15, 2011 through the closing date, Mr. Brandon was engaged by Alleghany as a consultant. Mr. Brandon was paid consulting fees of $400,000 during fiscal 2012.

Codes of Ethics

Alleghany has adopted a Financial Personnel Code of Ethics for its chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer, vice president for tax matters and all professionals serving in a finance, accounting, treasury or tax role, and a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct for its directors, officers and employees, and the Corporate Governance Guidelines. Copies of each of these documents are available on Alleghany’s website at www.alleghany.com or may be obtained, without charge, upon written request to the Secretary of Alleghany at Alleghany’s principal executive offices. Alleghany will disclose on its website any substantive amendments to these Codes of Ethics and any waivers from the provisions of these Codes of Ethics made with respect to its chief executive officer, chief financial officer or chief accounting officer (or persons performing similar functions) as well as with respect to any other executive officer or any director of Alleghany.

 

-9--19-


Majority Election of DirectorsPRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

Alleghany’s By-Laws provide for a majority voting standard forThe following table sets forth the electionbeneficial ownership of directors for uncontested elections. In connectioneach person who, based upon filings made by such person with such provisionthe SEC, as of March 1, 2016, was the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the By-Laws, the Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that a director nominee, as a condition of his or her nomination, shall tender to the Board, at the time of nomination, an irrevocable resignation in the event that the director fails to receive the majority vote required by the By-Laws, effective upon the Board’s acceptance of such resignation. In the event that a director nominee fails to receive the requisite majority vote, the Nominating and Governance Committee will evaluate such resignation in light of Alleghany’s best interests and make a recommendation to the Board as to whether the Board should accept the resignation. In making its recommendation, the Nominating and Governance Committee may consider any factors it deems relevant, including:outstanding common stock.

 

the director’s qualifications;

   Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership of Common  Stock(1) 

Name and Address

of Beneficial Owner

  Sole Voting
Power and/or Sole
Investment Power
   Shared Voting Power
and/or Shared
Investment Power
   Total  Percent of
Class
 

BlackRock, Inc.

   1,346,829          1,346,829(2)   8.6  

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10022

       

The Vanguard Group

   1,013,420     17,208     1,030,628(3)   6.6  

100 Vanguard Boulevard

Malvern, PA 19355

       

 

the director’s past and expected future contributions to Alleghany;

(1)As of March 1, 2016, there were 15,449,750 shares of common stock outstanding.

 

the overall composition of the Board; and

(2)According to an amendment dated January 20, 2016 to a Schedule 13G statement filed by BlackRock, Inc., an investment advisory company (“BlackRock”), BlackRock has sole voting power over 1,218,480 shares of common stock and sole dispositive power over 1,346,829 shares of common stock.

 

(3)According to an amendment dated February 10, 2016 to a Schedule 13G statement filed by The Vanguard Group, an investment adviser (“Vanguard”), Vanguard has sole voting power over 14,808 shares of common stock, sole dispositive power over 1,013,420 shares of common stock and shared dispositive power over 17,208 shares of common stock.

whether accepting the tendered resignation would cause Alleghany to fail to meet any applicable rule or regulation (including the New York Stock Exchange’s listing standards and federal securities laws).

The Board, by vote of independent directors other than the director whose resignation is being evaluated, will act on the tendered resignation and will publicly disclose its decision and rationale within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote.-20-


Director Stock Ownership GuidelinesEXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Directors are expected to achieve ownershipThe name, age, current position, date elected and prior business experience of common stock, or equivalent common stock units, having an aggregate value (based uponeach of the higher of market value or book value) equal to at least five times the annual board retainer within five years of election to the Board, and to maintain such a level thereafter.Named Executive Officers is as follows:

Name

Age

Current Position (date elected)

Prior Business Experience

Weston M. Hicks

59President and chief executive officer (since December 2004)Executive Vice President, Alleghany (October 2002 to December 2004).

Joseph P. Brandon

57Executive Vice President (since March 2012)Consultant to Alleghany (September 2011 to March 2012); private investor (May 2008 to August 2011); Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, General Re Corporation, a property and casualty reinsurer and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (September 2001 to April 2008).

Christopher K. Dalrymple

48Senior Vice President (since January 2012), General Counsel (since July 2009) and Secretary (since January 2011)Vice President, Alleghany (December 2004 to January 2012); Associate General Counsel, Alleghany (March 2002 to July 2009) Assistant Secretary; Alleghany (March 2002 to January 2011).

Roger B. Gorham

53Senior Vice President — Head of Fixed Income and Treasurer (since May 2013)Senior Vice President — Finance and Investments and chief financial officer, Alleghany (January 2006 to May 2013); Senior Vice President — Finance and chief financial officer, Alleghany (May 2005 to January 2006); Senior Vice President — Finance, Alleghany (December 2004 to May 2005).

John L. Sennott, Jr.

50Senior Vice President (since April 2013) and chief financial officer (since May 2013)Consultant (April 2012 to April 2013); Executive Vice President and Chief Corporate Strategy Officer (January 2010 to April 2012) and Chief Operating Officer (October 2008 to January 2010), Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, AG, a property and casualty (re)insurer.

 

-10--21-


SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth, as of March 1, 2013,2016, the beneficial ownership of common stock of each of the nominees named for election as a director, each of the other current directors, each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table on page 50,54 and all nominees, directors and executive officers as a group.

 

  Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership of Common  Stock       Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
of Common Stock
 

Name of Beneficial Owner

  Sole Voting
Power and/or Sole
Investment Power
   Shared Voting Power
and/or Shared
Investment Power
   Total   Percent
of Class
   Sole Voting
Power and/or  Sole
Investment Power
   Shared Voting  Power
and/or Shared
Investment Power
   Total  Percent
of Class
 

Rex D. Adams

   8,672          8,672(1)         *  

Jerry G. Borrelli

   1,325          1,325             *  

Stephen P. Bradley

   417          417(1)         *     1,696          1,696   (1)   *  

Joseph P. Brandon

   20,160          20,160(2)         *     1,000     23,032     24,032   (2)   *  

Karen Brenner

   2,515          2,515(1)         *     3,961          3,961   (1)   *  

Ian H. Chippendale

   417          417(1)         *     1,696          1,696   (1)   *  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

   1,902          1,902             *     31     4,000     4,031   (3)   *  

John G. Foos

   1,065          1,065(1)         *     1,696     648     2,344   (1)(4)   *  

Roger B. Gorham

   6,732          6,732             *     7,150          7,150      *  

Weston M. Hicks

   60,601          60,601(3)         *     46,751     18,919     65,670   (5)   *  

Thomas S. Johnson

   9,874          9,874(1)         *     10,154          10,154   (1)   *  

Jefferson W. Kirby

   103,445     396,131     499,576(1)(4)     2.97     92,163     396,677     488,840   (1)(6)   3.17  

William K. Lavin

   8,199          8,199(1)         *     6,006          6,006   (1)   *  

Phillip M. Martineau

   2,224          2,224(1)         *     4,070          4,070   (1)   *  

James F. Will

   18,649     1,716     20,365(1)(5)     *  

John L. Sennott, Jr.

        3,150     3,150      *  

Raymond L.M. Wong

   6,915          6,915(1)(6)     *     8,692     1,500     10,192   (1)(7)   *  

All nominees, directors and executive officers as a group (16 persons)

   253,112     397,847     650,959             3.87(7) 

All nominees, directors and executive officers as a group (14 persons)

   185,066     447,926     632,992      4.1(8)  

 

*representsRepresents less than 1.00%1.0%.

 

(1)

Includes 6,0383,654 shares of common stock in the case of Messrs. Johnson, Lavin, and Will, 4,866Mr. Kirby, 3,102 shares of common stock in the case of Mr. Adams, 3,154 shares of common stock in the case of Messrs. Kirby and Wong, 1,0101,510 shares of common stock in the case of Ms. Brenner and Mr. Martineau and 167500 shares of common stock in the case of Messrs. Bradley, Chippendale and Foos, issuable under stock options granted pursuant to the 2015 Directors’ Stock Plan (the “2015 Directors’ Plan”), Amended and Restated 2010 Directors’ Stock Plan or the(the “2010 Directors’ Plan,”Plan”) and the 2005 Directors’ Stock Plan or the

-11-


“2005(the “2005 Directors’ Plan,” and the 2000 Directors’ Stock Option Plan, or the “2000 Directors’ Plan.” In addition, includes 250 shares of restricted common stock or restricted stock units granted to each of Messrs. Adams, Bradley, Chippendale, Foos, Johnson, Kirby, Lavin, Martineau, Will and Wong and Ms. Brenner, pursuant to the 2010 Directors’ Plan, which shares are subject to a one-year vesting period that will end on April 26, 2013.Plan”).

 

(2)Does not include any shares that may be paid pursuant toissued upon the vesting of outstanding restricted stock units held by Mr. Brandon. Includes 23,002 shares of common stock held jointly with Mr. Brandon’s spouse, over which Mr. Brandon shares voting and investment power. Includes 30 shares of common stock held by Mr. Brandon’s children, over which Mr. Brandon shares investment power, and for which he disclaims beneficial ownership.

 

(3)Includes 9,4604,000 shares of common stock held jointly with Mr. Dalrymple’s spouse, over which Mr. Dalrymple shares voting and investment power.

(4)Includes 648 shares of common stock held jointly with Mr. Foos’ spouse, over which Mr. Foos shares voting and investment power.

(5)Includes 18,919 shares of common stock held by a trust of which Mr. Hicks has voting and investment control and 9,459 shares of common stock held by a trust oftrusts over which Mr. Hicks has voting and investment control.

 

-22-


(4)(6)Includes 159,097 shares of common stock held by trusts of which Mr. Kirby is co-trustee and beneficiary;beneficiary and shares voting and investment power as to such shares; 27,586 shares as to which Mr. Kirby is sole trustee and beneficiary;beneficiary and over which Mr. Kirby has sole voting and investment power; and 237,015 shares held by the Estate of Fred M. Kirby II.II Residuary Trust. Mr. Kirby is co-trustee of the Fred M. Kirby II Residuary Trust and shares voting and investment power as to such shares. Also includes 19 shares held by Mr. Kirby’s spouse, over which Mr. Kirby shares voting and investment power, and 728546 shares held by Mr. Kirby’s children, over which Mr. Kirby has soleshares voting and investment power. Mr. Kirby held 71,977 shares directly, of whichpower, and 23 shares were held by a limited liability company with Mr. Kirby exercising sole voting and investment power in respect of such shares.

 

(5)(7)Includes 1,716600 shares of common stock owned by Mr. Wong’s children, over which Mr. Wong shares voting and investment power, and 900 shares of common stock held by a trust of which Mr. Will is co-trustee.Wong shares voting and investment power.

 

(6)Includes 200 shares of common stock owned by Mr. Wong’s children.

(7)(8)Based on the number of shares of outstanding common stock as of March 1, 2013,2016, adjusted in the case of each director to include shares of common stock issuable within 60 days upon exercise of stock options held by such director.

 

-12--23-


Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Alleghany has determined that, except as set forth below, no person who at any time during 20122015 was a director, officer or beneficial owner of more than 10% of common stock failed to file on a timely basis reports required by Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the “Exchange Act,” during 2012.2015. This determination is based solely upon Alleghany’s review of Forms 3, 4 and 5, and written representations that no Form 5 was required, which such persons submitted to Alleghany during or with respect to 2012. Joseph P. Brandon2015. Weston M. Hicks filed a Form 4 on November 9, 2012April 2, 2015 reporting onea transaction that occurred on September 3, 2012. Stephen P. Bradley filed a Form 5 on January 22, 2013 reporting one transaction that occurred on April 30, 2012.2, 2015.

 

-13--24-


PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Stephen P. Bradley, Nominees for Election

Karen Brenner Thomas S. Johnson and James F. WillJohn G. Foos have been nominated by the Board for election as directors at the 20132016 Annual Meeting, each to serve for a term of three years, until the 20162019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until hisher or herhis successor is duly elected and qualified. Each of the nominees is a current member of the Board and was recommended to the Board for nomination for election to the Board by the Nominating and Governance Committee. Messrs.Following the 2016 Annual Meeting, Mr. Bradley and Mr. Johnson, members of the class of 2016, will no longer serve as directors of Alleghany. Mr. Foos was last elected to the Board at the 2015 Annual Meeting held on April 24, 2015, and Will andhas been added by the Board to the class of directors standing for re-election at the 2016 Annual Meeting in order to make the classes of the Board as nearly equal in size as practicable. Ms. Brenner werewas last elected by stockholders at the 20102013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on April 23, 2010. Mr. Bradley was appointed to the Board as a member of the class of 2013 upon the closing of the acquisition of Transatlantic on March 6, 2012, in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement, and is standing for election to the Board for the first time at the 2013 Annual Meeting.26, 2013.

Information about Voting

Proxies received from Alleghany stockholders of record will be voted for the election of the fourtwo nominees named above as Alleghany directors unless such stockholders indicate otherwise. If any of the foregoing nominees is unable to serve for any reason, which is not anticipated, the shares represented by proxy may be voted for such other person or persons as may be determined by the holders of such proxy unless stockholders indicate otherwise. A nominee for director shall be elected to the Board if such nominee receives the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to the election of such nominee. A majority of votes cast means the number of votes cast “for” a nominee’s election must exceed the number of votes cast “against” the nominee’s election. Abstentions and broker non-votes (see “Information About Voting”)page 10) do not count as votes cast “for” or “against” the nominee’s election. Abstentions and broker non-voteselection, but will be counted as present at the meeting for quorum purposes.

Director Qualifications

-14-


The following information includes for each of the age,nominees named for election as director at the 2016 Annual Meeting, and each of the other directors of Alleghany:

age;

year in which first elected as a director of Alleghany, the Alleghany;

principal occupation and/or other business experience for the past five years, years;

other public company directorships during the past five years,years; and the

experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of each of the nominees named for election as director, and of each of the other directors of Alleghany. skills.

In addition to the information presented below regarding the specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led the Board to the conclusion that each of the nominees named for election as director should be elected as a director of Alleghany, Alleghany believes that each of the nominees, and each of the other directors of Alleghany, has a reputation for integrity, honesty and for adherence to high ethical standards. Alleghany also believes that each of the nominees, named for election as director, and each of the other directors of Alleghany, has demonstrated business acumen and an ability to exercise sound judgment, as well as a commitment to service to Alleghany and to the Board.

-25-


Nominees for Election

 

Stephen P. BradleyKaren Brenner

Age 7160

Director since 20122009

MemberChair of the

    Nominating and

    Governance Committee

Term expires in 2013

LOGO

Mr. Bradley is currently the William Ziegler Professor of Business Administration Emeritus at the Harvard Business School where he has been a professor since 1968. In addition, Mr. Bradley currently serves as a director of CRICO/Risk Management Foundation. Mr. Bradley was a director of Transatlantic prior to March 6, 2012 and has also previously served as a director of CIENA Corp. and i2 Technologies, Inc.

Mr. Bradley’s qualifications to serve on the Alleghany Board also include his academic experience at the Harvard Business School relating to his work as a professor of competitive and corporate strategy and his considerable experience as a consultant and as a director of public companies.

-15-


Karen Brenner

Age 57

Director since 2009

Member of the Audit

    Committee

Member of the Nominating and

    Governance Committee

Term expires in 2013

  LOGOLOGO  

Ms. Brenner has been an Executive Director of Law and Business Initiatives at New York University since 2012 and Clinical Professor of Business at the Leonard N. Stern School of Business at New York University since 2008. She teaches professional responsibility in law and business, corporate governance in law and business and corporate transformation and leadership. Ms. Brenner also has been a principal at Brenner & Company, a financial management and advisory firm she founded, since 1998.

 

Ms. Brenner’s qualifications to serve on the Alleghany Board also include her years of business experience as Chairman/Chief Executive Officer and/or board member of public and private companies in a wide variety of industries, and as an advisor to private equity firms, venture capital companies, boards of directors and chief executive officers focusing on enhancing value of operating companies, and her experience in corporate governance and management issues.

Thomas S. Johnson

John G. Foos

Age 7266

Director since 1997

    and for 1992-19932012

Member of the Compensation

Audit     Committee

Member of the

    Nominating and

    Governance Committee

Term expires in 2013

LOGO

  LOGO

Mr. JohnsonFoos was Chairman and Chief Executive
Financial Officer of GreenPoint Financial Corporation and
its subsidiary GreenPoint BankIndependence Blue Cross, a health insurance company, from 19931989 until
his retirement on December 31, 2004.
in November 2008. In addition, Mr. JohnsonFoos currently serves as a director of
R.R. Donnelly & Sons Company Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina, a South Carolina-owned and The
Phoenixoperated health insurance carrier, the HAI Group Companies, Inc.a provider of niche insurance programs and services for the public and affordable housing community, and Emerald Shelter Group, a not-for-profit that provides healthcare and affordable housing. Mr. Foos served as a
director and Chairman of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage
CorporationBoard of Directors of Plan Investment Fund during the past five years.years and was a director of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc. prior to March 6, 2012.

 

Mr. Johnson’sFoos’ qualifications to serve on the
Alleghany Board also include his over
30 yearsextensive experience in and knowledge of accounting and finance, which includes service as the Chief Financial Officer of Independence Blue Cross, in addition to his prior experience as a financial services
industry executive, particularly as Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of GreenPoint
Financial Corporation, his experience as a
director on the boards of directors of other
companies,Partner with KPMG LLP and his financial literacy.

 

-16--26-


James F. Will

Age 74

Director since 1992

Chairman of the

    Compensation Committee

Member of the

    Nominating and

    Governance Committee

Term expires in 2013

LOGO

Mr. Will was the President of Saint Vincent College from July 2000 until his retirement in June 2006, at which time he was named Vice Chancellor and President Emeritus of Saint Vincent College.

Mr. Will’s qualifications to serve on the Alleghany Board also include his over 20 years of experience as an executive in the steel industry, particularly his tenure as President and Chief Executive Officer of Armco Inc., a steel manufacturing and metals processing company, and his experience as President of Saint Vincent College.

Other Alleghany Directors

 

Rex D. AdamsStephen P. Bradley

Age 73

Director since 1999

Chairman of the

    Nominating and

    Governance Committee

Member of the Audit

    Committee

Term expires in 2014

LOGO

Mr. Adams has been a director and Chairman
of the Board of Directors of Invesco Ltd., an
investment management company, since April
2006, and a director of Invesco Ltd. since
2001. In addition, Mr. Adams has been Dean
Emeritus at the Fuqua School of Business at
Duke University since December 2004.

Mr. Adams’ qualifications to serve on the
Alleghany Board also include his business
experience, including over 30 years as an
executive of Mobil Corporation, his
experience as a director on the boards of
directors of other companies, particularly
companies in the investment management
industry, his financial literacy, his experience
as the Dean and as a professor at the Fuqua
School of Business at Duke University, and
his experience in matters of corporate
governance.

-17-


Ian H. Chippendale

Age 6474

Director since 2012

Member of the Audit Committee

Member of the
Nominating and
Governance Committee

Retiring effective at the

    2016 Annual Meeting

LOGO  

Mr. Bradley is currently the William Ziegler Professor of Business Administration Emeritus at the Harvard Business School where he has been a professor since 1968. In addition, Mr. Bradley currently serves as a director of CRICO/Risk Management Foundation, a medical professional liability carrier. Mr. Bradley was a director of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc. prior to March 6, 2012 and also previously served as a director of CIENA Corp. and i2 Technologies, Inc.

Mr. Bradley’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include his academic experience at the Harvard Business School relating to his work as a professor of competitive and corporate strategy and his considerable experience as a consultant and as a director of public companies.

Ian H. Chippendale

Age 67

Director since 2012

Chairman of the
Compensation Committee

Term expires in 20142017

  LOGO

LOGO  

  

Mr. Chippendale is the retired Chairman (from September 2003 to December 2006) of RBS Insurance Group, Ltd., an insurance company. In addition, Mr. Chippendale has served as a director of HomeServe plc, sincean insurance company, from January 2007 through March 2015 and was a director of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc. prior to March 6, 2012.

 

Mr. Chippendale’s qualifications to serve on the Alleghany Board also include his insurance industry knowledge and his international experience, including his service as the Chairman of RBS Insurance Group, Ltd.

Weston M. Hicks

Age 5659

Director since 2004

Term expires in 20142017

  LOGO

LOGO  

  

Mr. Hicks has been Alleghany’s President and
chief executive officer since December 2004.
In addition, Mr. Hicks is a director of
AllianceBernstein Corporation.Corporation, an investment management and research company.

 

Mr. Hicks’Hicks’s qualifications to serve on the
Alleghany Board also include his years of
experience as an executive in the insurance
and financial services industry, particularly his
experience as Alleghany’s President and chief
executive officer during the past eighteleven years,
and his experience as an analyst of property
andpropertyand casualty insurance companies.

-27-


Thomas S. Johnson

Age 75

Director since 1997

    and for 1992-1993

Member of the Compensation     Committee

Member of the

    Nominating and

    Governance Committee

Retiring effective at the

    2016 Annual Meeting

LOGO  

Mr. Johnson was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of GreenPoint Financial Corporation and its subsidiary GreenPoint Bank from 1993 until his retirement on December 31, 2004. Mr. Johnson currently serves as a director of Santander Holdings USA, Inc., a subsidiary of global commercial and retail bank Banco Santander, S.A., and as a director of Santander Bank, N.A., a subsidiary of Santander Holdings USA, Inc. Mr. Johnson previously served as a director of the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation, the Institute of International Education, The Phoenix Companies, Inc., R.R. Donnelly & Sons Company and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.

Mr. Johnson’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include his over 30 years of experience as a financial services industry executive, particularly as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of GreenPoint Financial Corporation, his experience as a member of the boards of directors of other companies and his financial literacy.

Jefferson W. Kirby

Age 5154

Director since 2006

Term expires in 20142017

  LOGO

LOGO  

  

Mr. Kirby has been Chairman of the Board of Alleghany since July 2010. Mr. Kirby has been the Managing Member of Broadfield Capital Management, LLC, an investment advisory services company, since July 2003. Mr. Kirby also currently serves aswas a director of Somerset Hills Bancorp.Bancorp from 2008 until May 2013.

 

Mr. Kirby’s qualifications to serve on the Alleghany Board also include his over 2025 years of experience in financial services and investment management, including his service as a Vice President of Alleghany from 1994 tountil June 2003 and as an investment manager.

 

-18-


John G. Foos

Age 63

Director since 2012

Member of the Audit

    Committee

Term expires in 2015

LOGO

Mr. Foos was Chief Financial Officer of
Independence Blue Cross, a health insurance
company, from 1989 until his retirement in
November 2008. In addition, Mr. Foos currently
serves as a director of Blue Cross Blue Shield of
South Carolina and served as a director and
Chairman of the Board of Plan Investment Fund
during the past five years. Mr. Foos was a
director of Transatlantic prior to March 6, 2012.

Mr. Foos’ qualifications to serve on the
Alleghany Board also include his extensive
experience in and knowledge of accounting and
finance, which includes service as the Chief
Financial Officer of Independence Blue Cross,
in addition to his prior experience as a Partner
with KPMG LLP, and his financial literacy.

William K. Lavin

Age 6871

Director since 1992

Chairman of the Audit

    Committee

Member of the

Compensation

    Committee

Term expires in 20152018

  LOGO

LOGO  

  

Mr. Lavin has been a financial consultant since October 1994, and currently serves as a director of Artisanal Brands, Inc., a specialty foods company.

 

Mr. Lavin’s qualifications to serve on the Alleghany Board also include his business experience as an executive with public and private companies, his extensive experience with public and financial accounting matters for such companies and his financial literacy.

 

-19--28-


Phillip M. Martineau

Age 6568

Director since 2009

Member of the Compensation

    Committee

Member of the

    Nominating and

    Governance Committee

Term expires in 20152018

  LOGOLOGO    

Mr. Martineau has beenwas Chairman, President
and Chief Executive Officer of Pittsburgh
Corning Corporation and Pittsburgh Corning
Europe, building materials companies, since
from June 2005.2005 until his retirement in May 2014. Prior to that, Mr. Martineau was
Chief Executive Officer and a director of High
Voltage Engineering Corporation, (“High
Voltage”),or “High Voltage,” a designer and manufacturer of
power control systems, from December 2004
until February 2005. The Board of Directors of
High Voltage hired Mr. Martineau as Chief
Executive Officer to lead High Voltage
through a restructuring under Chapter 11 of
the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, which resulted in
its sale to Siemens in February 2005.

 

Mr. Martineau’s qualifications to serve on the
Alleghany Board also include his years of
executive operational experience with global
companies in the materials and manufacturing
sectors, particularly his experience as a Chief
Executive Officer of such companies, as well
as his experience as a directorserving on the boards of
directors of other companies.

Raymond L.M. Wong

Age 6063

Director since 2006

Member of the Audit

Committee

Member of the

Compensation

Committee

Term expires in 20152018

  LOGO

LOGO  

  

Mr. Wong is currently a Managing Director of Spring Mountain Capital, LP, an investment management company which he joined in 2007. Prior to that, from 2002 until 2007, Mr. Wong was the Managing Member of DeFee Lee Pond Capital LLC, a financial advisory and private investment company. In addition, Mr. Wong is a director of American Power Group Corporation, an energy technology company, Oncoceutics Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, and Hurel Corporation, a bioanalytic tools company.

 

Mr. Wong’s qualifications to serve on the Alleghany Board also include his business experience, particularly his 25 years as a managing director in the investment banking group of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., and his financial literacy.

 

-20--29-


Compensation of Directors

The information under this heading relates to the compensation during 20122015 of those non-employee directors who served on the Board at any time during 2012.2015. Employee directors are not separately compensated for their service on the Board.

20122015 Director Compensation

 

Name

  Fees
Earned
or Paid
in Cash
   Stock
Awards
(1)
   Option
Awards
(2)
   All Other
Compensation(3)
   Total   Fees
Earned or  Paid
in Cash
   Stock
Awards(1)
   Total 

Rex D. Adams(2)

  $67,000    $85,463    $69,950         $222,413    $13,500         $13,500  

Stephen P. Bradley

  $56,287    $85,463    $69,950         $211,700     107,000    $140,000     247,000  

Karen Brenner

  $62,000    $85,463    $69,950         $217,413     109,500     140,000     249,500  

John J. Burns, Jr.(4)

  $66,667              $39,863    $106,530  

Dan R. Carmichael(5)

  $15,000                   $15,000  

Ian H. Chippendale

  $57,787    $85,463    $69,950         $213,200     100,000     140,000     240,000  

John G. Foos

  $60,287    $85,463    $69,950         $215,700     107,000     140,000     247,000  

Thomas S. Johnson

  $57,000    $85,463    $69,950         $212,413     102,000     140,000     242,000  

Jefferson W. Kirby

  $140,000    $85,463    $69,950         $295,413     145,000     140,000     285,000  

William K. Lavin

  $80,000    $85,463    $69,950         $235,413     125,000     140,000     265,000  

Phillip M. Martineau

  $57,000    $85,463    $69,950         $212,413     102,000     140,000     242,000  

James F. Will

  $59,500    $85,463    $69,950         $214,913  

Raymond L.M. Wong

  $65,000    $85,463    $69,950         $220,413     110,000     140,000     250,000  

 

(1)Represents the grant date fair value of the award of 250289 shares of restricted common stock or 250289 restricted stock units (each equivalent to one share of common stock) made to each non-employee director under the 20102015 Directors’ Plan on April 30, 2012,27, 2015, and computed in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (the “ASC”) Topic 718 (“ASC 718”). Pursuant to the 2015 Directors’ Plan, the number of shares or “ASC 718.”restricted stock units are calculated by dividing the number of shares or restricted stock units equal to $140,000 (as determined by the Board in accordance with the 2015 Directors’ Plan) by the average of the closing sales prices of the common stock on the 30 consecutive trading days preceding the grant date as reported by the NYSE. As of December 31, 2012,2015, each director held either 250289 shares of unvested restricted common stock or 250289 unvested restricted stock units.

 

(2)Represents the grant date fair value dollar amount of a stock option for 500 shares of common stock made to each non-employee director under the 2010 Directors’ Plan on April 30, 2012, and computed in accordance with ASC 718. The number of outstanding stock options held at December 31, 2012 by each director or former director was as follows: 6,538 for each of Messrs. Johnson, Lavin and Will; 5,366 for Mr. Adams; 3,654 for each of Messrs. Kirby and Wong; 1,510 for each of Ms. Brenner and Mr. Martineau; 541 for Mr. Burns; and 500 for each of Messrs. Bradley, Chippendale and Foos.

-21-


(3)Reflects a payment of $23,597, representing the dollar value of the insurance premiums paid by Alleghany for the benefit of Mr. Burns for life insurance maintained on his behalf pursuant to Alleghany’s life insurance program in which retired Alleghany officers are eligible to participate, and a payment of $16,266, representing the reimbursement of taxes, and the reimbursement itself, on income imputed to Mr. Burns pursuant to such life insurance program.

(4)Mr. Burns was not nominated for re-election as a director at the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and did not receive any award of restricted stock, restricted stock units or stock options during 2012.

(5)Mr. CarmichaelAdams retired as a director in April 20122015 and did not receive any awards of restricted stock or restricted stock units or stock options during 2012.2015.

Fees Earned or Paid in Cash

In addition to theFollowing is information regarding fees earned and paid in cash to directors for their service on committees, as described below, each director who is not an Alleghany officer or serving as Chairman of the Board receives an annual retainer of $40,000, payable in cash. The Chairman of the Board receives an annual retainer of $140,000. The Chairman of the Audit Committee receives an annual fee of $30,000, and each other member receives an annual fee of $15,000. The Chairman of the Compensation Committee receives an annual fee of $15,000, and each other member receives an annual fee of $10,000. The Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee receives an annual fee of $12,000, and eachits Committees:

  Board

•  Each independent director other than the Chairman receives an annual retainer of $85,000.

•  The Chairman receives an annual retainer of $150,000.

  Audit Committee

•  The Chairman receives an annual fee of $30,000.

•  Each other member receives an annual fee of $15,000.

  Compensation Committee

•  The Chairman receives an annual fee of $15,000.

•  Each other member receives an annual fee of $10,000.

  Nominating and Governance   Committee

•  The Chairman receives an annual fee of $12,000.

•  Each other member receives an annual fee of $7,000.

-30-


Stock Awards and Option Awards

Pursuant to the 20102015 Directors’ Plan, each year as of the first business day following the Annual Meetingan annual meeting of Stockholders,stockholders, each individual who was elected, re-elected or continues to serve as a member of the Board and who is not an employee of Alleghany or any of its subsidiaries receives:

a stock option to purchase 500 shares of common stock, subject to anti-dilution adjustments, at an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant; and

receives, at the individual director’s election, either (i) 250a number of shares of restricted common stock or (ii) 250 restricted stock units each(each equivalent to one share of common stock) equal to $140,000 (as determined by the Board in accordance with the 2015 Directors’ Plan) divided by the average of the closing sales prices of the common stock whichon the 30 consecutive trading days preceding the grant date as reported by the NYSE. Such shares of restricted common stock or restricted stock units, as the case may be, are subject to potential forfeiture until the first Annual Meetingannual meeting of Stockholdersstockholders following the date of grant and are subject to restrictions upon transfer until the third anniversary of the date of grant.

-22-


On April 30, 2012,27, 2015, each eligible director received a stock option to purchase 500 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $341.85 per share and either (i) 250289 shares of restricted common stock or (ii) 250289 restricted stock units.units, reflecting such number of shares or restricted stock units equal to $140,000 (as determined by the Board in accordance with the 2015 Directors’ Plan) divided by the average of the closing sales prices of the common stock on the 30 consecutive trading days preceding the grant date as reported by the NYSE. Each director is permitted to defer payment of the restricted stock units, and all whole restricted stock units will be paid in the form of whole shares of common stock.

Arrangements with the Former Vice Chairman of the Board

Mr. Burns was Chairman of the Board from January 2, 2007 through June 30, 2010 and Vice Chairman of the Board from July 1, 2010 through April 27, 2012. For his service as Vice Chairman of the Board, Mr. Burns received an annual retainer of $200,000 in cash. Mr. Burns previously received an annual retainer of $400,000 in cash for his service as Chairman of the Board. Commencing in 2011, Mr. Burns waived his rights to receive awards under the 2010 Directors’ Plan and any successor plans thereto. In 2004, Alleghany established an office in New Canaan, Connecticut which Mr. Burns used as his principal office for purposes of attending to Alleghany-related matters. As Mr. Burns also used this office to attend to personal matters, since July 1, 2010, Mr. Burns reimbursed Alleghany for fifty percent of the annual rent and operating costs for this office, amounting to $15,256 for calendar year 2012 through June 30, 2012. Mr. Burns assumed the lease for this office and all associated costs on July 1, 2012. During the period that Mr. Burns served as Chairman of the Board, he reimbursed Alleghany for twenty-five percent of the annual rent and operating costs for this office.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE NOMINEES TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS SET FORTH IN THIS PROPOSAL. PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE SO VOTED UNLESS STOCKHOLDERS SPECIFY A CONTRARY VOTE. EACH NOMINEE SHALL BE ELECTED BY THE AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF A MAJORITY OF THE VOTES CAST WITH RESPECT TO THE ELECTION OF SUCH NOMINEE. A MAJORITY OF VOTES CAST MEANS THE NUMBER OF VOTES CAST “FOR” A NOMINEE’S ELECTION MUST EXCEED THE NUMBER OF VOTES CAST “AGAINST” THE NOMINEE’S ELECTION. ABSTENTIONS AND BROKER NON-VOTES (SEE “INFORMATION ABOUT VOTING”) DO NOT COUNT AS VOTES CAST “FOR” OR “AGAINST”WILL HAVE NO EFFECT ON THE NOMINEE’S ELECTION.RESULTS OF THIS VOTE.

 

-23--31-


PROPOSAL 2. RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL 20132016

The Audit Committee has selected Ernst & Young LLP, (“E&Y”)or “E&Y,” as Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2013.2016. Although ratification by stockholders is not a prerequisite to the ability of the Audit Committee to select E&Y as Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee and the Board believe that such ratification is desirable. If stockholders do not ratify the selection of E&Y, the Audit Committee will reconsider its selection of an independent registered public accounting firm.E&Y. The Audit Committee may, however, select E&Y notwithstanding the failure of stockholders to ratify its selection. Alleghany expects that representatives of E&Y will be present at the 20132016 Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Change in Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

On February 13, 2012, following a competitive process undertaken by the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee approved the selection of E&Y to serve as Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012.

Prior to the engagement of E&Y, KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) had been Alleghany’s independent auditors. KPMG was notified on February 13, 2012 that it would not be retained as Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012. KPMG’s engagement as Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm to audit Alleghany’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, was unaffected by the selection of E&Y, as KPMG’s dismissal became effective on February 24, 2012, following the completion of KPMG’s audit of Alleghany’s consolidated financial statements as of2015 and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 and the filing of the related Annual Report on Form 10-K.

During the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the subsequent interim period through the filing of Alleghany’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 on February 24, 2012, there were (i) no disagreements between Alleghany and KPMG on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures, which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of KPMG, would have caused KPMG to make reference thereto in their reports on the consolidated financial statements for such years, and (ii) no “reportable events” as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

-24-


During the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the subsequent interim period through February 24, 2012, Alleghany did not consult with E&Y regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on Alleghany’s consolidated financial statements, and neither a written report was provided to Alleghany nor oral advice was provided that E&Y concluded was an important factor considered by Alleghany in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a “disagreement,” as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions to Item 304 of Regulation S-K, or a “reportable event,” as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

Alleghany provided KPMG with a copy of a Form 8-K/A disclosing the above matters, which was filed on February 28, 2012. KPMG furnished Alleghany with a letter addressed to the SEC stating that KPMG agreed with the statements made in the Form 8-K/A, except that KPMG was not in a position to agree or disagree with Alleghany’s statement that E&Y’s engagement was approved by the Audit Committee or with Alleghany’s statement that E&Y was not engaged regarding the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on Alleghany’s consolidated financial statements, or the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. A copy of such letter, dated February 28, 2012, was filed as Exhibit 16 to the Form 8-K/A.

2012 and 20112014 Fees

The following table summarizes the fees (i)billed for professional audit services rendered by E&Y for the audit of Alleghany’s 2012 annual consolidated financial statements for 2015 and (ii) E&Y incurred2014 and fees for other services rendered to Alleghanyby E&Y for 2012. In addition, the table summarizes the fees (i) for professional audit services rendered by KPMG for the audit of Alleghany’s 2011 annual consolidated financial statements2015 and (ii) KPMG incurred for other services rendered to Alleghany for 2011:2014.

 

   2012   2011 
   E&Y   KPMG 

Audit Fees

  $3,170,000    $2,369,470  

Audit-Related Fees

   150,000     166,000  

Tax Fees

   289,278       

All Other Fees

          
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $3,609,278    $2,535,470  

-25-


   2015   2014 

Audit Fees

  $4,410,000    $3,809,500  

Audit-Related Fees

   49,000     167,000  

Tax Fees

        122,345  

All Other Fees

          
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $4,459,000    $4,098,845  

The amounts shown for “Audit Fees” represent the aggregate fees for professional services E&Y and KPMG rendered for the audit of Alleghany’s annual consolidated financial statements for each of the last two fiscal years, the reviews of Alleghany’s financial statements included in its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and the services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings during each of the last two fiscal years. “Audit Fees” also include fees for professional services E&Y and KPMG rendered for the audit of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. The amounts shown for “Audit-Related Fees” represent the fees E&Y and KPMG incurred forbilled in each of the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of Alleghany’s financial statements and that are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services include due diligence assistance in connection with acquisitions, consents and procedures for registration statements consultations on accounting and audit matters, and review of certain subsidiary material contracts.responses to regulatory requests. The amounts shown for “Tax Fees” are for E&Y represent fees E&Y incurredservices performed in conjunction with a foreign tax inspection for 2012 with respect to tax compliance work for Transatlantic. E&Y was engaged to perform such tax compliance work prior to Alleghany’s acquisition of Transatlantic.years 2011 and prior.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Audit and permissible non-audit services that Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm may provide to Alleghany must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee or, between meetings of the Audit Committee, by its Chairman pursuant to authority delegated to him by the Audit Committee. The Chairman reports all pre-approval decisions made by him at the next meeting of the Audit Committee, and he has undertaken to confer with the Audit Committee to the extent that any engagement for which his pre-approval is sought is expected to generate fees for the independent registered public accounting firm in excess of $100,000. When considering the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee considers, among other matters, whether the provision of non-audit services by the independent registered public accounting firm to Alleghany is compatible with maintaining the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm. All audit and permissible non-audit services rendered in 20122015 and 20112014 were pre-approved pursuant to these procedures.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THIS PROPOSAL. PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE SO VOTED UNLESS STOCKHOLDERS SPECIFY A CONTRARY VOTE. THIS PROPOSAL SHALL BE ADOPTEDAPPROVED BY THE AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF A MAJORITY OF THE VOTES CAST ON THIS PROPOSAL. ABSTENTIONS AND BROKER NON-VOTES WILL HAVE NO EFFECT ON THE RESULTS OF THIS VOTE.

 

-26--32-


Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee is currently composed of the five independent directors whose names appear at the end of this report. Management is responsible for Alleghany’s internal controls and the financial reporting process. Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of Alleghany’s annual consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and for issuing a report thereon. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and review these processes and the activities of Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee members are not acting as professional accountants or auditors, and their responsibilities are not intended to duplicate or certify the activities of management and the independent registered public accounting firm or to certify the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm under applicable rules.

For fiscal 2012,2015, Ernst & Young LLP acted as Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm. In this context, the Audit Committee has met to review and discuss Alleghany’s audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 20122015 and for the fiscal year then ended, including Alleghany’s specific disclosure under management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations and critical accounting estimates, with management and Ernst & Young LLP, Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm.LLP. The Audit Committee has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing StandardsStandard No. 61, as amended, as adopted16, “Communications with Audit Committees,” issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, in Rule 3200T.or the “PCAOB.” Ernst & Young LLP reported to the Audit Committee regarding the critical accounting estimates and practices and the estimates and assumptions used by management in the preparation of the audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 20122015 and for the fiscal year then ended, all alternative treatments of financial information within generally accepted accounting principles that have been discussed with management, the ramifications of use of such alternative treatments and the treatment preferred by Ernst & Young LLP.

Ernst & Young LLP provided a report to the Audit Committee describing Ernst & Young LLP’s internal quality-control procedures and related matters. Ernst & Young LLP also provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight BoardPCAOB regarding Ernst & Young LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its independence. When considering Ernst Young LLP’s independence, the Audit Committee considered, among other matters, whether Ernst & Young LLP’s provision of non-audit services to Alleghany is compatible with

-27-


maintaining the independence of Ernst & Young LLP. All audit and permissible non-audit services in 20122015 and 20112014 were pre-approved pursuant to these procedures.

Based on the reviews and discussions with management and Ernst & Young LLP referred to above, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 20122015 and for the fiscal year then ended be included in Alleghany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for such fiscal year.

William K. Lavin

Rex D. AdamsStephen P. Bradley

Karen Brenner

John G. Foos

Raymond L.M. Wong

Audit Committee

of the Board of Directors

 

-28--33-


PROPOSAL 3. ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE OFFICERSCOMPENSATION

In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are providing stockholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on the 2015 compensation we paid to the executive officers who are named in the Summary Compensation Table on page 54, also referred to as our “Named Executive Officers.” For 2015, Weston M. Hicks, Joseph P. Brandon, Christopher K. Dalrymple, Roger B. Gorham and John L. Sennott, Jr. were our Named Executive Officers.

Please read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 37 of this Proxy Statement as well as the Summary Compensation Table and other related compensation tables, notes and narrative appearing on pages 54 through 69 of this proxy statement, which provide detailed information on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers for 2015.

For a discussion of the results of past advisory votes on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers and the Compensation Committee’s response to such results, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Committee Process — Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation” on page 44.

The name, age, current position, date electedCompensation Committee and prior business experiencethe Board believe that Alleghany’s 2015 executive compensation program was designed appropriately and ensured that management’s interests were aligned with the interests of eachAlleghany stockholders. Accordingly, we are asking our stockholders to vote in favor of the following advisory resolution at the 2016 Annual Meeting:

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of Alleghany Corporation (“Alleghany”) approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of Alleghany’s named executive officers (the “Named Executive Officers”)as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table, and the related compensation tables, notes and narrative set forth in the proxy statement for Alleghany’s 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Although this advisory vote, commonly referred to as “say-on-pay,” is as follows:not binding on Alleghany, the Compensation Committee or the Board, the Board and the Compensation Committee will review and consider the voting results when making future decisions about our executive compensation program.

NameTHE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THIS PROPOSAL. PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE SO VOTED UNLESS STOCKHOLDERS SPECIFY A CONTRARY VOTE. THIS PROPOSAL SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF A MAJORITY OF THE VOTES CAST ON THIS PROPOSAL. ABSTENTIONS AND BROKER NON-VOTES WILL HAVE NO EFFECT ON THE RESULTS OF THIS VOTE.

Age

Current Position (date elected)

Prior Business Experience

Weston M. Hicks56President, chief executive officer (since December 2004)Executive Vice President, Alleghany (October 2002 to December 2004).
Joseph P. Brandon54Executive Vice President (since March 2012)Consultant to Alleghany (September 2011 to March 2012); private investor (May 2008 to August 2011); Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, General Re Corporation, a property and casualty reinsurer and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (September 2001 to April 2008).
Christopher K. Dalrymple45Senior Vice President (since January 2012) — General Counsel (since July 2009) and Secretary (since January 2011)Vice President, Alleghany (December 2004 to January 2012) — Associate General Counsel, Alleghany (March 2002 to July 2009) and Assistant Secretary, Alleghany (March 2002 to January 2011).

 

-29-


Name

Age

Current Position (date elected)

Prior Business Experience

Roger B. Gorham50Senior Vice President — Finance and Investments and acting chief financial officer (since January 2006)(1)Senior Vice President — Finance and chief financial officer, Alleghany (May 2005 to January 2006); Senior Vice President — Finance, Alleghany (December 2004 to May 2005).
Jerry G. Borrelli47Vice President — Finance and chief accounting officer (since July 2006)Vice President — Finance, Alleghany (February 2006 to July 2006).

(1)On January 18, 2013, Alleghany determined to expand its executive leadership team by separating the role of chief financial officer from management of Alleghany’s fixed income portfolio. Accordingly, Mr. Gorham will assume overall responsibility for Alleghany’s fixed income portfolio. Mr. Gorham will serve as Alleghany’s Senior Vice President and chief financial officer until a successor is identified, at which time Mr. Gorham will be named as Senior Vice President — Head of Fixed Income and Treasurer.

-30--34-


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has met to review and discuss with Alleghany’s management the specific disclosure contained under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis and Compensation Matters” appearingAnalysis” beginning on pages 32 through 71 below.page 37. Based on its review and discussions with management regarding such disclosure, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and Compensation Matters be included in this proxy statementProxy Statement and incorporated by reference in Alleghany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

James F. Will2015.

Ian H. Chippendale

Thomas S. Johnson

William K. Lavin

Phillip M. Martineau

Raymond L.M. Wong

Compensation Committee

of the Board of Directors

 

-31--35-


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

37

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

37

2015 Compensation Program Summary

39

Alleghany Performance in 2015

40

Alleghany Long-Term Performance

41

Compensation Committee Process

43

Compensation Determination Timetable

43

Compensation Committee Advisors and Services

43

Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

44

Elements of 2015 Compensation

45

Salary

45

Annual Cash Incentive Compensation

46

Long-Term Equity-Based Incentive Compensation

50

Performance Shares

50

Restricted Stock Units

51

Perquisites

51

Deferred Compensation Plan

51

Retirement Plan

52

Financial Statement Restatements

52

Hedging and Pledging Policies

52

Executive Officer Stock Ownership Guidelines

52

Tax Considerations

52

Compensation Policies and Practices Relating to Risk Management

53

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

54

Summary Compensation Table

54

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2015

57

Narrative Discussion Relating to the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

58

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2015 Fiscal Year-End

62

2015 Stock Vested

63

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

63

Pension Benefits

65

Payments Upon Termination of Employment

67

-36-


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

AND COMPENSATION MATTERS

Compensation PhilosophyandPhilosophy and Objectives

Our corporatefinancial objective in the current economic environment is to create stockholder value through the ownership and management of a small group of operating subsidiaries and investments. The intent ofgrow our executive compensation program is to provide competitive total compensation to our Named Executive Officers (as defined on page 29) in a manner that links their interests with the interests of our stockholders in creating and preserving stockholder value. In addition, our compensation program is intended to support our strategic objective of increasing common stockholders’ equity per share at rates of 7-10% over the long term without employing excessive amounts of financial leverage and without taking imprudent risks. This approach enables us to manage risk to avoid loss of capital during periods of economic turmoil, which we believe creates maximum value for stockholders in the long run even if it results in lower levels of capital appreciation during periods when economic conditions are more favorable.

The foundation ofThrough our executive compensation program, restswe intend to provide compensation to our Named Executive Officers that is aligned with our corporate financial objective. Our compensation program is meant to provide reasonable amounts of compensation, weighted towards long-term incentive awards primarily based on performance that are capped with a reasonable upside to discourage imprudent risk taking or misaligned incentives.

For 2015, this compensation philosophy was evidenced by the following principlescompensation highlights:

CEO total direct compensation (salary, annual incentive and long-term equity based awards) was $6.7 million, representing less than 0.9% of 2015 pre-tax earnings and approximately 0.1% of 2015 revenues, and total direct compensation for our Named Executive Officers as a group was $17.1 million, representing approximately 2.4% of 2015 pre-tax earnings and approximately 0.4% of 2015 revenues.

85% of Mr. Hicks’s total direct compensation for 2015 was linked to performance, while performance-linked compensation for our other Named Executive Officers averaged 74% of total direct compensation in 2015.

Mr. Hicks’s 2015 total direct compensation decreased by 10% from 2014 total direct compensation, due to a lower annual incentive payout for 2015.

Annual incentive plan awards included a financial objective but also discretion given the nature of Alleghany’s business and long-term approach, with the discretionary aspect being restricted by the fact that payouts for 2015 were limited to the lesser of (i) approximately $5.7 million (representing the maximum potential payout for our Named Executive Officers as a group) or (ii) 3% of 2015 annual adjusted pre-tax earnings, if less than $5.7 million.

Long-term performance share awards were subject to goals that we believebelieved would be challenging to meet in today’s low interest rate and volatile market environment and that are aligned with our corporate financial objective of long-term growth in book value, with no payout being made if threshold performance is not achieved, and with our CEO’s long-term incentives based 100% on performance.

Further, over the past three years, the Compensation Committee and the Board have taken the following actions, among others, to improve our executive compensation program and further align our compensation programit with the interests of our stockholders:

 

Afreezing the Retirement Plan due to its retention benefits being outweighed by its significant portionbenefit obligations and lack of a pay-for-performance element;

eliminating the Executive Post-Retirement Medical Plan (which provided post-retirement health insurance reimbursement benefits) for cost-control purposes and lack of a pay-for-performance element;

increasing the book value growth performance thresholds (described on page 51) and eliminating an adjustment for performance relative to the S&P 500 Index for long-term incentive awards;

adjusting Mr. Hicks’s compensation mix to be more tied to performance-based components, particularly long-term, performance-based equity awards, while keeping his total direct compensation substantially flat during this period; and

re-establishing the concept of “target” and “maximum” opportunities for annual incentive awards.

-37-


Finally, we believe the following practices further align our compensation program with our stockholders’ interests:

What We Do

Our Incentive Awards are “Capped”

•  Individual awards under our short and long-term incentive plans are “capped” at 150% of target and performance goals are set at realistic levels to eliminate the potential for unintended windfalls and to avoid encouraging the use of excessive financial leverage or taking of imprudent risks.

Robust Stock Ownership Guidelines

•  We require our officers to own a substantial amount of our common stock, including five times base salary for Mr. Hicks, to ensure that they maintain a significant stake in our long-term success. In addition, our Named Executive Officers have significant exposure to Alleghany through unvested performance shares and, for

some of our Named Executive Officers, shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units, the value of which is tied to the market price of our common stock.

We can “Claw Back” Compensation

•  We have in place a compensation clawback policy applicable to our Named Executive Officers to further discourage imprudent risk taking.

We Limit Perquisites to Insignificant Amounts

•  Our general practice is to not provide perquisites or other personal benefits to our Named Executive Officers. In 2015, no Named Executive Officer received more than $10,000 in perquisites or other personal benefits.

Independent Compensation Consultant

•  The Compensation Committee retains an independent compensation consulting firm which provides no other services to Alleghany.

What We Don’t Do

No Stock Options

•  We do not grant stock options.

No Accelerated Vesting of Performance
Shares upon Termination or a Change-in-Control

•  Performance share and restricted stock awards under long-term incentive plans do not provide for accelerated vesting in the event of a termination of employment by Alleghany, other than on a pro-rated basis for performance shares based on Alleghany performance through date of termination in the event of a termination without cause.

•  Awards under our short and long-term incentive plans do not provide for accelerated vesting upon a change-in-control.

No Hedging or Pledging of Stock

•  We have in place a policy applicable to our Named Executive Officers that prohibits them from hedging or pledging Alleghany securities they hold.

-38-


2015 Compensation Program Summary

2015 total direct compensation (salary, annual incentive compensation, long-term incentive compensation and savings benefit) is tied to our financial performance. In 2012, approximately 75% of Mr. Hicks’ direct compensation, and at least 50% of the direct compensation for each of our other Named Executive Officers, depended upon our financial performance.

Individual awards under our short and long-term incentive plans are “capped” and performance goals are set at realistic levels to eliminate the potential for unintended windfalls and to avoid encouraging the use of excessive financial leverage and taking of imprudent risks.

Awards under our short and long-term incentive plans do not provide for accelerated vesting upon a change-in-control.

Awards under our long-term incentive plan do not provide for accelerated vesting in the event of a termination of employment by Alleghany, other than on a pro-rated basis for time employed during the performance period.

-32-


We require our officers to own a substantial amount of our common stock, including five times base salary for Mr. Hicks, to ensure that they maintain a significant stake in our long-term success. In addition, our Named Executive Officers have significant exposure to Alleghany through unvested performance shares, the value of which depends upon the market price of our common stock.

We do not grant stock options to our officers. Our goal is to promote risk-adjusted long-term growth in the intrinsic value of our common stock and we do not wish to reward or punish our officers for exogenous short-term market price movements. We believe that over time intrinsic value will be reflected in the market price of our common stock.

We have in place a compensation clawback policy applicable to our Named Executive Officers to further discourage imprudent risk taking.

Our general practice is to not provide perquisites or other personal benefits to our Named Executive Officers. In 2012, no Named Executive Officer received more than $10,000 in perquisites or other personal benefits.

Components of our 2012 Compensation Program

The primary components of our 2012 compensation programequity based awards) for our Named Executive Officers are summarized below.

 

Annual
Compensation
Component

Key Features/Purpose  

Key FeaturesAmounts

PurposeInvolved

Salary  Fixed annual cash amount.

Provides a fixed amount of cash compensation upon which our Named Executive Officers can rely.compensation.

The Compensation Committee generally makes salary adjustments annually, based on salaries for the prior year, general inflation, individual performance and internal comparability considerations.

LOGO

Annual Cash Incentives

  

The Compensation Committee establishes target annual incentiveProvides a pay-for-performance component for achievement of shorter-term objectives, with individual awards as a percentage“capped” at 150% of base salary for each Named Executive Officer.target.

 

The Compensation Committee determines individual results for participants and payouts based on for more senior Named Executive Officers, overall financial and operational performance of management and, for less senior Named Executive Officers, individual performance.management.

  Provides pay-for-performance component for achievement of shorter-term objectives.

-33-


Annual Compensation
Component

Key Features

Purpose

LOGO
Long-Term Equity-Based Incentives  Grant of number of performance shares having a value at the date of grant equal to a percentage of base salary, which percentage is individually determined by the Compensation Committee for each Named Executive Officer.

Performance shares granted for the award period beginning on January 1, 2012 will be paid out on the basis of performance over the four-year award period ending December 31, 2015 based on the average annual compound growth in Alleghany’s book value per share, subject to adjustment for performance relative to the S&P 500 Index over the same period.

Shares: Provides pay-for-performance component focused on achievement of longer-term financial objective of increasing book value per share at rates of7-10% over the long term without employing excessive amounts of financial leverage and without taking imprudent risks.
Retirement BenefitCompletion Individual performance share awards are “capped” at 150% of five yearstarget.

Awards made in February 2015 pay out to participants based on the average annual compound growth in our book value per share from the award date through year-end 2018, with growth at 7% paying out at target, growth at 9% paying out at maximum and growth below 5% paying zero.

Restricted Stock Units:Grants of service is requiredrestricted stock units to receive any retirement benefitour chief financial officer and payout of the full retirement benefit requires 15 years of service. Prior to January 1, 2011, the benefit payable under the retirement plan was based upon a formula that considered both annual base salary and annual cash incentives. Effective January 1, 2011, annual cash incentives earned for years subsequent to 2010 are not considered in the computation of the retirement benefit. Long-term incentives are not taken into account in computing retirement benefits.

ProvidesGeneral Counsel provide a retention element of total compensation. In addition, because Alleghany’s senior executives are typically recruited mid-career, assistscompensation and incent the prudence we desire them to have in attracting senior-level talent.their respective roles.

The value of such awards depends on the market price of our common stock. The awards cliff-vest four years from date of grant.

LOGO

Savings Benefit under Deferred Compensation Plan  Total 2015 NEO Salary, Annual credit of an amount equal to 15% of base salary.Provides a stable component of total compensation.Incentive and LTIP Award Amount = $17.1 million

 

-34--39-


In addition to the salary, annual cash incentives and long-term equity-based incentives described above, our Named Executive Officers receive an annual savings benefit under Alleghany’s deferred compensation plan, or the “Deferred Compensation Plan,” in an amount equal to 15% of base salary. Our Named Executive Officers who have completed five years of service with Alleghany or a subsidiary of Alleghany are eligible to receive a benefit under a retirement plan. Effective December 31, 2013, the retirement plan was closed to new participants, and no additional benefits for existing participants have accrued after such date.

Alleghany Performance in 20122015

2012 was a transformational year for Alleghany due to the acquisition of Transatlantic on March 6, 2012. The acquisition resulted in Alleghany’s entry into the global reinsurance business, a more than doubling of Alleghany’s market capitalization and almost four-fold

4.4% increase in net invested assets, and a greatly expanded stockholder base. In addition, the acquisition provided our stockholders with a number of strategic and financial benefits, including a more diversified spread of risk, both in terms of type of exposure and geography, and it was immediately highly accretive to our earnings and common stockholders’ equity per share. The impact of the Transatlantic acquisition was reflected in our year-end 2012 results. Despite losses at Transatlantic and RSUI Group, Inc., or “RSUI,” from Super Storm Sandy, our common stockholders’ equity per share to $486.02 at 2015 year-end 2012 was $379.13, an increasefrom $465.51 at 2014 year-end, summarized in more detail in the following table (dollars in millions):

   TransRe  RSUI  Other(1)  Total 

Beginning equity

  $5,130   $1,587   $756   $7,473  

Operating income

   408    148    (48  508  

Net realized gains, after tax

   94    54    (9  139  

Impairment losses, after tax

   (46  (15  (26  (87
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net earnings

   456    187    (83  560  

Other changes(2)

   (126  (58  (50  (234

Capital transactions

   (250  (150  156    (244
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Ending equity

   5,210    1,566    779    7,555  

Operating Return on Equity

   7.9  9.3  (6.3)%   6.8

Growth in book value(3)

   6.4  8.1  (18.4)%   4.3

Growth in book value per share

      4.4

(1)CapSpecialty, Inc., or “CapSpecialty,” Pacific Compensation Corporation, or “PacificComp,” corporate assets, and Alleghany Capital Corporation, or “Alleghany Capital,” investments, net of holding company debt.

(2)Principally the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, net of tax.

(3)Dividends and share repurchases added back to ending equity.

Net earnings of 10.8% from common$560.3 million in 2015, compared with $679.2 million in 2014, primarily reflecting higher other-than-temporary impairment losses in 2015 compared with 2014.

Consolidated Alleghany underwriting profit of $466.6 million in 2015, compared with $494.8 million in 2014, and a consolidated combined ratio of 89.0% in 2015, compared with 88.8% in 2014, reflecting continued positive underwriting results at TransRe and RSUI.

TransRe and RSUI, which together account for 90% of our consolidated stockholders’ equity, per shareproduced high single-digit returns on equity on an operating basis (excluding net realized capital gains or losses and other-than-temporary impairment charges). Investment returns, however, were weak in 2015 resulting in slightly lower growth in book value for each company relative to the return on equity, which is consistent with the lackluster performance of $342.12 at year-end 2011.

Additional information regarding Alleghany’s 2012 results, including audited consolidated financial statements, as well as management’s discussion and analysis with respect to 2012 results, is containedall investment classes generally in Alleghany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K2015.

The results for the year ended December 31, 2012, which was filed with“Other” column primarily reflect: (1) the SEC on February 21, 2013. Readers are urged to review such Form 10-Krelative underperformance of CapSpecialty and PacificComp (although each company improved significantly in 2015); (2) operating losses at Stranded Oil Resources Corporation; and (3) investments held for a more complete discussiontheir total return (mostly equities) where dividend income is less than the cost of Alleghany’s financial performance.holding company debt.

Alleghany made progress in building Alleghany Capital’s portfolio of non-financial business investments by acquiring IPS.

 

-35--40-


Alleghany Long-Term Performance

We believe that Alleghany’s performance is best measured over the long-term.long term, and that long-term growth in common stockholders’ equity per share is the best metric for evaluating such performance. In this regard, the table below shows the annual, and three- and ten-year average rolling, annualized growth in our common stockholders’ equity per share during the five-year period from December 31, 2010 to December 31, 2015:

   Common
Stockholders’

Equity
Per Share($)(1)
   Annual
Growth
       
      Rolling Annualized Average 

Year

     Three-Year  Ten-Year 

2010

   325.31     10.4    5.0    8.7  

2011

   342.12     5.2    8.6    7.7  

2012

   379.13     10.8    8.7    8.8  

2013

   412.96     8.9    8.3    8.5  

2014

   465.51     12.7    10.8    8.6  

2015

   486.02     4.4    8.6    8.6  

Average

     8.7  8.3  8.5

(1)Adjusted for subsequent stock dividends

As can be seen in the table above, Alleghany’s common stockholders’ equity per share has compounded over the various time metrics in the mid-range of Alleghany’s stated financial objective of 7-10% annual growth in common stockholders’ equity per share.

The chart below summarizes Alleghany’s common stockholders’ equity per share growth and stock price performance over the ten-year period from December 31, 20022005 to December 31, 2012,2015, compared with the S&P 500, with all values indexed to December 31, 2002.2005. During thethis ten-year period, Alleghany’s common stockholders’ equity per share increased at a compound annual rate of 8.9%8.6%, compared with a compound annual rate of return of 7.1%7.3% for the S&P 500, and Alleghany’s sharethe price of Alleghany common stock (adjusted for stock dividends) appreciated at a 6.6% compound annual rate of return of 8.5%.return.

LOGO

Alleghany’s performance during this period occurred during a time of re-invention and major change in the focus and geographic scope of Alleghany’s operating subsidiaries. At the time Mr. Hicks joined Alleghany in October 2002, Alleghany consisted of approximately $900 million of cash and liquid investments at the holding company level and $500 million of capital deployed in several U.S.-based operating subsidiaries engaged in disparate businesses, including an industrial minerals business (Alleghany’s largest subsidiary at the time), a steel fastener import and export business, a Midwest-based regional property and casualty insurer, and a

LOGO

 

-36--41-


landownerAs indicated by the data presented in the Sacramento, California region. Since then, Alleghany has divested the industrial minerals business and the steel fastener import and export business. In 2012, Alleghany completed the acquisition of Transatlantic. At year-end 2012, Alleghany had approximately $1.0 billion of cash and liquid investments at the holding company level, with approximately $6.4 billion of capital deployed at operating subsidiaries, substantially all of which were engaged in the global reinsurance business and specialty property and casualty insurance business. During this period, stockholders’ equity in Alleghany increased to $6.4 billion at December 31, 2012 from $1.4 billion at December 31, 2002.

Summary of Recent Changes and Adjustments

to Executive Compensation Program in 2013

Subsequent to our acquisition of Transatlantic in March 2012, the Compensation Committee undertook a review ofchart above, Alleghany’s executive compensation program and process to ensure that it continued to support the objectives and principles discussed on pages 32 and 33. As part of this review, in September 2012 after a competitive process, the Compensation Committee selected a new compensation consultant, Frederic W. Cook & Co, Inc., or “FW Cook.” As part of its determination to select FW Cook, the Compensation Committee reviewed and assessed the independence of FW Cook as a firm and the individuals providing advice to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee determined that FW Cook as a firm and the relevant individual advisers were independent.

At the direction of the Compensation Committee, FW Cook reviewed our executive compensation program and process, including by meeting with the Compensation Committee and with members of management. In December 2012, although FW Cook concluded that our existing compensation program was simple and effective in supporting Alleghany’s compensation philosophy and business strategy, FW Cook recommended some refinements for consideration by the Compensation Committee. After further discussion regarding these recommendations with FW Cook and management, the Compensation Committee at its January 2013 meeting adopted some of the recommendations and took additional actions with respect to our 2013 compensation program. A summary of the significant changes and actions taken by the Compensation Committee which will affect compensation in 2013 and future years, includes:

Annual Incentive Plan

The concept of a target and maximum annual incentive opportunity under the 2010 MIP has been eliminated for all participants in favor of a single target bonus opportunity. This revision removes upside/leverage from the 2010 MIP and recognizes the subjective nature of evaluating

-37-


annual financial and individual performance in a long-term results-oriented company like Alleghany. In addition, in light of the greater volatility and larger catastrophe exposure Transatlantic brings to Alleghany and to parallel the four-year measurement period for performance shares awarded under the 2012 LTIP, the formula used to calculate the level of funding for the MIP Pool was revised to use a four-year, rather than a three-year, average catastrophe loss experience for each of Transatlantic and RSUI.

Long-Term Incentive Plan

For our more senior officers (Messrs. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple and Gorham), long-term incentive opportunities in 2013 will continue to be denominated solely in performance shares, the payout of which is based on achievement of the specified performance goal of growth in book value per share. For Mr. Borrelli and other Alleghany officers, 2013 long-term incentive opportunities will be evenly divided between performance shares and shares of time-based restricted stock which cliff-vest four years from date of grant. This move to time-based vesting for a portion of the long-term incentive opportunities for these officers recognizes that they have less ability to impact Alleghany’s overall long-term financial performance, while also providing a retention element to their compensation, particularly in years where performance share payout thresholds are not met.

The Compensation Committee also increased the book value per share growth target for performance shares for the 2013-2016 award period to 7% from 6% and increased the threshold percentage below which no payout will be made to 5% from 3.5%. In addition, the Compensation Committee revised the calculation to be used in determining whether the required growth in book valuecommon stockholders’ equity per share has been achievedrelatively consistent. The trading price of Alleghany’s common stock has been more volatile, reflecting the volatility of the stock market in general. In Alleghany’s view, growth in common stockholders’ equity per share is a better measure of fundamental value creation as compared to eliminate the adjustment for performance relative tomore volatile trading price of Alleghany’s common stock. As such, Alleghany focuses its executive compensation program on building common stockholders’ equity per share over time. As is shown in the chart, Alleghany’s growth in common stockholders’ equity per share has exceeded that of the S&P 500 Index (as described on pages 45return over the past ten years and 46).is considerably less volatile.

Finally, the target performance share award for the 2013-2016 awardDuring this same ten-year period, forwe believe that Mr. Hicks was increased to 300% of salary from 200% and for Mr. Brandon was increased to 200% from 160%. These target increases reflect the Compensation Committee’s consideration of the transformative increase in size and complexity of Alleghany after the acquisition of Transatlantic, as well as the challenge of achieving a payout of 2013-2016 award period performance shares due to the current low interest rate environment, overall economic volatility, the continuing challenging (re)insurance market conditions, and the tightened performance metrics described above. These target increases will increase the percentage of directHicks’s compensation of Mr. Hicks and Mr. Brandon that is dependent uponhas been well-aligned with Alleghany’s long-term financial performance whichas can be seen in the Compensation Committee determined is appropriate in light of their responsibility for such performance.

table below.

 

-38-


For open award periods, Mr. Hicks has the following outstanding equity-based awards, consisting of performance share awards made under the 2007 LTIP and 2012 LTIP:
10-year Pay-TSR(1) Alignment

($ in thousands)

LOGO

 

Grant Date

 

Award Period(2)

 Hurdle Rate (%)  Estimated Future
Payout (# of Shares)
  Estimated Future
Payout ($)(1)
 
  Threshold  Target  Maximum  Threshold  Target  Maximum  Threshold  Target  Maximum 

Jan. 18, 2010

 Jan. 1, 2010 – Dec. 31, 2013  3.5    6.0    8.5    2,295    7,650    11,475   $762,766   $2,542,554   $3,813,831  

Jan. 18, 2011

 Jan. 1, 2011 – Dec. 31, 2014  3.5    6.0    8.5    1,999    6,663    9,995    664,354    2,214,515    3,321,772  

Jan. 17, 2012

 Jan. 1, 2012 – Dec. 31, 2015  3.5    6.0    8.5    2,641    8,804    13,206    877,829    2,926,097    4,389,146  

Jan. 15, 2013

 Jan. 1, 2013 – Dec. 31, 2016  5.0    7.0    9.0    5,619    11,237    16,856    1,867,365    3,734,729    5,602,094  
     

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  

  12,554    34,354    51,532   $4,172,314   $11,417,895   $17,126,843  
     

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
                                   CAGR 

Year

 2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  1 Year  3 Year  10 Year 

CEO Total Compensation(2)

  3,781    4,566    6,522    6,435    6,206    5,636    7,347    7,332    6,216    10,543    6,869    (34.8%)   (2.1%)   6.2

Pension Value Increase/(Decrease)

  850    856    1,160    1,594    1,066    822    1,922    1,259    (1,232  2,914    (23   

CEO SCT Compensation Excluding Pension(3)

  2,931    3,710    5,361    4,840    5,140    4,814    5,425    6,072    7,448    7,629    6,892    (9.7%)   4.3  8.9

Indexed TSR

  100    131    147    105    105    119    113    133    159    184    189    3.1  12.5  6.6

TSR vs. CEO Compensation (excl. pension) Increases / Decreases

  

  12.8%   8.2  (2.3%) 

Indexed BVPS Growth

  100    115    132    126    139    153    161    178    194    219    228    4.4  8.6  8.6

BVPS vs. CEO Compensation (excl. pension) Increases / Decreases

  

  14.1%   4.3  (0.3%) 

 

(1)Based onTotal Shareholder Return reflects Alleghany share price appreciation including the average price per shareimpact of common stock on December 31, 2012 of $332.36.dividends.

(2)Does notIncludes annual fluctuation in pension value. Calculated according to SEC rules except for 2013 and 2015, which include 29,877 shares of restricted stock awardeda negative value for Mr. Hicks’s pension benefit. SEC rules require that negative pension value changes are reflected as a challenge grant“zero” in December 2004. On February 21, 2013, the table.

(3)Represents CEO compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Committee determined that the performance goal for such award had been achieved as of December 31, 2012 and, as a result, these shares vested and were paid out in February 2013. The terms of this award are describedTable on page 56.54, excluding annual fluctuation in pension value.

See “Long-Term Equity Based Incentive Compensation — 2012 Awards” on pages 44 through 46 for general information regarding the terms of performance shares awarded under Alleghany’s long-term incentive plans.

-42-


Compensation Committee Process

At our Annual MeetingCompensation Determination Timetable

General Setting of Stockholders in April 2012, we conducted an advisory vote onSalary and Incentive Awards

Salary adjustments for the compensation of our executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table included in the proxy statement for our 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholderscoming year and approximately 90% of the votes cast on such proposal were voted in favor of the proposal. The Compensation Committee reviewed the outcome of the 2012 advisory vote and believes that the strong level of support achieved reflects favorably on our executive compensation philosophy. Based on the advisory vote of our stockholders at the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in favor of holding an annual vote on executive compensation, the Board determined that Alleghany will hold stockholder advisory votes on executive compensation every year. The Compensation Committee intends to review the outcome of the 2013 advisory vote and future advisory votes on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as one of the relevant factors in structuring our executive compensation program.

-39-


Compensation adjustments andnew incentive awards are generally made annually by the Compensation Committee at a meeting in January. Mr. Dalrymple supportsIn 2015, the Compensation Committee determined 2015 salaries and 2015 annual incentive awards at its January 2015 meeting and 2015-2018 long-term incentive awards at a meeting in early February 2015 for all of the Named Executive Officers. These meetings followed the January 2015 Board meeting, at which the Board reviewed and discussed:

an evaluation of preliminary 2014 financial results for Alleghany;

an evaluation of Mr. Hicks’s 2014 performance and priorities for 2015;

a report by Mr. Hicks on management succession and development throughout Alleghany;

the recommendation of Mr. Hicks regarding the individual performance of each Named Executive Officer; and

Alleghany’s projections and plan for 2015 through 2017.

Setting of Mr. Hicks’s 2015 Compensation

In determining Mr. Hicks’s 2015 compensation, the Compensation Committee at its work. Additionally,January 2015 meeting reviewed Mr. Hicks’s 2014 performance and 2015 priorities, as described above, as well as all components of Mr. Hicks’s 2014 compensation, including annual salary, annual cash incentive compensation in respect of 2014, outstanding performance share awards, values of previous awards of restricted stock and benefits under Alleghany’s Deferred Compensation Plan, Alleghany’s medical, long-term disability and other employee welfare plans and the freezing of Alleghany’s Retirement Plan at year-end 2013.

Payouts of Awards in Respect of 2015 Performance

The Compensation Committee generally determines the payout of awards for prior performance periods at a meeting in late February, upon the completion of the year-end audit of prior year financial statements. With respect to 2015, the Compensation Committee determined payouts to the Named Executive Officers, including Mr. Hicks, of 2015 annual incentive awards and 2012-2015 long-term incentive awards at its February 23, 2016 meeting. Payout determinations were based on Board and Compensation Committee discussions and determinations regarding Alleghany’s financial performance for 2015 and applicable award periods, an evaluation of Mr. Hicks’s 2015 performance, and the recommendation of Mr.  Hicks regarding the individual performance of the other Named Executive Officers.

Compensation Committee Advisors and Services

The Compensation Committee has retained FWFrederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., or “FW Cook,” as a compensation consultant to assist the Compensation Committee in its review of executive and director compensation practices, including the competitiveness of Alleghany executive compensation, executive compensation program design matters, market trends and technical considerations. Prior to its determination to retain FW Cook, the Compensation Committee reviewed and assessed the independence of FW Cook as a firm and the individuals providing advice to the Compensation Committee in compliance with the NYSE’s listing standards. The Compensation Committee determined that FW Cook as a firm and the relevant individual advisers were independent.

The nature and scope of services that FW Cook provides to the Compensation Committee include:include the following: competitive market compensation analyses,analyses; assistance with the redesign of any director or

-43-


management compensation or benefit programs as necessary or requested,requested; assistance with respect to analyzing the impact of regulatory and/or accounting developments on Alleghanyour compensation plans and programs,programs; and preparation for and attendance at selected Compensation Committee meetings. FW Cook is also available to advise the Compensation Committee and management on various executive compensation matters involving Alleghany’sour operating subsidiaries. The Chairman of the Compensation Committee reviews and approves all services provided by FW Cook and fees to be paid by Alleghany to FW Cook.

In evaluating our executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee has been advised by FW Cook as to the compensation levels of other companies that might compete with us for executive talent. Competitive market data have been periodically developed by FW Cook from several different sources, including proxy statements. WeAlthough we do not seek to set our executive compensation toprimarily based on any benchmarks or peer group, but usewe believe that information regarding pay practices at other companies is nevertheless useful in two respects. First, we recognize that our compensation practices must be competitive in the competitivemarketplace. Second, independent marketplace information is one of the many factors that we consider in assessing the reasonableness of compensation. In this regard, in considering compensation for the NEOs, the Compensation Committee considers comparative market data periodically requested from FW Cook. FW Cook last prepared this analysis in November 2015 and FW Cook’s peer group companies were:

Allied World

EnduranceReinsurance Group of America

Arch Capital

Erie IndemnityRenaissanceRe

Axis Capital Holdings

Everest Re GroupValidus

Chubb

Markel CorporationWhite Mountains

Cincinnati Financial

Old Republic InternationalW.R. Berkley

CNA Financial

ProgressiveXL Group

This peer group was selected based on publicly traded companies that generally as a group (i) approximate our scope of business and that of our subsidiaries, including revenue and market capitalization, (ii) are similar to provide insights intous in the importance to their business of capital allocation, investments and risk management, (iii) compete with us for a comparable pool of talent, and (iv) reflect our compensation levels, mix and strategies. Ourglobal presence.

Additionally, our senior officers have all been recruited mid-career, and our compensation must be reasonably competitive with that of their former employers. However, we do not seek to compete for executive talent solely on the basis of compensation. Rather, we also compete by offering a unique professional opportunity to work in a high integrity environment where the focus is on building long-term stockholder value.

Our objective isAdvisory Vote on Executive Compensation

Alleghany holds a stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation, commonly referred to as “say on pay,” every year. The Compensation Committee monitors the results of Alleghany’s “say-on-pay” proposal and related stockholder feedback when evaluating the effectiveness of Alleghany’s compensation policies and disclosures, particularly in the event of a negative vote or significant change in the percentage of favorable votes with regard to such proposal.

Alleghany also actively engages with its significant stockholders to gauge their opinions on a range of topics, including executive compensation. We view this as an important opportunity to develop broader relationships with key investors over the long–term and to engage in open dialogue on compensation and governance related issues.

At our Annual Meeting of Stockholders in April 2015, we received strong support for our executive compensation program, with approximately 97% stockholder approval of our say on pay proposal. When setting compensation for 2016, the Compensation Committee considered both the level of voting support from our stockholders on our say-on-pay vote, as well as stockholder feedback when evaluating our executive compensation plans and determined that a significant portionno changes to the Alleghany’s executive compensation program were warranted. The Compensation Committee will continue to review the design of the Named Executive Officers’executive compensation be tiedprogram in light of future “say-on-pay” votes, developments in executive compensation, and Alleghany’s pay-for-performance philosophy to Alleghany’s financial performance without encouragingensure that the useexecutive compensation program continues to serve the best interests of excessive financial leverageAlleghany and the taking of imprudent risks. Thus, annual cash incentive compensation under the 2010 MIP and long-term equity-based incentives under the 2002 LTIP, 2007 LTIP and 2012 LTIP are “capped” at a maximum payout once a certain level of financial performance is attained, and performance goals are set at realistic levels. Finally, we do not grant stock options to our officers. Our goal is to promote risk-adjusted long-term growth in the intrinsic value of our common stock and not just its market price. We believe that over time intrinsic value will be reflected in the market price of our common stock.stockholders.

 

-40--44-


The Compensation Committee determined 2012 salaries and incentive awards for all of the Named Executive Officers except Mr. Brandon at a meeting in January 2012, which followed a January 2012 meeting of the Board, at which the Board reviewed and discussed an evaluation of Mr. Hicks’ 2011 performance and priorities for 2012, a report by Mr. Hicks on management succession and development throughout the Alleghany group, the recommendation of Mr. Hicks regarding the individual performance of each Named Executive Officer except Mr. Brandon, and Alleghany’s strategic plan for 2012-2016. Mr. Brandon’s 2012 salary and incentive awards were negotiated as part of his employment agreement with Alleghany dated as of November 20, 2011, which became effective on March 6, 2012.

In determining Mr. Hicks’ 2012 compensation, the Compensation Committee reviewed Mr. Hicks’ 2011 performance and 2012 priorities, as described above, as well as all components of Mr. Hicks’ 2011 compensation, including annual salary, annual cash incentive compensation in respect of 2011 under the 2010 MIP, long-term incentive compensation under the 2002 LTIP and 2007 LTIP, values of previous awards of restricted stock and benefits under Alleghany’s Deferred Compensation Plan, Alleghany’s Retirement Plan and the medical, long-term disability and other employee welfare plans.

The Compensation Committee determined payouts of 2012 incentive awards for the Named Executive Officers at a meeting in February 2013, following the January 2013 meeting of the Board, at which the Board reviewed and discussed an evaluation of Mr. Hicks’ 2012 performance, the recommendation of Mr. Hicks regarding the individual performance of the other Named Executive Officers, and Alleghany’s financial performance for 2012 and applicable award periods.

ComponentsElements of 2015 Compensation

The componentsprincipal elements of compensation paid to theour Named Executive Officers in respect of 20122015 consisted principally of:

 

salaries;

 

annual cash incentive compensation under the 2010 MIP;

 

annual grants of long-term equity-based incentives;

retirement benefits;incentives under the 2012 LTIP; and

 

an annual savings benefitsbenefit equal to 15% of base salary.

In addition, our Named Executive Officers receive a benefit, assuming the completion of five years of service with Alleghany or a subsidiary of Alleghany, under a retirement plan, although such benefit was frozen in 2013.

The percentage that these elements represent of the 2015 compensation for our Deferred Compensation Plan.

chief executive officer and our other Named Executive Officers is reflected below.

 

-41-


LOGO

Set out below in more detail is a description and analysis of each of these componentselements of our compensation program.

Salary

We seek to pay salaries that are sufficiently competitive to attract and retain executive talent. The Compensation Committee generally makes salary adjustments annually, in consultation with our compensation consultant,FW Cook, based on salaries for the prior year, general inflation, individual performance and internal comparability considerations. In 2012, Mr. Hicks received a 25% increase in salary, after taking into account that his last salary increase had occurred six years before, his effective leadership during that time, and internal comparability considerations. Mr. Gorham received no 2012 salary increase. Mr. Dalrymple received a salary increase of 18% and Mr. Borrelli received an increase of 5% based upon the recommendation of Mr. Hicks, taking into account general inflation, individual performance, internal comparability considerations and,The following actions were taken with respect to Mr. Dalrymple, his increased responsibilities upon his promotion to Senior Vice President.2015 salaries for our Named Executive Officers:

    2014 Salary      2015 Salary   Rationale

Mr. Hicks

   1,000,000    LOGO      1,000,000    No change due to continued emphasis on performance-linked compensation

Mr. Brandon

   800,000    LOGO      800,000    No change due to continued emphasis on performance-linked compensation

Mr. Dalrymple

   600,000    LOGO      630,000    Recognition of 2014 performance and internal comparability considerations with other Senior Vice Presidents

Mr. Gorham

   600,000    LOGO      600,000    No change due to sufficiently competitive level of pay

Mr. Sennott

   600,000    LOGO      630,000    Recognition of 2014 performance and internal comparability considerations with other Senior Vice Presidents

-45-


Annual Cash Incentive Compensation

We generally pay annual cash incentives to theour Named Executive Officers under the Management Incentive Plan then in effect. These annual cash incentive awards are intended to provide a pay-for-performance element for the achievement of shorter-term objectives. Awards granted in 2015 were made under the 2010 MIP. Target annual incentiveStockholders approved the 2015 MIP at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which replaced the 2010 MIP. Awards granted in 2016 will be made under the 2015 MIP, which is substantially similar to the 2010 MIP.

In making 2015 awards under the 2010 MIP, are stated asthe Compensation Committee recognized that, given the nature of Alleghany’s business and long-term approach, how we achieve shorter-term objectives can be a percentage of eachsubjective process, but believed this is mitigated by the fact that these 2015 annual cash incentive awards were subject to two meaningful limitations. First, no payout to any Named Executive Officer’s base salary. TargetOfficer could exceed the amount of his maximum annual incentive awardsopportunity set at the beginning of 2015, resulting in respecta $2.5 million maximum award opportunity for Mr. Hicks and an aggregate maximum award opportunity of performanceapproximately $5.7 million for 2012 were made to all of theour Named Executive Officers except Mr. Brandonas a group. Second, funding of the 2015 Incentive Pool Amount (as defined below) is limited by the level of earnings produced by management in 2015. To the extent the funding of the 2015 Incentive Pool Amount had been less than the aggregate maximum award amount of approximately $5.7 million for our Named Executive Officers as a group, a pro-rata reduction of individual award amounts would have occurred. To the extent that Alleghany had a loss for 2015, no payout would have been made under the 2010 MIP. In sum, payouts under the 2010 MIP for 2015 performance are the lesser of (i) the 2015 Incentive Pool Amount or (ii) the maximum opportunity for management (as may be reduced by the Compensation Committee onfor individual performance).

Process

The Compensation Committee makes annual incentive awards for the upcoming year in January 27, 2012,of that year. 2015 target annual incentive awards and target bonusmaximum incentive opportunities were 110% of salary for Mr. Hicks, 65% of salary for each of Messrs. Gorham and Dalrymple and 40% for Mr. Borrelli. Mr. Brandon’s target bonus opportunity of 80% of salary was set forth in his employment agreement with Alleghany. Maximum incentive opportunities for 2012 were 150% of target awards. as follows:

    

2015

Salary

   Target
Opportunity($/%)
   Maximum
Opportunity ($)(1)
 

Mr. Hicks

  $1,000,000    $1,700,000(170%)    $2,550,000  

Mr. Brandon

   800,000     1,080,000(135%)     1,620,000  

Mr. Dalrymple

   630,000     409,500  (65%)     614,250  

Mr. Gorham

   600,000     180,000  (30%)     270,000  

Mr. Sennott

   630,000     409,500  (65%)     614,250  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Totals

  $3,660,000    $3,779,000               $5,668,500  

(1)The maximum opportunity percentage for each respective Named Executive Officer is 150% of such Named Executive Officer’s target award.

The differing target awards as a percentage of salary reflect the Compensation Committee’s determinations of appropriate levels and mix of compensation components, taking into account competitive considerations, varying levels of responsibility, within Alleghany, internal comparability, and the implicit impact of the various Named Executive Officer levels on the accomplishment of ourAlleghany’s financial, strategic and operational objectives.objectives and competitive considerations.

For 2012, payoutPayout of awards under the 2010 MIP to our most senior Named Executive Officers, Messrs. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple and Gorham, wasis tied to the achievement of a specified financial performance objectivesobjective, subject to reduction in respect of Alleghany performance and/or individual performance. The 2012financial performance objective is set in January, after evaluating projected earnings for 2015 and determining each Named Executive Officer’s appropriate target opportunity amount. With respect to individual performance objectives, each of our Named Executive Officers submits individual objectives for the coming year, with Mr. Hicks submitting his to the Board and the other Named Executive Officers submitting their individual objectives to Mr. Hicks. These

-46-


objectives are in addition to the core responsibilities of our Named Executive Officers. Status updates on the achievement of such individual objectives and performance of core responsibilities are given through the year by each Named Executive Officer, culminating in a final report made in advance of payout determinations made by the Board and Compensation Committee at the beginning of the following year. In this regard, Mr. Hicks provides a self-evaluation to the Board of his performance against objectives during the year and Messrs. Brandon, Dalrymple, Gorham and Sennott provided Mr. Hicks with the same, which Mr. Hicks then reviewed with the Compensation Committee.

Financial Performance Objective

The 2015 financial performance goal established by the Compensation Committee for annual incentive awards to Messrs. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple

-42-


and Gorham under the 2010 MIPour Named Executive Officers was based on a funding approach, with a 2012 incentive poolwhich was capped at an amount equal to consist3% of 4% of 20122015 earnings before income taxes, as reported in Alleghany’s audited financial statements, excludingas adjusted, or the “2015 Incentive Pool Amount,” to:

exclude effects of accounting changes, charges for goodwill or intangibles impairment (including other than temporary impairment charges),;

exclude expenses incurred in connection with actual and potential acquisitions,acquisitions; and after deduction

deduct from 2015 earnings a rolling four-year (2011-2014) average of catastrophe losses at RSUI, our principal insurance subsidiary, and TransRe, our principal reinsurance subsidiary, instead of actual 2015 catastrophe losses at RSUI and TransRe.

With respect to catastrophe losses, RSUI’s 2011-2014 catastrophe average was $94.1 million, or the “RSUI CAT Average,” compared with 2015 actual catastrophe losses of (i) RSUI, Alleghany’s principal insurance subsidiary, for 2009-2011$21.1 million, net of $43.9prior year development and reinsurance reinstatement premiums, and TransRe’s 2011-2014 catastrophe average was $279.5 million, (the “RSUIor the “TransRe CAT Average”), but excluding RSUIAverage,” compared with 2015 actual catastrophe losses in excess of the RSUI CAT Average$(0.1) million, net of prior year development and (ii) Transatlantic, Alleghany’s principal reinsurance subsidiary, for 2009-2011reinstatement premiums. These differences mean that an additional $352.6 million of $349.5 million (the “TRH CAT Average”), but excluding TRH catastrophe losses were deducted from Alleghany’s pre-tax earnings in excess ofdetermining the TRH CAT Average (the “2012funding for the 2015 Incentive Pool”). Pool Amount than would have been deducted from Alleghany’s pre-tax earnings using actual 2015 catastrophe losses.

The use of the RSUI CAT Average and TRHTransRe CAT Average rather than the actual amount of RSUI and Transatlantictheir respective 2015 catastrophe losses in determining the amount of the 2012 incentive pool was based upon the Compensation Committee’s acknowledgement that RSUI and TransatlanticTransRe are significant writers of catastrophe exposed property (re)insurance and that management cannot predict the occurrence or severity of catastrophe losses in any particular year. The Compensation Committee setUsing a four-year average recognizes that catastrophe losses are a cost of doing business and accounts for them in a manner consistent with Alleghany’s focus on long-term performance. In this regard, actual catastrophe losses, whether in excess of, or less than, actual catastrophe losses in a particular year, impact funding calculations for annual incentive pools during the aggregate maximumfour-year averaging period in which they are included. A year in which Alleghany experiences significant catastrophe losses will impact MIP annual incentive pool funding for all payoutsthe subsequent four years, holding management fully accountable for such catastrophe losses.

-47-


Individual Performance Objectives

In January 2015, Mr. Hicks provided the Board, and Messrs. Brandon, Dalrymple, Gorham and Sennott provided Mr. Hicks, with their objectives for 2015 that were in addition to performance of awards madetheir core responsibilities. These core and 2015 objectives for our Named Executive Officers included the following:

Core Responsibilities2015 Objectives

Mr. Hicks

•    Building stockholder value over the long-term, reported and measured regularly

•    Consolidated 2015 financial results

•    Ultimate responsibility for reinsurance and insurance subsidiary underwriting performance

•    Ultimate responsibility for equity and fixed income portfolio investment performance

•    Management development at parent and subsidiaries

•    Improve the profitability of CapSpecialty and PacificComp

•    Work with TransRe on its strategic alternatives in the current reinsurance market cycle

•    Oversee the continued development of Alleghany Capital, including acquisitions at an attractive price

•    Assess and revise Roundwood Asset Management public equities investment process and consider alternative strategies

•    Manage corporate investment portfolio for attractive long-term total returns

Mr. Brandon

•    Primary operational oversight of Alleghany’s reinsurance and insurance subsidiaries

•    Ensure that each insurance subsidiary meets its 2015 business plan

•    Oversee the operations of TransRe from a parent-level and stockholder perspective as Chairman of TransRe’s Board of Directors

•    Assist the CEO with the strategic development of Alleghany and its insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries

•    Support (re)insurance subsidiaries in achieving their profitability targets and strategic goals

•    Evaluate strategic developments and issues affecting Alleghany and its (re)insurance operations

•    Analyze and lead potential (re)insurance acquisition or investment opportunities

•    Help TransRe to develop profitable business opportunities

•    Work with PacificComp and CapSpecialty in executing their business plans

Mr. Dalrymple

•    Ultimate oversight for management of all legal issues at parent and subsidiaries, including transactional, litigation and regulatory

•    Oversight of corporate governance and secretarial functions

•    Ultimate legal oversight of SEC disclosure reports

•    Ultimate oversight of legal costs at parent and subsidiaries

•    Work with investor relations on target governance outreach to Alleghany’s significant stockholders

•    Work with Board on new Committee processes and pending 2016 Board retirement matters

•    Manage legal diligence and oversight of TransRe strategic initiatives

•    Analyze and report on Stranded Oil Resources Corporation existing agreements with Laredo Oil in connection with strategic evaluation

-48-


Core Responsibilities2015 Objectives

Mr. Gorham

•    Management of $13.8 billion fixed income portfolio

•    Chairman of TransRe, RSUI and PacificComp Board of Directors investment committees

•    Treasurer for Alleghany

•    Determine optimal investment strategies to reduce alternative minimum taxes and increase utilization of foreign tax credits

•    Evaluate and invest in a new fixed income asset class

•    Assist with the evaluation of non-fixed income investment opportunities

Mr. Sennott

•    Principal financial officer responsible for the fair and accurate presentation of the financial results

•    Oversight of Alleghany financial function and maintenance of control environment

•    Responsible for capital management and annual strategic planning efforts

•    Responsible for rating agency relationships and management

•    Ensure quality, accuracy and content over the financial statements and public filings of Alleghany

•    Coordinate the communication and relationship management efforts with rating agencies

•    Oversee Alleghany investor relations function

•    Oversee Alleghany stock repurchase and debt maturity initiatives

•    Negotiate a new operating lease for Alleghany headquarters

Payouts under the 2010 MIP with respect ofto 2015 Performance

Based on our 2015 financial results, the 20122015 Incentive Pool at $4.3 million.

For 2012, 4% of our earnings before income taxes, adjusted to set RSUI catastrophe losses at the RSUI CAT Average and Transatlantic catastrophe losses at the TRH CAT Average,Funding Amount was $32.6 million. Such amount exceeded the $4.3$16.8 million, aggregate maximum for all payouts of awards made in respect of the 2012 Incentive Pool set by the Compensation Committee in January 2012, so the total amount paid in respect of such awards was capped at $4.3 million. As required for an award intended to be a qualifying award under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), each ofthat Messrs. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple, Gorham and Gorham was allocated an interestSennott were eligible to receive maximum payout in February 2016 of their 2015 incentive opportunities, aggregating to $5.7 million, under the 2012 Incentive Pool2010 MIP based upon his target award as a percentageon achievement of the aggregate target awards in respect of the 2012 Incentive Pool. Thus, for 2012 MIP awards made to Messrs. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple and Gorham, financial performance was based upon the 2012 Incentive Pool with the Compensation Committee specifically empoweredgoal, subject to reduce awards, individually or in the aggregate, in its discretion and in any amount, based on its evaluation of the overall financial and operational performance of Messrs. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple and Gorham and theirreduction for individual performance.

At its meeting on February 21, 2013,23, 2016, the Compensation Committee evaluated Alleghany’s overall corporate performance and the individual performance of Mr. Hicks, and Mr. Hicks’Hicks’s recommendation regarding the individual performance of Messrs. Brandon, Dalrymple and Gorham, and Alleghany’s overall corporate performance. Regarding individual performance, Mr. Hicks’ recommendations reflected the substantial work that Messrs. Brandon, Dalrymple and Gorham had done in 2012 with respect to completing the

other Named Executive Officers.

-43-


Transatlantic acquisition, integrating the Transatlantic operations with those of Alleghany, particularly with respect to finance, legal and investment oversight, and superior performance in their areas of primary responsibility. With respect to Mr. Hicks’Hicks’s individual performance, the Compensation Committee noted the following factors, among others, during 2015:

strong underwriting results at TransRe and RSUI , particularly in light of a highly competitive (re)insurance environment;

continued improvement in underwriting results at CapSpecialty and PacificComp compared with 2014 underwriting results;

continued build-out of Alleghany Capital portfolio companies, including the acquisition of IPS;

completed reorganization of equity investment function and execution of change in equity investment strategy;

relatively modest growth in common stockholders’ equity per share of 4.4% in 2015; and

dampened investment performance in 2015 compared with 2014.

After consideration of these and other factors, the Compensation Committee determined to make a payout to Mr. Hicks of his leadership in completing2015 annual bonus opportunity at target, or $1.7 million.

-49-


Regarding individual performance, Mr. Hicks’s recommendations reflected the Transatlantic acquisition,achievement of individual objectives for Messrs. Brandon, Dalrymple, Gorham, and Sennott. For Mr. Brandon, the payout reflected the very profitable 2015 underwriting results at TransRe and RSUI, underwriting result improvements at CapSpecialty and PacificComp, support of TransRe initiatives and accomplishment of strategic initiatives at our (re)insurance subsidiaries. For Mr. Dalrymple, the payout reflected superior performance of his overall responsibility forcore responsibilities and achievement of his 2015 objectives, particularly with respect to corporate governance initiatives and oversight. For Mr. Sennott, the successful integrationpayout reflected superior performance of Transatlantichis core responsibilities as well as achievement of his 2015 objectives, including ensuring quality, accuracy and superior work withcontent of Alleghany’s expanded stockholder base andfinancial reporting, overseeing Alleghany’s investor relations development. and stock repurchase and debt maturity initiatives and negotiating a new operating lease for Alleghany’s headquarters. For Mr. Gorham, the payout reflected superior performance of his core responsibilities as well as achievement of his 2015 objectives, including determining optimal investment strategies to reduce alternative maximum taxes and increase use of foreign tax credits, evaluating and investing in a new fixed income asset class and assisting in the evaluation of non-fixed income investment opportunities.

Following such evaluation,the evaluations by Mr. Hicks of the other Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee authorized individual payouts of 2012 Incentive Pool awards2015 annual bonus opportunities at maximum to Messrs. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple, Gorham and Gorham in an aggregate amount equal to the $4.3 million maximum available award payout.

For 2012, Mr. Borrelli (who did not participate in the 2012 Incentive Pool) was assigned a target bonus opportunity as a percentage of salary under the 2010 MIP, with a maximum incentive opportunity equal to 150% of his target award. Payout of the awardSennott under the 2010 MIP for 2012 for Mr. Borrelli was based on individual performance goals relatingan aggregate payout to his primary responsibilities includingthem in the development, implementation, and administrationamount of accounting policies and oversight of Alleghany’s accounting and financial controls functions, including as they relate to filings with the SEC and other regulatory reports. At its meeting on February 21, 2013, the Compensation Committee evaluated Mr. Hicks’ recommendation regarding Mr. Borrelli’s superior individual performance with respect to his primary responsibilities, particularly with respect to integrating Transatlantic’s financial reporting function. Following such evaluation, the Compensation Committee authorized payout of a 2012 award under the 2010 MIP to Mr. Borrelli. The award to Mr. Borrelli for 2012 under the 2010 MIP was not intended to be a qualifying award for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code.approximately $3.1  million.

Annual cash incentives for 2013 under the 2010 MIP will be paid pursuant to target awards established by the Compensation Committee for the Named Executive Officers in January 2013.

Long-Term Equity BasedEquity-Based Incentive Compensation

In 2012,2015, we made awards of long-term incentive compensation to theour Named Executive Officers under our 2007the 2012 LTIP. Historically, long-term incentive awards have been made primarily in the form of performance shares and, in a fewcertain cases, performance-basedshares of restricted stock and have been structured in a manner intended to qualify as performance-based for purposesrestricted stock units. Awards of Section 162(m) of the Code. The 2007 LTIP expired by its terms in April 2012, and stockholders approvedperformance shares under the 2012 LTIP are intended to provide a pay-for-performance component of compensation based upon the provisionsachievement of longer-term financial objectives focused on growth in book value per share. Awards of restricted stock or restricted stock units under the 2012 LTIP are intended to provide a retention component of compensation, the value of which are essentiallyis tied to the same as the provisionsmarket price of the 2007 LTIP, at the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

our common stock.

Performance Shares

-44-


For the 2012-20152015-2018 award period, the Compensation Committee based the number of performance shares awarded to each Named Executive Officer upon a percentage of such officer’s 20122015 salary divided by the average closing priceprices of common stock for the 30-day period prior to the mailing of material for the meeting of the Compensation Committee at which such awards were made. Such percentages of 20122015 salary were 200% for Mr. Hicks, 160% for Mr. Brandon, 120% for each of Mr. Dalrymple and Mr. Gorham and 60% for Mr. Borrelli. as follows:

    2015 Salary   Opportunity %   Opportunity $  

Mr. Hicks

  $1,000,000     400    $4,000,000  

Mr. Brandon

   800,000     300     2,400,000  

Mr. Dalrymple

   630,000     100     630,000  

Mr. Gorham

   600,000     45     270,000  

Mr. Sennott

   630,000     100     630,000  
      

 

 

 

Total 2015 Performance Share Opportunities

  

  $7,930,000  
      

 

 

 

The differing target awards as a percentage of salary reflect the Compensation Committee’s determinations of appropriate levels and mix of compensation components, taking into account competitive considerations, varying levels of responsibility within Alleghany, internal comparability and the implicit impact of the various Named Executive Officers on the accomplishment of our financial, strategic and operational objectives.objectives, and competitive considerations. With respect to Mr. Hicks in particular, his 2015 performance share award reflected the Compensation Committee’s determination to tie Mr. Hicks’s compensation closely to Alleghany’s financial performance and its views of the

-50-


challenge of meeting the financial performance goals for the 2015-2018 award period in light of the current interest rate environment and (re)insurance market environment. For 2016 performance share awards, the opportunities for each of our Named Executive Officers, expressed as a percentage of salary, were the same as those set forth above for 2015.

In making performance share awards for the 2012-20152015-2018 period, the Compensation Committee took account of (i) of:

Alleghany’s financial objective in the current economic environment of increasinggrowing book value per share at rates of 7-10% over the long term without employing excessive amounts of financial leverage and without taking imprudent risks, (ii) risks;

prevailing financial and economic conditions and uncertainties and (iii) uncertainties;

the alignment of performance goals with Alleghany’s near-term strategy, with a particular emphasis on maintaining Alleghany’s financial strength. Taking into account such conditions, Alleghany’s strategy, strength; and

the prevailing 10-year U.S. Treasury rates and prevailing equity risk premiums adjusted for Alleghany’s estimated stock volatility relative to the market,market.

Taking into account such conditions, Alleghany’s strategy the Compensation Committee set the following performance goals for the 2012-2015 awards:2015-2018 period:

 

maximum payouts at 150% of the value of one share of common stock on the payout date for average annual compound growth in our Book Value Per Share (as defined by the Compensation Committee pursuant to the 20072012 LTIP) of 8.5%9% or more over the four-year award period ending December 31, 2015,2018, as adjusted for stock dividends and as adjusted for performance relative to the S&P 500 Index (as discussed below);dividends;

 

target payouts at 100% of the value of one share of common stock on the payout date if such growth equals 6%7%, and payouts at 50% of the value of one share of common stock on the payout date if such growth equals 4.25%5%, payouts at 30% of the value of one share of common stock on the payout date if such growth equals 3.5%,with payouts for growth between the foregoing levels to be determined by straight line interpolation; and

 

no payouts if such growth is less than 3.5%5%.

With regard to performance shares awarded for the 2012-2015 period, provided that Alleghany’s average compound annual growth in Book Value Per Share for the 2012-2015 period is positive, it will be adjusted to include the excess, if any, of such average annual compound growth over the Total Return on the S&P 500 Index (whether positive or negative and

-45-


as calculated by Bloomberg Finance) for such period. To the extentThe Compensation Committee believed that the Total Return onabove payout thresholds would be challenging to meet, particularly in light of slow U.S. and global economic growth, a prolonged period of very low interest rates, relatively high current valuations in equity markets and the S&P 500 Index over a four-year period measuresimperative to maintain underwriting discipline in increasingly competitive reinsurance and insurance markets due to an abundance of both traditional and new alternative underwriting capacity.

Restricted Stock Units

In 2015, long-term incentive opportunities for Mr. Dalrymple and Mr. Sennott included 697 restricted stock units, representing awards set at 50% of their respective base salaries, which cliff-vest four years from date of grant. These grants of restricted stock units are intended to further align Mr. Dalrymple’s and Mr. Sennott’s interests with those of our stockholders, while incenting the U.S. earnings environment, growthprudence desired in Alleghany’s Book Value Per Share at a greater rate may be considered a measure of Alleghany’s performancetheir roles as General Counsel and chief financial officer in preserving stockholder value. Since performance share awards are capped and tied to stock price, the Compensation Committee considered that the relative performance adjustment should not create any disconnect with Alleghany’s goal of increasing stockholder value. This relative performance adjustment based on comparison with the Total Return on the S&P 500 Index was eliminated for performance share awards made by the Compensation Committee in January 2013 for the 2013-2016 award period.

Perquisites

Our general practice is to not provide perquisites or other personal benefits to our Named Executive Officers. In 2012,2015, no Named Executive Officer received more than $10,000 in perquisites or other personal benefits.

Compensation Policies and Practices Relating to Risk Management

Risk analysis has always been part of Alleghany’s review and design of its group-wide executive incentive plans, and the Compensation Committee regularly monitors compensation policies, practices and outstanding awards to determine whether its risk management and incentive objectives are being met with respect to group-wide employee incentives. Alleghany’s material risks include investment risk (debt and equity), as well as catastrophe losses and material mispricing of risk at Alleghany’s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries. The Board’s and management’s risk oversight is discussed on pages 3 and 4. The Compensation Committee does not believe that risks arising from Alleghany’s group-wide compensation policies and practices for its employees are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Alleghany. In this regard, as discussed on page 32, Alleghany’s short and long-term incentive plans are capped at individual levels so not to incent imprudent risk taking to achieve outsized payouts. In addition, Alleghany officers are required to own a substantial amount of common stock to ensure that they maintain a significant stake in Alleghany’s long-term success, Alleghany also has in place a compensation clawback policy applicable to its officers to further discourage imprudent risk taking, and Alleghany does not grant stock options to officers as it does not wish to reward or punish them for exogenous short-term market price movements. The managements of Alleghany’s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are incented to write profitable business and have no incentives to grow premium volume by underpricing risk. The Compensation Committee seeks to set realistic

-46-


incentive goals, monitors them in light of economic conditions and Alleghany’s strategy and risk tolerance, and will consider appropriate adjustments in respect thereof in the event of any conflict between incentives and the Board’s strategy and risk tolerance.

Retirement Plan

We offer retirement plan benefits to all our employees. Retirement benefits for our Named Executive Officers are provided under the Retirement Plan. We believe the Retirement Plan provides a competitive advantage in helping Alleghany attract senior-level talent. In addition, the benefits offered by the Retirement Plan provide an important stable component of total compensation. Under the Retirement Plan, a participant must have completed five years of service with Alleghany or a subsidiary of Alleghany before he or she is vested in, and thus has a right to receive, any retirement benefits following his or her termination of employment. Prior to January 1, 2011, the annual retirement benefit under the Retirement Plan, if paid in the form of a joint and survivor life annuity to a married participant who retires on reaching age 65 with 15 or more years of service, was equal to 67% of the participant’s highest average annual base salary and annual cash bonus over a consecutive three-year period during the last ten years or, if shorter, the full calendar years of employment. On December 13, 2010, pursuant to authority delegated by the Board, the Compensation Committee amended the Retirement Plan, effective January 1, 2011, by eliminating the inclusion of annual cash bonuses earned for years subsequent to 2010 in the computation of benefits. As amended, the annual retirement benefit would be the greater of (i) the retirement benefit accrued by the participant at December 31, 2010, based upon eligibility for vesting and years of service credited at such date, pursuant to the benefit formula in effect at December 31, 2010, or (ii) a full service retirement benefit, if paid in the form of a joint and survivor annuity to a married participant who retires on reaching age 65 with 15 or more years of service, equal to 67% of the participant’s highest average annual base salary over a consecutive three-year period during the last ten years or, if shorter, the full calendar years of employment. Long-term incentives are not taken into account in computing retirement benefits.

Deferred Compensation Plan

Alleghany creditsWe credit an amount equal to 15% of a Named Executive Officer’s base salary to the Deferred Compensation Plan each year. Entitlement to this savings benefit is not based on performance. As it is Alleghany’sour intention that a significant portion of compensation for our Named Executive Officers be contingent on

-51-


performance objectives, the savings benefit offered by the Deferred Compensation Plan provides a stable component of total compensation. In addition, the Deferred Compensation Plan permits our Named Executive Officers to elect to

-47-


defer the receipt, and thus the taxation, of all or part of their base salary and their annual cash bonus. A participant may choose to have savings benefit credit amounts and deferred salary and bonus amounts either credited with interest, treated as though invested in our common stock or increased or decreased by an amount proportionate to the growth or decline in our stockholders’ equity per share.

Retirement Plan

Retirement benefits for our Named Executive Officers are provided under the Retirement Plan. Under the Retirement Plan, a participant must have completed five years of service with Alleghany or a subsidiary of Alleghany before he or she is vested in, and thus has a right to receive, any retirement benefits following his or her termination of employment. Effective December 31, 2013, the Retirement Plan was closed to new participants and no additional benefits for existing participants accrue after such date. Any participant who was not vested in his or her accrued benefit as of December 31, 2013 will continue to have future service with Alleghany credited toward the Retirement Plan’s five-year vesting requirement.

Financial Statement Restatements

It is our Board’s policy that the Compensation Committee will, to the extent permitted by governing law, have the sole and absolute authority to make retroactive adjustments to any cash or equity-based incentive compensation awarded or paid to any of our officers where the award or payment was predicated upon the achievement of performance goals that were subsequently restated or otherwise adjusted in a manner that would reduce the size of any such award or payment. In this regard, the Compensation Committee is authorized to have Alleghany seek to recover any amount the Compensation Committee determines was inappropriately received by any officer.

Hedging and Pledging Policies

We maintain a policy on insider trading and compliance that prohibits our officers from directly or indirectly purchasing or using financial instruments that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of Alleghany securities they own. In addition, under such policy, officers are prohibited from pledging Alleghany securities as collateral.

Executive Officer Stock Ownership Guidelines

We expect our executive officers to achieve ownership of our common stock having an aggregate value (based upon the higher of market value or book value) equal to a multiple of base salary, as follows: for our President and chief executive officer, the multiple is five times base salary; for our Executive Vice President, the multiple is four times base salary; for our Senior Vice Presidents, the multiple is three times base salary; and for our Vice Presidents, the multiple is one times base salary. We expect our executive officers to retain 75% of the shares of common stock (net of taxes) awarded under our long-term incentive plans until they achieve their applicable ownership levels, and they are expected to maintain such levels thereafter.

Tax Considerations

We are not allowed a deduction under Section 162(m) of the Code for any compensation paid to a “covered employee” in excess of $1.0 million per year, subject to certain exceptions. In general, “covered employees” include our President and chief executive officer and our three other most highly compensated executive officers (not including our chief financial officer) who are in our employ and are officers at the end of the tax year. Among other exceptions, the deduction limit does not apply to compensation

-48-


that meets the specified requirements under Section 162(m) of the Code for “performance-based compensation.” In general, those

-52-


requirements include the establishment of objective performance goals for the payment of such compensation by a committee of the board of directors composed solely of two or more outside directors, stockholder approval of the material terms of such compensation prior to payment, and certification by the committee that the performance goals have been achieved prior to the payment of such compensation. Such requirements permit the committee administering the plan to make discretionary adjustments to performance goals that would reduce payouts but do not permit discretionary adjustments to performance goals that would increase payouts.

Although theThe Compensation Committee believes that establishing appropriate compensation arrangements to retain and incent our executive officers best serves our interests and the interests of our stockholders,stockholders. In order to maintain flexibility to compensate our executive officers in a manner designed to promote long-term corporate goals and objectives, the Compensation Committee has not adopted a policy that all executive compensation must be deductible. However, the Compensation Committee also believes that, when appropriate, consideration should be given to seeking to maximize the deductibility of the compensation paid to our executive officers.

The 2010 MIP permits the Compensation Committee to grant awards that are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code, (“qualifying awards”)or “qualifying awards,” and awards that are not intended to qualify as “performance-based” compensation, (“non-qualifying awards”).or “non-qualifying awards.” Consistent with the 2010 MIP and the Compensation Committee’s consideration and balancing of its executive compensation objectives, the amounts identified under the Stock Awards and Non-Equity Incentive Plan columncolumns of the Summary Compensation Table on page 5054 paid to Messrs. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple and Gorham for 2012,2015 and 2014 and to Messrs. Hicks, Brandon and GorhamDalrymple for 2011 and for all Named Executive Officers for 20102013 are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code.Code, except for the restricted stock units awarded to Mr. Dalrymple in 2015 and 2014. The amounts reflected in such column for Messrs. Dalrymple and Borrelli for 2011, as well as the cash bonusesbonus paid to Mr. BorrelliSennott for 2011 and to Mr. Dalrymple for 20102013 identified under the Bonus columnColumn of the Summary Compensation Table dodoes not qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m). All ofMr. Sennott’s compensation reflected in the performance shares awardedSummary Compensation Table for 2015 and 2014 does not have to the Named Executive Officers,qualify as well as restricted stock awards to such officers, under the 2002 LTIP, the 2007 LTIP and 2012 LTIP are intended to quality as “performance-based” compensation“performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code.Code because a person serving as our chief financial officer at the end of a given year is not a “covered” employee for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code for such year.

Compensation Policies and Practices Relating to Risk Management

Risk analysis has always been part of our design and review of our group-wide executive incentive plans, and the Compensation Committee regularly monitors compensation policies, practices and outstanding awards to determine whether our risk management and incentive objectives are being met with respect to group-wide employee incentives. Our material risks include investment risk (debt and equity), as well as catastrophe losses and material mispricing of risk at our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries. The Board’s and management’s risk oversight is discussed on page 16. The Compensation Committee does not believe that risks arising from our group-wide compensation policies and practices for our employees are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Alleghany. In this regard, as discussed on pages 37 and 38, our short and long-term incentive plans are capped at individual levels so as not to incent imprudent risk taking to achieve outsized payouts. In addition, our officers are required to own a substantial amount of common stock to ensure that they maintain a significant stake in our long-term success, and we have in place a compensation clawback policy applicable to our officers to further discourage imprudent risk taking. Further, we do not grant stock options to officers as we do not wish to reward or punish them for exogenous short-term market price movements. The management teams of our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are incented to write profitable business and have no incentives to grow premium volume by underpricing risk. The Compensation Committee seeks to set realistic incentive goals, monitors them in light of economic conditions and our strategy and risk appetite, and will consider appropriate adjustments in respect thereof in the event of any conflict between incentives and the Board’s strategy and risk appetite.

 

-49--53-


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information under this heading relates to the compensation of Alleghany’sour Named Executive Officers during 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010.2013.

Summary Compensation Table

 

Name and

Principal Position

 Year  Salary  Bonus(1)  Stock
Awards(2)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
(3)
  Change in Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(4)
  All Other
Compen-
sation(5)
  Total 

Weston M. Hicks,

  2012   $1,250,000       $2,514,334   $2,062,500   $1,259,316   $245,581   $7,331,731  

President and CEO

  2011   $1,000,000       $2,006,415   $2,150,000   $1,922,260   $268,182   $7,346,857  
  2010   $1,000,000       $1,976,413   $1,650,000   $821,990   $188,066   $5,636,469  

Joseph P. Brandon

  2012   $821,970(7)      $10,521,105   $1,200,000   $338,632   $4,174,312   $17,056,019  

EVP(6)

        

Christopher K. Dalrymple,

  2012   $450,000       $543,192   $438,750   $229,931   $119,780   $1,781,653  

SVP, General Counsel

  2011   $380,000       $228,804   $370,500   $331,084   $123,238   $1,433,626  

and Secretary

  2010   $320,000   $115,200   $189,766   $192,000   $161,760   $68,476   $1,047,202  

Roger B. Gorham,

  2012   $550,000       $663,997   $536,250   $237,544   $144,586   $2,132,377  

SVP-Finance

  2011   $550,000       $662,151   $536,250   $359,561   $157,775   $2,265,737  

and Investments

  2010   $530,000       $628,431   $516,750   $462,259   $106,646   $2,244,086  

and CFO

        

Jerry G. Borrelli,

  2012   $390,000       $235,326   $234,000   $149,806   $111,622   $1,120,754  

VP and CAO

  2011   $370,000   $100,000   $222,662   $222,000   $218,112   $116,579   $1,249,353  
  2010   $360,000       $213,419   $216,000   $140,727   $77,658   $1,007,804  

Name and

Principal Position

 Year  Salary  Bonus(1)  Stock
Awards(2)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(3)
  Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(4)
  All Other
Compensation(5)
  Total 

Weston M. Hicks

  2015   $1,000,000       $4,026,509   $1,700,000       $166,176   $6,892,685  

President and chief

executive officer

  2014    1,000,000        3,959,904    2,500,000   $2,914,467    168,675    10,543,046  
  2013    1,250,000        3,983,966    2,000,000        213,759    7,447,725  

Joseph P. Brandon

  2015    800,000        2,415,815    1,620,000        132,716    4,968,531  

Executive Vice President

  2014    800,000        2,376,099    1,600,000    254,392    135,071    5,165,562  
  2013    1,000,000        2,124,755    1,200,000    337,805    167,907    4,830,467  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

  2015    630,000        951,133    614,250        103,890    2,299,273  

Senior Vice President,

General Counsel, and Secretary

  2014    600,000        890,402    600,000    702,363    100,232    2,892,997  
  2013    550,000        876,778    550,000    29,707    92,347    2,098,832  

Roger B. Gorham

  2015    600,000        271,557    270,000    256,464    100,572    1,498,593  

Senior Vice President-

Head of Fixed

Income and Treasurer

  2014    600,000        237,258    240,000    373,171    101,692    1,552,121  
  2013    600,000        233,642    220,000        101,542    1,155,184  
           

John L. Sennott, Jr.

  2015    630,000        951,133    614,250        104,422    2,299,805  

Senior Vice President and

chief financial officer

  2014    600,000        890,402    600,000        100,691    2,191,093  
  2013    389,583(6)  $180,000    1,357,448    550,000        65,971    2,543,002  

 

(1)Reflects (i) a cash bonus paid to Mr. Borrelli for 2011 in recognitionSennott upon commencement of his superior performance and increased workload in connectionemployment with Alleghany’s acquisition of Transatlantic and (ii) a cash bonus paid to Mr. Dalrymple for 2010 in recognition of his assumption of increased responsibilities.Alleghany.

 

(2)Represents the grant date fair value of performance shares granted to the Named Executive Officers listed below under the 20072012 LTIP, and computed in accordance with ASC 718. For information on the valuation assumptions used in these computations, see Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report onthe Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.10-K. The grant date fair value of such performance shares, assuming payouts at maximum, is as follows:

 

Name

  2012   2011   2010   2015   2014   2013 

Mr. Hicks

  $3,771,502    $3,009,622    $2,964,619    $6,039,764    $5,939,856    $5,975,949  

Mr. Brandon

   3,623,722     3,564,148     3,187,137  

Mr. Dalrymple

  $814,788    $343,207    $284,649     951,133     890,597     876,423  

Mr. Gorham

  $995,995    $993,226    $942,647     407,336     355,887     350,463  

Mr. Borrelli

  $352,989    $333,993    $320,129  

Mr. Sennott

   951,133     890,597     2,036,173  

For Mr. Dalrymple, the amounts in this column also include the grant date fair value of restricted stock units awarded to him under the 2012 LTIP as follows:

Year

  Restricted Stock Units(#)   Grant Date Fair Value($) 

2015

   697    $317,044  

2014

   759     296,670  

2013

   825     292,496  

 

-50--54-


    For Mr. Brandon, representsSennott, the amounts in this column also include the grant date fair value as computed in accordance with ASC 718, of (i) 12,403restricted stock units and performance shares granted to him under the 2007 LTIP for all outstanding award periods (as described on pages 53 and 54), with a grant date fair value of $4,007,409 assuming payouts at maximum, (ii) 11,137 shares of fully-vested, non-forfeitable restricted common stock awarded to him under the 20072012 LTIP pursuant to a success shares award agreement (the terms of which are described in more detail on page 57), with a grant date fair value of $3,598,365, and (iii) 9,023 restricted stock units granted to him under the 2007 LTIP pursuant to a restricted stock unit matching agreement (the terms of which are described in more detail on page 58), with a grant date fair value of $2,915,331.as follows:

Year

  Restricted Stock Units(#)   Performance Shares(#)   Grant Date Fair Value($) 

2015

   697         $317,044  

2014

   759          296,670  

2013

     3,540     2,036,173  

 

(3)Represents cash incentive earned in respect of 2012 and 2011 pursuant to awards under the 2010 MIP and in respect of 2010 pursuant to awards under the 2005 MIP. For Mr. Hicks, this amount also includes his cash award of $500,000 in February 2012 in respect of 2011 performance under the ACP Incentive Program. This program provided cash incentives to select officers of Alleghany and the investment personnel of our subsidiary Alleghany Capital Partners LLC to the extent the performance of a designated portfolio of public equities and cash investments exceeded the performance that would have been achieved if the designated portfolio had a total return equal to the Total Return of the S&P 500. The ACP Incentive Program was discontinued in January 2012, with no further payouts made to any participant, including Mr. Hicks.

 

(4)Reflects change in actuarial present value of pension benefits during 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010.2013. For Mr. Sennott, reflects that he is not a participant in the Retirement Plan. The actual change in pension value was negative for Messrs. Hicks, Brandon and Dalrymple in 2015, and for Mr. Hicks and Mr. Gorham in 2013. However, SEC regulations do not allow for inclusion of negative pension amounts in the Summary Compensation Table. Change in actuarial present value of pension benefits is subject to many external variables, such as interest rates, that are not related to Alleghany performance. Therefore, we do not believe a year-over-year change in actuarial pension value is helpful in evaluating compensation for comparative purposes, and believe that stockholders may find the detailed explanation of changes in actuarial pension value for Messrs. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple and Gorham under “Change in Pension Value” on pages 58 and 59 and the discussion of accumulated pension benefits under “Pension Benefits” on pages 65 through 67 to be useful for an understanding of the pension benefits provided to the Named Executive Officers.

 

(5)All Other Compensation amounts reflect the following items:

 

Name

 Year  Post-Retirement
Medical Plan(a)
  Life Insurance and
Long Term-
Disability(b)
  Tax
Reimbursement(c)
  Savings
Benefit(d)
  Success Fee
Arrangement(e)
  Consulting
Arrangement(f)
  Total 

Weston M. Hicks

  2012   $35,218   $13,320   $11,105   $185,938           $245,581  
  2011   $98,526   $10,700   $8,956   $150,000           $268,182  
  2010   $19,930   $10,620   $7,516   $150,000           $188,066  

Joseph P. Brandon

  2012   $146,033   $6,437   $4,797   $117,045   $3,500,000   $400,000   $4,174,312  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

  2012   $43,031   $5,550   $4,136   $67,063           $119,780  
  2011   $57,459   $5,236   $3,918   $56,625           $123,238  
  2010   $12,098   $4,908   $3,595   $47,875           $68,476  

Roger B. Gorham

  2012   $50,539   $6,616   $4,931   $82,500           $144,586  
  2011   $64,141   $6,440   $4,819   $82,375           $157,775  
  2010   $16,398   $6,204   $4,544   $79,500           $106,646  

Jerry G. Borrelli

  2012   $43,617   $5,518   $4,112   $58,375           $111,622  
  2011   $51,784   $5,352   $4,005   $55,438           $116,579  
  2010   $14,694   $5,210   $3,816   $53,938           $77,658  

-51-


(a)Amounts represent the change in Post-Retirement Medical Plan benefit value during each of the years presented.

Name

  Year   Life Insurance and
Long-Term
Disability(a)
   Tax
Reimbursement(b)
   Savings
Benefit(c)
   Total 

Weston M. Hicks

   2015    $8,035    $8,141    $150,000    $166,176  
   2014     8,500     8,612     151,563     168,675  
   2013     14,320     11,939     187,500     213,759  

Joseph P. Brandon

   2015     6,643     6,073     120,000     132,716  
   2014     7,220     6,601     121,250     135,071  
   2013     10,260     7,647     150,000     167,907  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

   2015     5,003     4,574     94,313     103,890  
   2014     5,508     5,036     89,688     100,232  
   2013     6,000     4,472     81,875     92,347  

Roger B. Gorham

   2015     5,523     5,049     90,000     100,572  
   2014     6,108     5,584     90,000     101,692  
   2013     6,792     5,062     89,688     101,542  

John L. Sennott, Jr

   2015     5,281     4,828     94,313     104,422  
   2014     5,748     5,255     89,688     100,691  
   2013     6,286     4,685     55,000     65,971  

 

 (b)(a)Amounts represent the dollar value of the insurance premiums paid by Alleghany for the benefit of such individuals for life insurance and long-term disability insurance maintained by Alleghany on their behalf in each of the years presented. These life insurance policies provide a death benefit to each such officer if he is an employee at the time of his death equal to four times the amount of his annual salary at January 1 of the year of his death. These long-term disability insurance policies provide disability insurance coverage to each such officer in the event he becomes disabled (as defined in such policies) during his employment with Alleghany.

 

 (c)(b)Amounts represent the reimbursement of taxes, and the reimbursement itself, on income imputed to such individuals pursuant to Alleghany’s life insurance and long-term disability policies as described above in each of the years presented.

 

-55-


 (d)(c)Reflects savings benefitsbenefit amounts credited by Alleghany pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan in each of the years presented. The method for calculating earnings on the savings benefit amounts under the Deferred Compensation Plan is set out on pages 6563 and 6664 in the narrative accompanying the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table.

 

(e)Reflects the cash portion of a payout made to Mr. Brandon pursuant to a success shares award agreement (the terms of which are described in more detail on page 57).

(f)Reflects cash compensation received by Mr. Brandon for the consulting services provided to Alleghany from January 1, 2012 to March 6, 2012 pursuant to a consulting arrangement entered into with Alleghany.

(6)Joseph P. Brandon was named an Executive Vice President of Alleghany on March 6, 2012, upon the closing of the acquisition of Transatlantic. During the period from September 15, 2011 through the closing date, Mr. Brandon was engaged by Alleghany as a consultant.

(7)Represents pro rata portion of 20122013 annual base salary of $1,000,000,$550,000, reflecting Mr. Brandon’sSennott’s commencement of employment with Alleghany in March 2012.April 2013.

 

-52--56-


Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 20122015

 

Name

 Grant Date Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(1)
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(2)
 All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of

Stock or
Units (#)
  Grant Date
Fair Value

of Stock
Awards(3)
  Grant Date  Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(1)
 

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2)

 All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Share of
Stock or
Units(#)(3)
  Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
Awards(4)
 
 Threshold
($)
 Target
($)
 Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
   Target($) Maximum($) Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
 

Weston M. Hicks

 January 17, 2012 $1,100,000   $1,375,000   $2,062,500    2,641    8,804    13,206       $2,514,334    1/20/15    1,700,000    2,550,000       
  2/03/15      4,426    8,852    13,278       $4,026,509  

Joseph P. Brandon

 March 6, 2012 $640,000   $800,000   $1,200,000    1,488    4,961    7,442       $1,602,899    1/20/15    1,080,000    1,620,000          
 March 6, 2012(4)              1,116    3,721    5,581       $1,202,255    2/03/15      2,655    5,311    7,967        2,415,815  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

  1/20/15    409,500    614,250       
 March 6, 2012(4)              744    2,481    3,721       $801,611    2/03/15      697    1,394    2,091        634,089  
 March 6, 2012(4)              372    1,240    1,860       $400,644    2/03/15                  697    317,044  

Roger B. Gorham

  1/20/15    180,000    270,000       
  2/03/15      298    597    896        271,557  

John L. Sennott, Jr.

  1/20/15    409,500    614,250       
 March 6, 2012(5)                          11,137   $3,598,365    2/03/15      697    1,394    2,091        634,089  
 March 6, 2012(6)                          9,023   $2,915,331    2/03/15                  697    317,044  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

 January 17, 2012 $234,000   $292,500   $438,750    571    1,902    2,853       $543,192  

Roger B. Gorham

 January 17, 2012 $286,000   $357,500   $536,250    698    2,325    3,488       $663,997  

Jerry G. Borrelli

 January 17, 2012 $124,800   $156,000   $234,000    247    824    1,236       $235,326  

 

(1)Reflects awards under the 2010 MIP. Under the award opportunity granted on January 17, 2012 toFor Messrs. Brandon, Hicks, Dalrymple, and Gorham and granted on March 6, 2012 to Mr. Brandon, threshold amounts reflect estimated possible payout if Adjusted Earnings Per Share equal 81% of Target Plan Earnings Per ShareSennott, target and maximum amounts reflect estimated possible payout if Adjusted Earnings Per Share equal 110% of Target Plan Earnings Per Share. If Adjusted Earnings Per Share is 80% or below of Target Plan Earnings Per Share, no payment would be made. For Mr. Borrelli, threshold, target and maximum amount reflects the range of awardawards that heeach such Named Executive Officer could have earned based upon Alleghany achieving a specified financial performance objective, subject to reduction in respect of Alleghany performance and/or individual performance. These amounts are subject to decrease (but not increase) at the discretion of the Compensation Committee based upon its evaluation of Alleghany’s overall financial and operational performance and their individual performance.

 

(2)Reflects the gross number of shares of common stock payable in connection with awards of performance shares for the 2012-20152015-2018 award period granted under the 2007 LTIP and additional performance share awards made to Mr. Brandon as discussed in Note (4) below.2012 LTIP. Threshold amounts reflect estimated future payout of performance shares if average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share (as defined by the Compensation Committee pursuant to the 2012 LTIP) equals 3.5%5% in the award period; target amounts reflect estimated future payout of performance shares if average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share equals 6%7% in the award period; and maximum amounts reflect estimated future payout of performance shares if average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share equals or exceeds 8.5%9% in the award period (each as adjusted as described above).period. If average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share is less than 3.5%5%, none of these performance shares would be payable. The determination of average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share for purposes of determining payouts of these awards is subject to adjustment for stock dividends and, provided that the average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share for the 2012-2015 award period, as adjusted for stock dividends, is positive, will also be adjusted to include the excess, if any, of such average annual compound growth over the Total Return on the S&P 500 Index (whether positive or negative and as calculated by Bloomberg Finance) for such period.

 

-53-


(3)Reflects the awards to each of Mr. Dalrymple and Mr. Sennott under the 2012 ASC 718LTIP of restricted stock units that cliff vest on the four-year anniversary of the grant date.

(4)Reflects the 2015 value of performance share awards for the 2012-20152015-2018 award period under the 20072012 LTIP for the Named Executive Officer, computed in accordance with ASC 718, assuming payouts at target and additional performance shares of restricted common stock or restricted stock units and restricted stock awardsawarded to Mr. Brandon awarded in connection with his commencement of employment with Alleghany as discussed in Notes (4), (5) and (6) below.

(4)Reflect performance share awards made to Mr. Brandon under the 2007 LTIP in connection with his commencement of employment at Alleghany in March 2012 as follows: (i) 3,721 performance shares for the three-year award period ending December 31, 2014, (ii) 2,481 performance shares for the two-year award period ending December 31, 2013, and (iii) 1,240 performance shares for the one-year award period ending December 31, 2012, subject to achievement of the same performance objectives for such award periods as applicable to the other Named Executive Officers.

(5)Reflects award under the 2007 LTIP of 11,137 fully vested and non-forfeitable shares of common stock pursuant to a success shares award agreement. These shares are subject to restrictions upon transfer until the earliest to occur of (i) March 6, 2015, (ii) Mr. Brandon’s termination of employment for any reason or (iii) a merger approved by the Board effectuated by a tender offer or other major corporate transaction approved by the Board with respect to Alleghany’s common stock.

(6)Reflects award under the 2007 LTIP of 9,023 restricted stock units under a restricted stock unit matching grant agreement that vest over a seven-year period, with 15% of the restricted stock units vesting on each of the first six anniversaries of the date of grantMr. Dalrymple and 10% of the restricted stock units vesting on the seventh anniversary of the date of grant, subject to holding requirements as described in more detail on page 58.Mr. Sennott.

-57-


Narrative Discussion Relating to the Summary Compensation Table and

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

Change in Pension Value

Effective December 31, 2013, Alleghany’s Retirement Plan was closed to new participants and was “frozen” for existing participants so that no additional benefits would accrue after such date. Despite the freezing of the Retirement Plan, the Summary Compensation Table on page 54 may still show an increase or decrease in the value of our Named Executive Officers’ pension benefits. These changes in value are primarily driven by external variables, such as the discount rate, the mortality tables used and the passage of time. Set out below is a table showing the components of the change in pension value for years 2013-2015 for our Named Executive Officers who are participants in the Retirement Plan.

Name

  Year   (Increase)
Decrease in
Discount

Rate(1)
  Change in
Mortality
Table(2)
   Passage of
Time/Age
Increase(3)
   Value of
Benefits
Accrued
During the
Year(4)
   Total Change
in Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(5)
 

Weston M. Hicks

   2015    $(478,042      $454,163         $(23,879
   2014     1,629,691   $862,795     421,981          2,914,467  
   2013     (1,618,668       386,857          (1,231,811

Joseph P. Brandon

   2015     (43,777       37,233          (6,544
   2014     146,869    73,701     33,822          254,392  
   2013     (146,523       13,545    $470,783     337,805  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

   2015     (140,953       81,866          (59,087
   2014     445,079    190,070     67,214          702,363  
   2013     (438,285       52,583     415,409     29,707  

Roger B. Gorham

   2015     (69,311  231,910     93,865          256,464  
   2014     274,499         98,672          373,171  
   2013     (282,916       86,783          (196,133

(1)For 2015, the discount rate used was 4.25%; for 2014, the discount rate used was 4%; and for 2013 the discount rate used was 5%.

(2)For the Retirement Plan year ending in 2013, Alleghany elected to use a mortality assumption based on tables prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service for funding purposes. For the Retirement Plan year ending in 2014, Alleghany elected to change the mortality assumption to the RP 2014 base table with Scale MP -2014, which reflect updated mortality tables issued by the Society of Actuaries in October 2014. For the Retirement Plan year ending in 2015, Alleghany amended the Plan to adjust this mortality basis used to compute the present values for lump sums to the RP-2014 Annuitant male/female (50/50) blended basis mortality table using Scale MP-2014 with generational projection.

(3)Represents the change attributable to passage of time and increase in participant’s age.

(4)Amounts for each of Mr. Brandon and Mr. Dalrymple reflect additional accruals as their projected full service benefit in the applicable Retirement Plan year was greater than the retirement benefit accrued by him at December 13, 2010 when the Compensation Committee amended the Retirement Plan by eliminating the inclusion of annual cash bonuses earned for years subsequent to 2010 in the computation of benefits. For additional detail in this regard, see pages 65 through 67.

(5)Calculated in accordance with SEC rules governing preparation of the Summary Compensation Table on page 54 except for Mr. Hicks and Mr. Gorham in 2013 and Mr. Hicks, Mr. Brandon and Mr. Dalrymple in 2015, as SEC rules do not allow for inclusion of negative pension amounts in the Summary Compensation Table.

-58-


In order to show the effect that the year-over-year change in pension value had on total compensation, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 54, and as determined under applicable SEC rules, the table below presents SEC total compensation and then SEC total compensation without pension value changes for the Named Executive Officers who are participants in the Retirement Plan. The amounts reported in the SEC total without pension value changes are calculated by subtracting the change in pension value reported in the Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings columns (but including the nonqualified deferred compensation earnings reported in that column, if any) from the amounts reported in the SEC Total column. The amounts reported in this column may differ substantially from, and are not a substitute for, the amounts reported in the SEC Total column in the Summary Compensation Table on page 54.

Name

  Year   SEC Total
Compensation
   SEC Total
Compensation
without
Change in
Pension Value
 

Mr. Hicks

   2015    $6,892,685    $6,892,685  
   2014     10,543,046     7,628,579  
   2013     7,447,725     7,447,225  

Mr. Brandon

   2015     4,968,531     4,968,531  
   2014     5,165,562     4,911,170  
   2013     4,830,467     4,492,662  

Mr. Dalrymple

   2015     2,299,273     2,299,273  
   2014     2,892,997     2,190,634  
   2013     2,098,832     2,069,125  

Mr. Gorham

   2015     1,498,593     1,242,129  
   2014     1,551,121     1,177,950  
   2013     1,155,184     1,155,184  

Employment Agreement with Weston M. Hicks

On October 7, 2002, Alleghany and Mr. Hicks entered into an employment agreement pursuant to which Mr. Hicks agreed to serve as Executive Vice President of Alleghany. Pursuant to the terms of this employment agreement:

agreement, Mr. Hicks’Hicks’s salary is to be reviewed annually.

If In addition, if Mr. Hicks’Hicks’s employment is terminated by Alleghany other than for “Cause” or other than in the case of his “Total Disability,” Alleghany will continue to pay his base salary

-54-


in accordance with Alleghany’s regular payroll practices after such termination until such payments aggregate $1,000,000 on a gross basis. “Cause” is defined as conviction of a felony; willful failure to implement reasonable directives of the Chairman or the Board of Alleghany after written notice, which failure is not corrected within ten days following notice thereof; or gross misconduct in connection with the performance of any of Mr. Hicks’ duties; and “Total Disability” is defined as Mr. Hicks’ inability to discharge his duties due to physical or mental illness or accident for one or more periods totaling six months during any consecutive twelve-month period.

Mr. Hicks and Alleghany entered into a restricted stock unit matching grant agreement dated as of October 7, 2002, whereby Mr. Hicks received a restricted stock unit matching grant under the 2002 LTIP of two restricted stock units for every share of common stock Mr. Hicks purchased or received pursuant to stock dividends on those purchased shares, or “Owned Shares,” on or before September 30, 2003 up to a maximum of 30,000 restricted stock units in respect of up to a maximum of 15,000 Owned Shares (in each case subject to increase to reflect any stock dividend paid in 2003). Material terms of this matching grant agreement, or the “Matching Grant Agreement,” are discussed below. On August 25, 2003, Mr. Hicks purchased 10,000 shares of common stock and Alleghany credited himBoard after written notice, which failure is not corrected within ten days following notice thereof; or gross misconduct in connection with 23,433 restricted stock units (as adjusted for stock dividends). All of the restricted stock units vested on October 7, 2012 and were paid out in shares of common stock.

Mr. Hicks received a grant of 29,877 performance-based restricted shares of common stock (which includes shares received in subsequent stock dividends which were similarly restricted) under the 2002 LTIP upon his election as chief executive officer of Alleghany. Material terms of this restricted stock agreement are discussed on page 56. On February 21, 2013, the Compensation Committee determined that the performance goalof any of Mr. Hicks’s duties. “Total Disability” is defined as Mr. Hicks’s inability to discharge his duties due to physical or mental illness or accident for such award had been achieved as of December 31, 2012 and as a result, the restricted stock award of 29,877 shares vested and were paid out in shares of common stock in February 2013.

one or more periods totaling six months during any consecutive twelve-month period. The employment agreement was the result of an arm’s-length negotiation between the Executive Committee of the Board and Mr. Hicks and was approved by the Compensation Committee and the Board. The Executive Committee determined that such provisions were appropriate and helpful in recruiting Mr. Hicks, and the Compensation Committee and the Board approved such determination.

-55-


2002 Restricted Stock Unit Matching Grant Award to Mr. Hicks

On August 25, 2003, Mr. Hicks purchased 10,000 shares of common stock and, pursuant to the Matching Grant Agreement, Alleghany credited him with 23,433 restricted stock units, as adjusted for stock dividends. These restricted stock units were notional units of measurement denominated in shares of common stock and entitled Mr. Hicks to payment on account of such restricted stock units in an amount equal to the Fair Market Value, as defined in the Matching Grant Agreement, on the payment date of a number of shares of common stock equal to the number of restricted stock units to which Mr. Hicks was entitled to payment. Mr. Hicks was required to maintain unencumbered beneficial ownership of the Owned Shares continuously throughout the period commencing with the initial purchase of Owned Shares and ending October 7, 2012. To the extent he had failed to do so, he would have forfeited two restricted stock units for each Owned Share with respect to which he had not maintained unencumbered beneficial ownership for the required period of time. All of the restricted stock units vested on October 7, 2012 and were paid out in shares of common stock.

2004 Restricted Stock Award to Mr. Hicks

Upon his appointment as President and chief executive officer of Alleghany on December 31, 2004, Mr. Hicks received 29,877 shares of restricted common stock (as adjusted for stock dividends paid since the date of his employment agreement) awarded as a challenge grant under the 2002 LTIP as set forth in a restricted stock award agreement dated as of December 31, 2004 between Mr. Hicks and Alleghany. Such shares of restricted stock were to vest:

if Alleghany achieved average annual compound growth in Stockholders’ Equity Per Share (as defined in the award agreement) equal to 10% or more as measured over a calendar year period commencing January 1, 2005 and ending on December 31, 2008, 2009, 2010 or 2011; or

if the performance goal set forth in clause (i) above has not been achieved as of December 31, 2011, when Alleghany achieved average annual compound growth in Stockholders’ Equity Per Share equal to 7% or more as measured over a calendar year period commencing January 1, 2005 and ending on December 31, 2012, 2013 or 2014.

On February 21, 2013, the Compensation Committee determined that average annual growth in Stockholders’ Equity Per Share for the period January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2012 exceeded 7% and as a result, the restricted stock award of 29,877 shares vested and were paid out in shares of common stock in February 2013.

-56-


Employment Agreement with Joseph P. Brandon

On November 20, 2011, Alleghany and Mr. Brandon entered into an employment agreement which became effective on March 6, 2012 upon the closing of the TransatlanticTransRe acquisition, under which Mr. Brandon agreed to serve as Executive Vice President of Alleghany. Pursuant to the terms of this employment agreement:

 

Mr. Brandon’s salary is to be reviewed annually for increases but shall not be decreased.

 

-59-


If Mr. Brandon’s employment is terminated by Alleghany other than for “Cause” or other than in the case of his “Total Disability,” Alleghany will continue to pay his base salary in accordance with Alleghany’s regular payroll practices after such termination until such payments aggregate $1,000,000 on a gross basis. “Cause” is defined as conviction of a felony; willful failure to implement reasonable directives of Alleghany’s chief executive officer after written notice, which failure is not corrected within ten days following notice thereof; or willful gross misconduct in connection with the performance of any of Mr. Brandon’s duties; andduties. “Total Disability” is defined as Mr. Brandon’s inability to discharge his duties due to physical or mental illness or accident for one or more periods totaling six months during any consecutive twelve-month period.

 

Mr. Brandon and Alleghany entered into a restricted stock unit matching grant agreement dated as of March 6, 2012, whereby Mr. Brandon was to receive a restricted stock unit matching grant under the 2007 LTIP of one restricted stock unit for every share of common stock Mr. Brandon purchased or received pursuant to stock dividends on those purchased shares, or “JPB Owned Shares,” on or before September 3, 2012 up to a maximum of $5.0 million worth of common stock. Material terms of this matching grant agreement, or the “JPB Matching Grant Agreement,” are discussed below.

 

Mr. Brandon and Alleghany entered into a success shares award agreement dated as of March 6, 2012, pursuant to which Mr. Brandon received an award (i) under the 2007 LTIP of 11,137 fully vested and non-forfeitable shares of common stock and (ii) a lump sum cash payment in the amount of $3.5 million. TheseThe transfer restrictions applicable to these shares are subject to restrictions upon transfer until the earliest to occur of (i)lapsed on March 6, 2015, (ii) Mr. Brandon’s termination of employment for any reason or (iii) a merger approved by the Board effectuated by a tender offer or other major corporate transaction approved by the Board with respect to Alleghany’s common stock.2015.

The employment agreement was the result of an arm’s-length negotiation between the Board and Mr. Brandon and was approved by the Compensation Committee and the Board. The Board determined that such provisions were appropriate and helpful in recruiting Mr. Brandon and completing the TransatlanticTransRe acquisition.

-57-


2012 Restricted Stock Unit Matching Grant Award to Mr. Brandon

Between March 6, 2012 and September 3, 2012, Mr. Brandon purchased 9,023 shares of common stock and, pursuant to the JPB Matching Grant Agreement, Alleghany credited him with 9,023 restricted stock units. These restricted stock units are notional units of measurement denominated in shares of common stock and entitle Mr. Brandon to payment on account of such restricted stock units in an amount equal to the Fair Market Value, as defined in the JPB Matching Grant Agreement, on the payment date of a number of shares of common stock equal to the number of restricted stock units to which Mr. Brandon is entitled to payment.

Pursuant to the terms of the JPB Matching Grant Agreement, the restricted stock units vest over a seven-year period, with 15% of the restricted stock units vesting on each of the first six anniversaries of the date of grant and 10% of the restricted stock units vesting on the seventh anniversary of the date of grant. The restricted stock units are to be paid in cash and/or shares of common stock, as the Compensation Committee may determine within ten business days of the applicable vesting date. If Mr. Brandon is terminated without Cause or by reason of his death or Total Disability (as such terms are defined in the JPB Matching Grant Agreement), the restricted stock units scheduled to vest during such year shall vest on a pro rata basis for the amount of time Mr. Brandon was employed during such year. If Mr. Brandon voluntarily terminates his employment or Alleghany terminates his employment for Cause, all unvested restricted units shall be forfeited. Mr. Brandon has no voting or other rights in respect of the restricted stock units.

Mr. Brandon must maintain unencumbered beneficial ownership of the JPB Owned Shares continuously throughout the period commencing with the initial purchase of JPB Owned Shares and ending on the earliest to occur of (i) March 6, 2019, (ii) Mr. Brandon’s termination of employment for any reason or (iii) a merger approved by the Board effectuated by a tender offer or other major corporate transaction approved by the Board with respect to Alleghany’s common stock. To the extent Mr. Brandon fails to do so, he will forfeit one restricted stock unit for each JPB Owned Share with respect to which he has not maintained unencumbered beneficial ownership for the required period of time.

 

-58--60-


2004 Restricted Stock Award to Mr. Gorham

In connection with commencing employment with Alleghany as Senior Vice President — Finance, Alleghany and Mr. Gorham entered into a restricted stock award agreement dated as of December 21, 2004. Under this agreement, Mr. Gorham received 4,095 shares of restricted common stock (as adjusted for stock dividends paid since the date of the agreement) awarded as a challenge grant under the 2002 LTIP, which were to vest:

if Alleghany achieves average annual compound growth in Stockholders’ Equity Per Share (as defined in the award agreement) equal to 10% or more as measured over a calendar year period commencing January 1, 2005 and ending on December 31, 2008, 2009, 2010 or 2011; or

if the performance goal set forth in clause (i) above has not been achieved as of December 31, 2011, when Alleghany achieves average annual compound growth in Stockholders’ Equity Per Share equal to 7% or more as measured over a calendar year period commencing January 1, 2005 and ending on December 31, 2012, 2013 or 2014.

On February 21, 2013, the Compensation Committee determined that average annual growth in Stockholders’ Equity Per Share for the period January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2012 exceeded 7% and as a result, the restricted stock award of 4,095 shares vested and were paid out in shares of common stock in February 2013.

Letter Agreement with Mr. Gorham

Effective February 21, 2013, Mr. Gorham and Alleghany entered into a letter agreement which provides for continued payments to Mr. Gorham of his base salary until such payments aggregate to $1.2 million on a gross basis, payable in accordance with Alleghany’s normal payroll and procedures, following termination of his employment other than for Cause or in the event of his death or Total Disability. “Cause” is defined as conviction of a felony;felony, willful failure to implement reasonable directives of Alleghany’s chief executive officer after written notice, which failure is not corrected within ten days following notice thereof;thereof, or willful gross misconduct in connection with the performance of any of Mr. Gorham’s duties; andduties. “Total Disability” is defined as Mr. Gorham’s inability to discharge his duties due to physical or mental illness or accident for one or more periods totaling six months during any consecutive twelve-month period.

 

-59--61-


Outstanding Equity Awards at 20122015 Fiscal Year-End

 

 Stock Awards   Stock Awards 

Name

 Number of
Shares or  Units
of Stock That
Have Not
Vested (#)
 Market Value of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not
Vested ($)
 Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Number of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested (#)
 Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested ($)
   Number of
Shares or Units

of Stock That
Have Not
Vested(#)
 Market Value of
Shares or Units

of Stock That
Have Not
Vested($)
   Equity Incentive
Plan  Awards: Number of
Unearned Shares,

Units or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested(#)
 Equity Incentive  Plan
Awards: Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested($)
 

Weston M. Hicks

          11,254(1)  $3,740,416              13,206(1)  $6,356,180  
          11,475(2)  $3,813,862              16,856(2)   8,112,721  
          9,995(3)  $3,322,101              15,197,(3)   7,314,227  
          13,206(4)  $4,389,146              13,278(4)   6,390,834  
          29,877(5)  $9,930,024  

Joseph P. Brandon

  9,023(6)  $2,998,884    1,860(1)  $618,190     4,962(5)  $2,388,573     7,442(1)   3,581,668  
          3,722(2)  $1,236,878              8,990(2)   4,326,736  
          5,582(3)  $1,855,067              9,119(3)   4,388,825  
          7,442(4)  $2,473,257              7,967(4)   3,834,356  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

          1,012(1)  $336,480              2,853(1)   1,373,177  
   825(6)   397,081     2,472(2)   1,189,798  
          1,102(2)  $366,189     759(6)   365,314     2,279(3)   1,096,665  
          1,140(3)  $378,841     697(6)   335,473     2,091(4)   1,006,419  
          2,853(4)  $948,223  

Roger B. Gorham

          3,578(1)  $1,189,317              3,488(1)   1,678,569  
          3,649(2)  $1,212,676              989(2)   475,775  
          3,299(3)  $1,096,349              911(3)   438,233  
          3,488(4)  $1,159,106              896(4)   431,013  
          4,095(7)  $1,361,036  

Jerry G. Borrelli

          1,181(1)  $392,560  

John L. Sennott, Jr.

            1,593(1)   766,727  
          1,239(2)  $411,833              2,124(2)   1,022,302  
          1,109(3)  $368,670     759(6)   365,314     2,279(3)   1,096,665  
          1,236(4)  $410,797     697(6)   335,473     2,091(4)   1,006,419  

 

(1)Performance shares granted under the 2007 LTIP calculated at maximum payout, which vest after completion of the award period ending December 31, 2012.

(2)Performance shares granted under the 2007(the 2012 LTIP calculated at maximum payout, which vest after completion of the award period ending December 31, 2013.

(3)Performance shares granted under the 2007 LTIP, calculated at maximum payout, which vest after completion of the award period ending December 31, 2014.

(4)Performance Shares granted under the 2007 LTIP,for Mr. Sennott), calculated at maximum payout, which vest after completion of the award period ending December 31, 2015.

 

-60-


(5)(2)Restricted stock awarded as a challenge grantPerformance shares granted under the 20022012 LTIP, calculated at maximum payout, which vestsvest after achievementcompletion of average annual compound growth in Stockholders’ Equity Per Share equal to 7% or more as measured over a calendar yearthe award period commencing on January 1, 2005 and ending on December 31, 2012, 2013 or 2014. On February 21, 2013, the Compensation Committee determined that the performance goal had been achieved as of December 31, 2012 and, as a result, the shares of restricted stock vested and were paid out in February 2013. The terms of this award are described in more detail on page 56.2016.

 

(6)(3)Performance shares granted under the 2012 LTIP, calculated at maximum payout, which vest after completion of the award period ending December 31, 2017.

(4)Performance Shares granted under the 2012 LTIP, calculated at maximum payout, which vest after completion of the award period ending December 31, 2018.

(5)Restricted stock units granted under the 2007 LTIP which vest over a seven year period, with 15% vesting on each of the first six anniversaries of date of grant and 10% vesting on the seventh anniversary of the date of grant. The terms of this award are described in more detail on page 58.60.

 

(7)(6)Restricted stock awardunit awards granted under the 20022012 LTIP which vested after achievementcliff vest on the fourth anniversary of average annual compound growth in Stockholders’ Equity Per Share equal to 7% or more as measured over a calendar year period commencing on January 1, 2005 and ending on December 31, 2012, 2013 or 2014. On February 21, 2013, the Compensation Committee determined that the performance goal had been achieved asdate of December 31, 2012 and, as a result, the shares of restricted stock vested and were paid out in February 2013. The terms of this award are described in more detail on page 59.grant.

-62-


20122015 Stock Vested

 

 Stock Awards(1)   Stock Awards(1) 

Name

 Number of Shares
Acquired  on Vesting
 Dollar Value
Realized on Vesting
   Number of  Shares
Acquired on Vesting
   Dollar Value
Realized  on Vesting
 

Weston M. Hicks(2)

  26,242   $9,069,237     9,996    $4,805,827  

Joseph P. Brandon(3)(2)

  11,137   $3,598,365     6,935     3,312,614  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

  236   $71,061     1,140     548,084  

Roger B. Gorham

  893   $268,887     3,299     1,586,077  

Jerry G. Borrelli

  287   $86,417  

John L. Sennott, Jr.

   1,062     510,583  

 

(1)

For each of Mr. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple, Gorham and Borrelli,Sennott, includes the gross amount of performance shares which vested upon certification of performance by the Compensation Committee on February 23, 201224, 2015 with respect to the award period ending December 31, 2011.2014. Payouts of such performance shares were made at 52.86%150% of target. The gross number of performance shares vested, and the form of payment, waswere as follows: Mr. Hicks, 2,8099,996 shares with a dollar value of $845,804$4,805,827 (paid entirely in cash); Mr. Dalrymple, 236Brandon, 5,582 shares with a dollar value of $71,061$2,683,686 (paid in the form of 1501,349 shares of common stock and $25,895$2,035,121 in cash).

-61-


; Mr. Gorham, 893Dalrymple, 1,140 shares with a dollar value of $268,887$548,084 (paid in the form of 570505 shares of common stock and $97,257$305,292 in cash); and Mr. Borrelli, 287Gorham, 3,299 shares with a dollar value of $86,417$1,586,077 (paid in cash); and Mr. Sennott, 1,062 shares with a dollar value of $510,583 (paid in the form of 38635 shares of common stock and $74,975$205,291 in cash). For Mr. Hicks, also includes the vesting of a restricted stock unit matching grant (see Note (2) below).

 

(2)Includes 23,4331,353 restricted stock units which vested on October 7, 2012September 2, 2015 pursuant to the JPB Matching Grant Agreement. The dollar value of such restricted stock units was $8,223,433 and was paid$628,928 (paid in the form of 11,641654 shares of common stock and $4,085,402$303,904 in cash.cash). The terms of this award are described in more detail on pages 55page 60.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

Name

  Executive
Contributions
in Last

Fiscal Year
   Registrant
Contributions
in Last

Fiscal Year(1)
   Aggregate
Earnings
in Last
Fiscal Year
(2)
   Aggregate
Withdrawals/

Distributions
  Aggregate
Balance at Last
Fiscal Year-End
 

Weston M. Hicks

       $150,000    $106,940    $(3,525 $2,780,352  

Joseph P. Brandon

        120,000     14,372     (2,819  528,321  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

        94,313     30,198     (2,217  896,487  

Roger B. Gorham

   115,000     90,000     33,940     (4,818  1,227,474  

John L. Sennott, Jr.

        94,313     5,280     (2,216  254,527  

(1)Such amounts are included as a component of “All Other Compensation” for 2015 set forth in the Summary Compensation Table on page 54 and 56.discussed in Note (5) to the Summary Compensation Table.

 

(3)(2)ReflectsAmounts represent interest earned on amounts credited to savings benefit accounts during 2015. Such amounts are not included in the payout of a success shares award on March 6, 2012 pursuant to the terms of Mr. Brandon’s employment agreement with Alleghany. The terms of such award are described in more detailSummary Compensation Table on page 57.54 as these amounts are not considered to be above-market interest.

The Deferred Compensation Plan, which was established in January 1982 and amended and restated in December 2014, provides for unfunded deferred compensation arrangements for Alleghany officers and certain other employees. The following descriptions of “Savings Benefit Provisions” and “Compensation Deferral Provisions” of the Deferred Compensation Plan generally apply to amounts that were earned and vested under the Deferred Compensation Plan after December 31, 2004. Amounts earned and vested before January 1, 2005, or the “Pre-409A Benefits,” are subject to less stringent requirements concerning the time of payment of benefits under the Deferred Compensation Plan, but the substantive provisions that apply to the Pre-409A Benefits are generally the same as described below.

-63-


Savings Benefit Provisions

All officers, including our Named Executive Officers, are eligible to participate in the Deferred Compensation Plan on the date of election or appointment as an officer of Alleghany.

Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, each calendar quarter, we credit a book reserve account for each officer who is a participant at any time during such quarter with an amount equal to 3.75% of the officer’s base annual salary. This quarterly credit results in an annual credit of 15% of a participant’s base annual salary, which we refer to as the “Savings Benefit Credit.” Each participant may elect to have those amounts either credited with:

interest at the prime rate (the “Prime Rate Alternative”);

treated as though invested in common stock (the “Common Stock Alternative”); or

increased or decreased by an amount proportionate to the growth or decline of Alleghany stockholders’ equity per share (the “Stockholders’ Equity Alternative”).

In general, payment of these amounts is made or commences on the date elected by the participant, which may not be later than 12 months following termination of employment, either in a lump sum or in installments as elected by the participant.

If a participant chooses the Prime Rate Alternative, that interest is computed from the date the Savings Benefit Credit is credited until the date that the amount is distributed to the participant or the date that the participant elects the Common Stock Alternative or the Stockholders’ Equity Alternative. The “prime rate” for purposes of the Deferred Compensation Plan means the rate of interest announced by JPMorgan Chase Bank as its prime rate at the close of the last business day of each month, which rate is deemed to remain in effect through the last business day of the next month.

Amounts treated as invested in common stock reflect the investment experience which the account would have had if the amounts had been invested, without commissions or other transaction expenses, and held in whole or fractional shares of common stock during the deferral period. These amounts are adjusted as appropriate to reflect cash and stock dividends, stock splits, and other similar distributions or transactions which, from time to time, occur with respect to common stock. Dividends and other distributions are automatically credited at their cash value or the fair market value of any non-cash dividend or other distribution and are deemed to purchase common stock on the date of payment thereof. Common stock is deemed acquired, and is valued for purposes of payout or transfer, at a price per share equal to the mean between the high and low prices thereof on the applicable date on the NYSE Consolidated Tape. A participant’s ability to elect to have his or her Savings Benefit Credit amounts treated as invested (or not invested) in our common stock is subject to compliance with applicable securities laws.

With respect to 2015, Mr. Hicks elected the Stockholders’ Equity Alternative to apply to his Savings Benefit Credit; Mr. Brandon and Mr. Gorham elected to have the Prime Rate Alternative apply to their Savings Benefit Credit; Mr. Sennott elected the Common Stock Alternative to apply to his Savings Benefit Credit; and Mr. Dalrymple elected to have the Stockholders’ Equity Alternative apply to 50% of his Savings Benefit Credit and to have the Prime Rate Alternative apply to 50% of his Savings Benefit Credit.

Compensation Deferral Provisions

The Deferred Compensation Plan provides that participants may elect to defer all or part of their base salary and annual incentive compensation each year other than compensation that would be paid in the form of common stock. Thus, currently, no long-term incentive compensation payable pursuant to the 2007 LTIP or 2012 LTIP may be deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan. Amounts deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan are credited with interest at the prime rate, unless a participant elects the Common Stock Alternative or the Stockholders’ Equity Alternative. A participant’s decision to have deferred amounts treated as invested (or not invested) in common stock is also subject to compliance with applicable securities laws.

-64-


Pension Benefits

 

Name

 

Plan Name

 Number of
Years of
Credited
Service
 Present Value
of  Accumulated
Benefit(1)
 Payments
During
Last
Fiscal Year
   

Plan Name

  Number of
Years of
Credited
Service
   Present Value of
Accumulated
Benefit(1)
 Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year
 

Weston M. Hicks

 Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan  10   $9,671,426        Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan   11    $11,330,203      

Joseph P. Brandon

 Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan  1   $338,632        Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan   2     924,285      

Christopher K. Dalrymple

 Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan  11   $1,314,580        Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan   12     1,987,563   ��  

Roger B. Gorham

 Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan  8   $2,169,582        Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan   9     2,603,084      

Jerry G. Borrelli

 Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan  6   $900,420      

John L. Sennott, Jr.

  Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan        (2)     

 

(1)Reflects the estimated present value of the retirement benefit accumulated under the Retirement Plan as of December 31, 20122015 by the Named Executive Officers, based in part on (i) their years of service as of such date, as indicated in the table, and (ii) the Named Executive Officers’ average compensation as of December 31, 20122013 as determined under the Retirement Plan, which was $2,425,000 for Mr. Hicks;Hicks, $1,000,000 for Mr. Brandon;Brandon, $995,075 for Mr. Gorham; $473,600Gorham and $459,167 for Mr. Dalrymple; and $549,400 for Mr. Borrelli.Dalrymple. The actuarial assumptions used to compute the present values are:for annuities are a discount rate of 4.00%4.25% and the RP-2014 Annuitants sex-distinct tables using Scale MP-2014 with generational projection. The actuarial assumptions used to compute the present values for lump sums are a discount rate of 4.25% for pre-retirement interest, a 30-year U.S. treasury rate of 4.00% for post-retirement interest and the 2013 Internal Revenue Service prescribedRP-2014 Annuitant male/female (50/50) blended basis mortality tables for the current valuation yeartable using Scale MP-2014 with separate tables for annuitants and non-annuitants.generational projection.

 

-62-


(2)Mr. Sennott commenced employment on April 16, 2013. In light of the expected amendment to the Retirement Plan which occurred in July 2013 and was effective December 31, 2013, the Board did not designate Mr. Sennott as a participant in the Retirement Plan.

The Retirement Plan provides retirement benefits for our employees who are elected officers and those who are designated as participants by the Board, including the Named Executive Officers. On July 16, 2013, the Board approved an amendment to the Retirement Plan effective December 31, 2013, whereby the Retirement Plan was closed to new participants and no additional benefit accruals would occur for existing participants after such date. Pursuant to this amendment, base compensation and future years of service are not taken into account when calculating a participant’s retirement benefits. However, future years of service with Alleghany by any participant who was not vested in his or her accrued benefit as of the freeze date will continue to have such service credited toward the Retirement Plan’s five-year vesting requirement. Furthermore, such future years of service will count towards early retirement eligibility and early retirement benefits determination for all participants. On November 17, 2015, the Board approved an amendment, or the “Plan Amendment,” to the Retirement Plan effective December 31, 2015. The retirementPlan Amendment provides for the automatic adjustment of the mortality table used to make certain calculations in the Retirement Plan, in order to reflect revised mortality projections determined by Alleghany in accordance with applicable accounting guidance.

Retirement benefits are paid, following termination of employment, in the form of an annuity for the joint lives of a participant and his or her spouse or, alternatively, actuarially equivalent forms of benefits, including a lump sum. Prior to January 1, 2011, the annual retirement benefit under the Retirement Plan, if paid in the form of a joint and survivor life annuity to a married participant who retires on reaching age 65 with 15 or more years of service, was equal to 67% of the participant’s highest average annual base salary and annual cash bonus over a consecutive three-year period during the last ten years or, if shorter, the full calendar years of employment. On December 13, 2010, pursuant to authority delegated by the Board, the Compensation Committee amended the Retirement Plan, effective January 1, 2011, by eliminating the inclusion of annual cash bonuses earned for years

-65-


subsequent to 2010 in the computation of benefits. As amended, the annual retirement benefit would be the greater of (i) the retirement benefit accrued by the participant at December 31, 2010, based upon eligibility for vesting and years of service credited at such date, pursuant to the benefit formula in effect at December 31, 2010, or (ii) a full service retirement benefit, if paid in the form of a joint and survivor annuity to a married participant who retires on reaching age 65 with 15 or morebased upon years of service credited at December 31, 2013, equal to 67% of the participant’s highest average annual base salary over a consecutive three-year period during the last ten years ending December 31, 2013 or, if shorter, the full calendar years of employment. The retirement benefit payable to a participant who retires on reaching age 65 with more than five but fewer than 15 years of service will equal the amount produced by the formula set forth in clause (b)(ii) of the preceding sentence multiplied by a fraction the numerator of which is the number of the participant’s years of service at December 31, 2013 and the denominator of which is 15, or, if greater, the retirement benefit accrued at December 31, 2010.

For some participants the retirement benefit produced under the formula described above is reduced by the actuarial equivalent of earlier benefit payments. For purposes of the formula, base salary is the amount that would be included in the salary column of the Summary Compensation Table for the relevant years. For computations involving years when annual cash bonuses are included in the formula for determining the amount of the retirement benefit, the cash bonus is the amount of the cash bonus earned under the 2005 MIP or predecessor plan or any other annual incentive bonus plan or discretionary annual award that would be included in either the Bonus or Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table as earned in respect of the relevant years. The Retirement Plan’s benefit formula contains a factor which will reduce a married participant’s benefit payments to the extent that a participant is older than his or her spouse.

If a participant becomes totally disabled prior to retirement, then for the period of total disability the participant is treated as earning annual base salary in an amount which is equal to

-63-


his or her annual base salary at the time of disability, with such base salary amount adjusted annually for inflation. Further, a participant’s period of disability will be treated as continued employment for all purposes under the Retirement Plan, including for purposes of determining his or her years of service.

A participant who has terminated employment may start to receive benefits under the Retirement Plan as early as age 55, but the benefit payable at that time will be reduced to reflect the commencement of benefit payments prior to Normal Retirement Age, which is defined as age 65 with 15 years of service. A participant who terminated employment with us after reaching age 55 and completing at least 20 years of service, or after reaching age 60 and completing at least 10 years of service, will have a smaller reduction (a reduction equal to 3% of his or her accrued benefit) than a participant who terminated employment prior to reaching such age or completing such number of years of service (a reduction equal to 6% of his or her accrued benefit), and therefore has a subsidized early retirement benefit. The benefit payable to a participant who retires after Normal Retirement Age is increased to the greater of (i) the benefit taking into account additional years of service, salary increases and (for years prior to 2011) bonuses paid through the actual date of retirement or (ii) the benefit that is actuarially equivalent to the lump sum that would have been payable at Normal Retirement Age, such lump sum increased with interest to reflect the passage of time since Normal Retirement Age. For all purposes of the Retirement Plan, a participant’s years of service are the number of years, including a fraction thereof, included in the period which starts on the date he or she becomes a participant, and which ends on the date his or her employment with us terminates.

As of December 31, 2012,2015, Mr. Hicks was age 5659 and had 1013 years of credited service (for the purpose of early retirement qualification), thus he could have retired and begun to receive a retirement benefit as of that date. If Mr. Hicks had retired on December 31, 2015, the present value of his early retirement benefit would have been $10,155,457. As of December 31, 2012,2015, Messrs. Gorham, Dalrymple and BorrelliGorham were under age 55, thus noneneither of them would have been eligible to receive a subsidized early retirement benefit if he had retired as of that date. If Messrs. Brandon, Gorham,Mr. Dalrymple and BorrelliMr. Gorham had retired on December 31, 2012,2015, the present value of their retirement benefits assuming commencement at their earliest retirement dates and reflecting their benefit elections under Section 409A of the Code would have been $1,564,798 for Mr. Gorham, $927,684$1,368,849 for Mr. Dalrymple and $638,214$1,870,396 for Mr. Borrelli.Gorham. Mr. Brandon would not have been entitled to any retirement benefit if he had retired as of December 31, 20122015 because he would not

-66-


have had five years of service. As noted above, in anticipation of the closing of the Retirement Plan to new participants effective December 31, 2013, the Board did not designate Mr. Sennott as a participant in the Retirement Plan.

-64-


Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

Name

  Executive
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal Year
   Registrant
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal Year(1)
   Aggregate
Earnings
in Last
Fiscal Year
(2)
   Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
  Aggregate
Balance at  Last
Fiscal Year End
 

Weston M. Hicks

  $ —    $185,938    $134,569    $(2,697 $1,742,543  

Joseph P. Brandon

  $    $117,045    $1,002    $(1,888 $116,159  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

  $    $67,063    $36,086    $(973 $528,984  

Roger B. Gorham

  $    $82,500    $20,551    $(1,197 $703,797  

Jerry G. Borrelli

  $    $58,375    $72,969    $(846 $1,647,675(3) 

(1)Such amounts are included as a component of “All Other Compensation” for 2012 set forth in the Summary Compensation Table on page 50 and discussed in Note (5) to the Summary Compensation Table.

(2)Amounts represent interest earned on amounts credited to savings benefit accounts during 2012. Such amounts are not included in the Summary Compensation Table on page 50 as these amounts are not considered to be above-market interest.

(3)Of this amount, $983,828 consists of compensation earned by Mr. Borrelli that he elected to defer and $663,847 consists of contributions made by Alleghany to the savings benefit account of Mr. Borrelli.

Alleghany’s Deferred Compensation Plan, which was established in January 1982 and amended in January 2011, provides for unfunded deferred compensation arrangements for Alleghany officers and certain other employees. The following descriptions of “Savings Benefit Provisions” and “Compensation Deferral Provisions” of the Deferred Compensation Plan generally apply to amounts that were earned and vested under the Deferred Compensation Plan after December 31, 2004. Amounts earned and vested before January 1, 2005, or the “Pre-409A Benefits,” are subject to less stringent requirements concerning the time of payment of benefits under the Deferred Compensation Plan, but the substantive provisions that apply to the Pre-409A Benefits are generally the same as described below.

Savings Benefit Provisions

All officers, including the Named Executive Officers, are eligible to participate in the Deferred Compensation Plan on the date of election or appointment as an officer of Alleghany.

-65-


Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, we credit a book reserve account in an amount equal to 3.75% of the base annual salary, excluding bonuses, commissions and severance pay, of each officer who is a participant at any time during such calendar quarter, resulting in an annual credit of 15% of a participant’s base annual salary, referred to as the “Savings Benefit Credit.” Each participant may elect to have those amounts either credited with interest at the prime rate (the “Prime Rate Alternative”), treated as though invested in common stock (the “Common Stock Alternative”), or increased or decreased by an amount proportionate to the growth or decline of Alleghany stockholders’ equity per share (the “Stockholders’ Equity Alternative”). In general, payment of these amounts is made or commences on the date elected by the participant, which may not be later than 12 months following termination of employment, either in a lump sum or in installments as elected by the participant.

If a participant chooses the Prime Rate Alternative, that interest is computed from the date the Savings Benefit Credit is credited until the date that the amount is distributed to the participant or the date that the participant elects the Common Stock Alternative or the Stockholders’ Equity Alternative. The “prime rate” for purposes of the Deferred Compensation Plan means the rate of interest announced by JPMorgan Chase Bank as its prime rate at the close of the last business day of each month, which rate is deemed to remain in effect through the last business day of the next month.

Amounts treated as invested in common stock reflect the investment experience which the account would have had if the amounts had been invested, without commissions or other transaction expenses, and held in whole or fractional shares of common stock during the deferral period. These amounts are adjusted as appropriate to reflect cash and stock dividends, stock splits, and other similar distributions or transactions which, from time to time, occur with respect to common stock. Dividends and other distributions are automatically credited at their cash value or the fair market value of any non-cash dividend or other distribution and are deemed to purchase common stock on the date of payment thereof. Common stock is deemed acquired, and is valued for purposes of payout or transfer, at a price per share equal to the mean between the high and low prices thereof on the applicable date on the New York Stock Exchange Consolidated Tape. A participant’s ability to elect to have his or her Savings Benefit Credit amounts treated as invested (or not invested) in our common stock is subject to compliance with applicable securities laws.

With respect to 2012, Mr. Hicks elected the Stockholders’ Equity Alternative to apply to his Savings Benefit Credit; Messrs. Brandon and Gorham elected to have the Prime Rate Alternative apply to their Savings Benefit Credit; Mr. Dalrymple elected to have the Stockholders’ Equity Alternative apply to 50% of his Savings Benefit Credit and to have the Prime Rate Alternative apply to 50% of his Savings Benefit Credit; and Mr. Borrelli elected to have the Stockholders’ Equity Alternative apply to 25% of his Savings Benefit Credit and to have the Prime Rate Alternative apply to 75% of his Savings Benefit.

-66-


Compensation Deferral Provisions

The Deferred Compensation Plan provides that participants may elect to defer all or part of their base salary and annual incentive compensation each year other than compensation that would be paid in the form of common stock. Thus, currently, no long-term incentive compensation payable pursuant to the 2002 LTIP, 2007 LTIP or 2012 LTIP may be deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan. Amounts deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan are credited with interest at the prime rate, unless a participant elects the Common Stock Alternative or the Stockholders’ Equity Alternative. A participant’s decision to have deferred amounts treated as invested (or not invested) in common stock is also subject to compliance with applicable securities laws.

-67-


PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENTPayments Upon Termination Of Employment

The table below provides information regarding the amounts that Messrs. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple, Gorham and BorrelliSennott would be eligible to receive upon any termination of employment by Alleghany other than for “Cause,” if such termination of employment occurred on December 31, 2012:2015:

 

 Severance
under
Employment
Agreement(1)
 Payments
under
Restricted
Stock
Award
Agreements(2)
 Payments
under
Restricted
Stock
Unit Matching
Grant Award
(3)
 Acceleration
of Payment
of Awards
under

2002 and
2007 LTIP
(4)
 Acceleration
of Payment
of Awards
under

2010
MIP
(5)
 Retirement
Plan(6)
 Deferred
Compensation
Plan(7)
 Post-
Retirement
Medical
Plan(8)
 Total 

Name

 Severance
under
Employment
Agreement(1)
 Payments under
Restricted
Stock

Unit Matching
Grant Award(2)
 Acceleration
of Payment

of Awards
under

2007 and
2012 LTIP(3)
 Acceleration
of Payment
of Awards
under

2010
MIP(4)
 Retirement
Plan(5)
 Deferred
Compensation
Plan(6)
 Total 

Weston M. Hicks

 $1,000,000   $9,930,024       $9,359,149   $2,062,500   $7,441,178   $1,742,543   $317,974   $31,853,368   $1,000,000       $16,803,489   $1,700,000   $10,155,457   $2,780,352   $32,439,298  

Joseph P. Brandon

 $1,000,000       $381,644   $3,091,696   $1,200,000       $116,159       $5,789,499    1,000,000   $1,545,851    9,444,510    1,620,000        528,321    14,138,682  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

             $1,037,596   $438,750   $927,684   $528,984       $2,933,014            2,924,984    614,250    1,368,849    896,487    5,804,570  

Roger B. Gorham

     $1,361,036       $2,936,773   $536,250   $1,564,798   $703,797       $7,102,654    1,200,000        2,302,107    270,000    1,870,396    1,227,474    6,869,977  

Jerry G. Borrelli

             $988,467   $234,000   $638,214   $1,647,675       $3,508,356  

John L. Sennott, Jr.

  ���        2,192,912    614,250        254,527    3,061,689  

 

(1)These amounts would be paid by Alleghany upon termination other than for Cause, death or Total Disability (as such terms are defined in the respective employment agreements) in the form of continued payments of base salary in accordance with our normal payroll and procedures.

 

(2)Reflects award amounts payable to Mr. Hicks under his 2004 restricted stock agreement and to Mr. Gorham under his 2004 restricted stock agreement if Messrs. Hicks or Gorham were terminated other than for Cause or Total Disability (as such terms are defined in such agreements) based on the elapsed portion of the award period prior to termination and the performance goal of average annual compound growth in Stockholders’ Equity Per Share through the date of termination having been satisfied as of December 31, 2012. The terms of these agreements are described on pages 56 and 59. These amounts were paid to Mr. Hicks and Mr. Gorham in February 2013 upon the vesting of their respective 2004 restricted stock awards.

(3)Reflects award amount payable to Mr. Brandon under his restricted stock unit matching grant award agreement if Mr. Brandon was terminated without Cause or by reason of his death or Total Disability (as such terms are defined in such matching agreement). The terms of this restricted stock unit matching agreement are described on page 58.60.

 

(4)(3)Reflects payment on a pro rata basis of all outstanding LTIP awards, including amounts paid in February 20132016 for the award period ending December 31, 2012,2015, based on the elapsed portion of the award period prior to termination and average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share through the date of termination, in accordance with the terms of the awards.

 

-68-


(5)(4)Reflects annual incentive earned in respect of 20122015 under the 2010 MIP. These amounts, earned in respect of 20122015 performance, were paid to the Named Executive Officers in February 20132016 as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 5054 and as described on pages 42 through 44.49 and 50.

 

(6)(5)Reflects payment of vested pension benefits, computed as of December 31, 2012,2015, under the Retirement Plan to Messrs. Hicks, Dalrymple Gorham and Borrelli.Gorham. Mr. Brandon was not vested in the Retirement Plan as of December 31, 2012.2015 and Mr. Sennott is not a participant in the Retirement Plan. The determination of these pension benefits is described in more detail on pages 6265 through 64.67. This amount does not include retiree life insurance death benefit, equal to the highest annual salary of a participant prior toat the date of retirement, payable to Messrs. Hicks, Dalrymple, Gorham and Borrelli. Mr. Brandon was not vested in such retiree life insurance death benefit as of December 31, 2012.our Named Executive Officers.

 

(7)(6)Reflects the aggregate vested account balance at December 31, 20122015 of each Named Executive Officer’s savings benefit (consisting of Alleghany contributions and interest earned thereon) under the Deferred Compensation Plan.

(8)Reflects accumulated accrued benefit under our Post-Retirement Medical Plan for Mr. Hicks. Messrs. Brandon, Dalrymple, Gorham and Borrelli were not eligible to receive benefits under this plan at such date. Under the Post-Retirement Medical Plan, Alleghany would pay two-thirds of coverage premium and the Named Executive Officer would pay one-third of the coverage premium. Alleghany may terminate the Post-Retirement Medical Plan at any time.

Certain of our Named Executive Officers would be entitled to payments in the event of the termination of their employment. These payments, other than those that do not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of the Named Executive Officers and that are generally available to all salaried employees, are described below.

-67-


Pursuant to their employment agreements with Alleghany, each of Mr.Messrs. Hicks and Mr. Brandon would be entitled to receive continued payments of his base salary until such payments aggregate $1.0 million on a gross basis, payable in accordance with our normal payroll and procedures, following termination of his employment other than for Cause or in the event of his death or Total Disability. As described in more detail on pages 56 and 59,page 60, the restricted stock award agreements with Messrs. Hicks and Gorham provide for pro rata payments in the event of termination of employment other than termination for Cause or Total Disability, if certain performance conditions have been met. As described in more detail on page 58, the restricted stock unit matching grant award agreement with Mr. BrandonJPB Matching Grant Agreement provides for a pro rata payment in the event of the termination of employment without Cause or termination of

-69-


employment by reason of Mr. Brandon’s death or Total Disability. In February 2013, Mr. Gorham and Alleghany entered into a letter agreement which provides for continued payments to Mr. Gorham of his base salary until such payments aggregate $1.2 million on a gross basis, payable in accordance with our normal payroll and procedures, following termination of his employment other than for Cause or in the event of his death or Total Disability. The foregoing agreements generally define “Cause” to mean conviction of a felony; willful failure to implement reasonable directives of the Chairman or the Board, as well as the PresidentAlleghany’s chief executive officer in Messrs.Mr. Brandon and Gorham’s cases, after written notice, which failure is not corrected within ten days following notice thereof; or gross misconduct in connection with the performance of any of their duties. “Total Disability” in the foregoing agreements generally is defined to mean inability to discharge duties due to physical or mental illness or accident for one or more periods totaling six months during any consecutive twelve-month period.

Mr. Brandon received 11,137 fully-vested, non-forfeitable shares of restricted common stock awarded to him under the 2007 LTIP pursuant to a success shares award agreement. These shares are subject to restrictions upon transfer until the earliest to occur of (i) March 6, 2015, (ii) Mr. Brandon’s termination of employment for any reason or (iii) a merger approved by the Board effectuated by a tender offer or other major corporate transaction approved by the Board with respect to Alleghany’s common stock.

Other than the foregoing, there are no individual arrangements that would provide payments to our Named Executive Officers upon termination other than for cause or in the event of death or disability. We do not have any arrangements with our Named Executive Officers that would provide for payments upon a change of control of Alleghany or upon a change of control and subsequent termination of employment,employment; although Mr. Brandon’s restricted stock unit matching agreement does provide that his holding requirement for JPB Owned Shares will lapse upon a change of control.

A number of the plans described in this proxy statementProxy Statement have provisions that may result in payments upon termination of employment under certain circumstances as described below.

2007 LTIP and 2012 LTIP

Awards under our 2002 LTIP, 2007 LTIP and 2012 LTIP provide for the pro rata payment of outstanding awards in the event of the termination of employment prior to the end of the award period. With respect to awards under the 2002 LTIP, 2007 LTIP and 2012 LTIP, the pro rata payment would be based on the elapsed portion of the award period prior to termination and average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share through the December 31st immediately prior to date of termination, as determined by the Compensation Committee.

2010 MIP and 2015 MIP

Our 2010 MIP and 2015 MIP also providesprovide that, in the event of a participant’s death or disability prior to the end of the award period for an outstanding award, the participant (or in the event of the

-70-


participant’s death, the participant’s beneficiary) shall receive such portion of the award, if any, as determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion. If the employment of a participant who has received a non-qualifying award is otherwise terminated during an award period, the Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may determine that the participant shall be entitled to receive all or any part of the outstanding award payable to such participant. If the employment of a participant who has received a qualifying award is otherwise terminated during an award period, the participant shall not be entitled to receive any payment for such award unless the performance goals applicable to such award are achieved and certified by the Compensation Committee, in which case the Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may determine that the participant shall be entitled to receive all or any part of the qualifying award that would be payable to the participant upon the achievement of those performance goals. Pursuant to the 2015 MIP, if a participant who has received a non-qualifying award terminates employment for any reason (other than death or disability), the Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may determine that the participant is entitled to receive payment of all or any part of the non-qualifying award.

-68-


Retirement Plan and Deferred Compensation Plan

Additional payments upon any termination of employment would be made under our Retirement Plan, and Executive Retiree Health Plan, or “Post-Retirement Medical Plan,” as long as the employee is eligible to receive benefits under the Retirement Plan at the time of the termination of employment. Our Deferred Compensation Plan also provides for payments of a participant’s vested savings benefit in the event of any termination of employment in the form previously elected by a participant subject to the provisions of Section 409A of the Code, as applicable, or if no election has been made, in a lump sum. A terminationTermination of employment will not cause an enhanced payment or other benefit to be made under the Deferred Compensation Plan. Information with respect to the Retirement Plan is set forth on pages 6265 through 64,67, and information with respect to the Deferred Compensation Plan is set forth on pages 65 through 67.63 and 64.

 

-71-


PROPOSAL 3. ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are providing stockholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on the 2012 compensation we paid to the executive officers who are named in the Summary Compensation Table on page 50. For 2012, Weston M. Hicks, Joseph P. Brandon, Christopher K. Dalrymple, Roger B. Gorham and Jerry G. Borrelli are our “Named Executive Officers.”

At our Annual Meeting of Stockholders in April 2012, we conducted an advisory vote on the 2011 compensation of our executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table included in the proxy statement for our 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and approximately 90% of the votes cast on such proposal were voted in favor of the proposal.

Please read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and Compensation Matters beginning on page 32 of this proxy statement as well as the Summary Compensation Table and other related compensation tables, notes and narrative appearing on pages 50 through 71 of this proxy statement, which provide detailed information on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers.

The Compensation Committee and the Board believe that Alleghany’s 2012 executive compensation program was designed appropriately and assured that management’s interests were aligned with the interests of Alleghany stockholders. Accordingly, we are asking our stockholders to vote in favor of the following advisory resolution at the 2013 Annual Meeting:

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of Alleghany Corporation (“Alleghany”) approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of Alleghany’s named executive officers as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and Compensation Matters, the Summary Compensation Table, and the related compensation tables, notes and narrative set forth in the proxy statement for Alleghany’s 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Although this advisory resolution, commonly referred to as a “say-on-pay” resolution, is non-binding on the Board, the Board and the Compensation Committee will review and consider the voting results when making future decisions about our executive compensation program. Abstentions and broker non-votes (see “Information About Voting”) will not be counted in evaluating the results of the vote.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THIS PROPOSAL.

-72-


ALL OTHER MATTERS THAT MAY COME BEFORE THE 2013 ANNUAL MEETING

As of the date of this proxy statement, the Board knows of no business that will be presented for consideration at the 2013 Annual Meeting other than that referred to above. As to other business, if any, that may come before the 2013 Annual Meeting, shares represented by proxy will be voted in accordance with the judgment of the person or persons voting the proxies.

-73--69-


STOCKHOLDER NOMINATIONS AND PROPOSALS

Alleghany’s By-Laws, which are available on Alleghany’s website at www.alleghany.com, require that Alleghany be furnished with written notice with respect to:

 

the nomination of a person for election as a director, other than a person nominated by or at the direction of the Board,Board; and

 

the submission of a proposal, other than a proposal submitted by or at the direction of the Board, at a meeting of stockholders.

In order for any such nomination or submission to be proper, the notice must contain certain information concerning the nominating or proposing stockholder and the nominee or the proposal, as the case may be, and must be furnished to Alleghany generally not less than 30 days prior to the meeting. A copy of the applicable By-Law provisions may be obtained, without charge, upon written request to the Secretary of Alleghany at Alleghany’s principal executive offices.

In accordance with the rules of the SEC Rule 14a-8, in order for any proposal of a stockholder intended to be presented at Alleghany’s 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must be received by the Secretary of Alleghany by November 16, 2013 in order for the proposal to be considered for inclusion in Alleghany’s notice of meeting, proxy statement and proxy relating to the 20142017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, scheduled for Friday, April 25, 2014.

SHARED ADDRESS STOCKHOLDERS

In accordance with a notice sent to eligible stockholders who share a single address, we are sending only one annual report to stockholders and one proxy statement to that address unless we28, 2017, the proposal must be received instructions to the contrary from any stockholder at that address. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce our printing and postage costs. However, if a stockholder of record wishes to receive a separate annual report to stockholders and proxy statement in the future, a separate copy may be obtained, without charge, upon written or oral request to the office ofby the Secretary of Alleghany Corporation, 7 Times Square Tower, New York, New York, 10036, telephone number (212) 752-1356. Eligible stockholders of record who receive multiple copies of our annual report to stockholders and proxy statement can request householding by contacting us in the same manner. Stockholders who own shares through a bank, broker, or other nominee can request householding by contacting the nominee. We hereby undertake to deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the annual report to stockholders and proxy statement to a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the document was delivered.November 18, 2016.

 

-74--70-


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

At any time prior to their being voted, proxies are revocable by written notice to the Secretary of Alleghany, submitting a new proper proxy dated later than the date of the revoked proxy, or by appearance at the 20132016 Annual Meeting and voting in person. A quorum comprising the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Alleghany’s common stock on the record date must be present in person or represented by proxy for the transaction of business at the 20132016 Annual Meeting.

Solicitation of proxies will be made by mail, courier, telephone, facsimile or e-mail and, to the extent necessary, by telegrams and personal interviews. Alleghany will bear the expenses in connection with the solicitation of proxies. Brokers, custodians and fiduciaries will be requested to transmit proxy material to the beneficial owners of common stock held of record by such persons at Alleghany’s expense. Alleghany has retained Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc. to aid in the solicitation of proxies, and for its services Alleghany expects to pay fees of approximately $9,500 plus expenses.

 

-71-


By order of the Board of Directors,

ALLEGHANY CORPORATION

IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION  

CHRISTOPHER K. DALRYMPLE
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and SecretaryUsing ablack ink pen, mark your votes with anX as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.  x  

March 15, 2013

-75-


 

                      ALLEGHANY CORPORATION

Electronic Voting Instructions

 

              LOGO

Electronic Voting Instructions

You can vote by Internet or telephone Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a weekweek!

 

Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the two voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.

LOGO

Vote by Internet

•  Go towww.envisionreports.com/YAL.

•  Or scan the QR code with your smartphone.

•  Follow the steps outlined on the secure website.

Vote by telephone

•  Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada any time on a touch tone telephone. There isNO CHARGE to you for the call.

•  Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message.

 

VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.

 

Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., EDT,Eastern Daylight Time, on April 26, 2013.22, 2016.

LOGOVote by Internet

•    Go towww.envisionreports.com/YAL

•    Or scan the QR code with your smartphone

•    Follow the steps outlined on the secure website

Vote by telephone

•    Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA,

        US territories & Canada any time on a touch tone  telephone. There is

NO CHARGEto you for the call.

Using ablack inkpen, mark your votes with anXas shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.x

 

•    Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message.Alleghany Corporation Annual Meeting Proxy Card

LOGO

q  IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.  q

 

 

 A Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR the listed nominees andFOR Proposals 2 and 3.

 

A1. Vote onElection of Directors   
1.Election of Directors — The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR the listed nominees.+
  For Against Abstain  For Against Abstain  For Against Abstain +
 1a - Stephen P. Bradley¨¨¨1b - Karen Brenner ¨ ¨ ¨ 1c   1b - Thomas S. Johnson¨¨¨
ForAgainstAbstain
1d - James F. WillJohn G. Foos ¨ ¨ ¨     
 Vote on Proposals     ForAgainstAbstain 

For

Against

Abstain

2. 

Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — The Board

Ratification of Directors recommends a voteFOR the following

proposal.Ratificationselection of Ernst & Young LLP as Alleghany Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year 2013.fiscal 2016.

 ¨ ¨ ¨ 
          

For

 

Against

 

Abstain

 
3. 

Say-on-Pay — The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR the following proposal.

Advisory vote to approve the compensation of the named executive compensationofficers of Alleghany Corporation.

 ¨ ¨ ¨ 

BNon-Voting Items
Change of Address— Please print new address below. B  

CAuthorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted — Date and Sign BelowBelow.
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.  Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box.  

Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.

         //      

IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOUMUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - C ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD.

01ZNTC


Important Notice Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for the Alleghany Corporation 20132016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on April 26, 201322, 2016.

Our proxy materials relating to our Annual Meeting (Notice of Meeting, Proxy Statement, Proxy and 20122015 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K) are also available on the Internet. Please go to www.envisionreports.com/YAL to view and obtain proxy materials online.

For comments and/or address changes, please send an email to info2@alleghany.com or call 1.888.752.1356.

 

q  IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.  q

 

 

+

 

 

ProxyPROXY — ALLEGHANY CORPORATION

 

 

PROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS ON APRIL 26, 2013

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ALLEGHANY CORPORATION FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON APRIL 22, 2016

The undersigned hereby appoints Jefferson W. Kirby, Weston M. Hicks and Christopher K. Dalrymple proxies, each with the power to appoint his substitute and with authority in each to act in absence of the other, to represent and to vote all shares of stock of Alleghany Corporation which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Alleghany Corporation to be held at theThe Penn Club of New York, City, 30 West 44th44th Street, New York, New York, on Friday, April 26, 201322, 2016 at 10:00 a.m., local time, and any adjournments thereof, as indicated on the proposals described in the Proxy Statement, and all other matters properly coming before the meeting.

WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN. IF NO SUCH DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

IMPORTANT - THIS PROXY MUST BE SIGNED AND DATED ON THE REVERSE SIDE.

 C Non-Voting Items

Change of Address —Please print new address below.

¢IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - C ON BOTH SIDES  OF THIS CARD.+